Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Clearing A Cop's Name Matters In Abramoff Scandal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:27 AM
Original message
Why Clearing A Cop's Name Matters In Abramoff Scandal
This is the loophole.

Why Clearing A Cop's Name Matters In Abramoff Scandal


By Jeffrey H. Birnbaum
Monday, March 20, 2006; Page D01

A former D.C. cop could alter national politics this year.

Here's why: An appeals court decision that involves (a former Metropolitan Police Department detective named Nelson Valdes) could well make it harder for prosecutors to make a case against lawmakers implicated in the Jack Abramoff lobbying scandal.
....

Scholars say that as a result of the Valdes case, the process of charging lawmakers and their aides with wrongdoing in the Abramoff scandal (and others like it) will be more difficult.

"Now, virtually every time the government tries to bring an official-acts prosecution, the defense will cite the Valdes case," said George D. Brown, professor at Boston College Law School. "The decision raises a substantial element of doubt,"

Kathleen Clark, a law professor at Washington University in St. Louis, agreed. "I'd be very troubled if I were in the Justice Department pursuing these things," she said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. you're missing an important part of that story in your excerpt.
here...including this might help people who don't want to subscribe to read the whole story.

According to the court's record, Valdes ran license plates through a law enforcement database and provided the vehicle-owner information he collected to a person who paid him cash. He was convicted in 2002 of taking illegal gratuities.

But a three-judge appeals court panel recently reversed that decision. It said, in an opinion dated Feb. 24, that his actions weren't a formal part of his duties and therefore weren't covered by the statute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC