Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There Seems to be a Disconnect

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 01:18 PM
Original message
There Seems to be a Disconnect
between the claims that:

(1) Dean made a huge strategic mistake by spending too much in IA and NH.

(2) Dean wasted millions of dollars by building a nationwide organization.

They cannot both be true. Kerry's momentum seems to support the importance of winning those contests. But on the other hand, if going for broke in IA and NH was bad, then building a long-term, nationwide organzation was good. The nationwide organization was also designed to get a head start on the GE.

All the candidates spent most of their money up front. I'm beginning to think there IS no financial scandal here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. you're beginning to think?
There never was a financial scandal. It was an attempt to grind Dean into the dust after some dispiriting losses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't see it
IMO, it's possible to spend too much money in IA and NH, while at the same time, spend too much money on a nationwide organization.

BTW, you got it wrong. It's not that he spent too much money on a national organization. It's that he spent too early on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes, It's Possible That He Spent Too Early
but the primaries are designed to reward that behavior.

It's 20-20 hindsight. If Dean had won NH, much less IA, he would not only get the front-runner bump in the polls and fundraising, but ALSO have a huge lead in organization.

That was the idea -- and until a few weeks ago, it was supported by all the polls. Seems like a good strategy.

And Dean STILL seems to have the most cash on hand of all the candidates. I haven't seen any reason not to think this is a phony story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. That's not true
the primaries are designed to reward that behavior

I'm not sure where you heard that one. The one I've heard is about how voters have a poor memory, so campaigning to soon does little good because those ads are forgotten before the voting starts.

If Dean had won NH, much less IA, he would not only get the front-runner bump in the polls and fundraising, but ALSO have a huge lead in organization

I agree. IMO, shooting to win in NH an IA was the only likely way Dean could win the nomination. If it had worked, we'd all be calling Dean a genius. Unfortunately, it didn't work.

And Dean STILL seems to have the most cash on hand of all the candidates. I haven't seen any reason not to think this is a phony story

Not a "phony" story. The majority of stories about elections typically revolve around "process" stories that depict it like a horse race, and are usually light on the issues. Also, while Dean has cash in hand, candidates who do worse than expected (a description which applies to Dean) often see the donations reduced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'd agree if Dean were polling better in all of those other states.
The only thing I saw in Iowa and NH was that Dean supporters didn't actually vote. Did they think there would be enough people voting that they didn't have to show up? I'm still confused about where the Dean supporters went.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KC21304 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. I think most of the Dean supporters you saw in Iowa
were young people brought in from other states, and sadly they were not allowed to caucus. I heard that strategy even got under the skin of some of the older people. I may be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom of Speech Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. but I don't think you are. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. We still haven't seen the full products from all of Dean's spending...
Ad spots was pre-purchased. Plenty more ads will run off of what has already been paid for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Really?
See, there's another angle I didn't know. It just keeps getting better.

And yet the picture people are left with is a flat broke organization, a campaign manager fired under a cloud of allegations, and an inability to control money. Amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. It was the pens
I'm telling you, I get dozens and dozens of pens every month from DFA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
isbister Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Didn't Dean himself say
it was a strategic mistake by spending too much in IA and NH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. Its not a scandel, its a shame...
he needed to hold back or otherwise have 10 million or so to split among the February primaries and caucuses.

He ended up with half that and the result imposed on him cutting back his activity. I don't think anyone broke any laws or ethical guidelines, its disappointing and makes the rest of the campaign more important.










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC