Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Election Judges--What They're Being Told & Not Told

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 03:23 AM
Original message
Election Judges--What They're Being Told & Not Told
My daughter signed up to be an election judge

she had to go to a 2 hour meeting (i thought they would be talking about election laws, electioneering, what to do or who to call if someone's name isn't on the roll, etc. but i was wrong)

instead it was a two hour meeting all about how to set up, turn on and run the single diebold machine each precinct is supposed to have.

unfreakingreal

here's the kicker about the "paper trail" bullshit we're supposed to have:
(this is pretty close to how our conversation went after her "meeting")

her: it has a paper trail
me: really? so if i vote on the machine i get a paper receipt and hand it to one of the judges so you can lock it away?
her: no. the receipt is printed in the machine.
me: it stays in the machine?
her: yes
me: i never get to see it or touch it?
her: no.
me: how do i know it even bothers to print a receipt?
her: we did a test printing and you can hear that grinding print/paper sound.
me: how do i know it's printing what i voted?
her: you don't
me: so basically these machines could be programed to print a bullshit receipt for every twenty votes or whatever?
her: probably

how comforting is that? here's the double kicker:
me: did they tell you or show you how to change the roll if it runs out of paper?
her: no
me: what? why not?
her: they said it's just a primary and the paper roll probably won't run out.
me: but what if it does? what if it runs out and fifty more people vote? there won't be a receipt?
her: i guess not.

now, my daughter is a student judge--but at this training meeting there were only one or two other people who looked like they might be students--everyone else there was at least thirty years old. and no one was told how to change the paper (do you have to turn off the machine to change it? do you have to save or reset anything in order to open it up and change the paper? no one was told how to do that.)

i talked to a man who was there--who has been working with the county and the early voting. he thinks that come november we won't have any paper ballots in the county--that we'll only be voting on the machines.

so i guess my republican county is about to get a whole lot more republican. ARGGGHHHHHH!

also, my daughter got a paper in the mail that "encourages" them to attend one more meeting before our primary, so maybe they'll talk about various voting rules/laws then--but attendance at that meeting is not required.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like your state needs a VVPAT law with Auditing, for a start.

It is disturbing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. please tell me what that
stands for

voter verified paper ... trail


i could call my senators about it, but i couldn't call my house republican or my state rep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 04:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. voter verified paper audit trail
Which is an over simplification.

VVPAT could be a roll of paper, similar to what you describe though visable to the voter.

What is more desirable is a separate ballot produced that can be hand-counted for auditing (which should be mandatory) and recounts.

Are you aware of the Election Reform Forum?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=203

It would be interesting to hear more about the DRE, er, I mean, election judge training.

(Oh! DRE. That's Direct Recording Electronic, loosely called Touch Screen)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. my daughter is fully aware of how i feel about these machines
she has heard me talking about it for the past number of years. she knows i think the kerry gore elections were rigged. she knows she knows she knows

and yet, after that meeting, she sounded rather impressed with this machine. they were really talking them up as to how great they are: there is an audio component, there is screen enlargement, etc.

i said to her that it sounds as if these machines are so damn smart they can do everything including taking you out to lunch. then who's to say they can't switch a vote when they print on the paper the voter never sees.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizMoonstar Donating Member (392 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. I've been thinking about being an election judge. should I?
after hearing this i begin to think it's pointless.

(although i must admit, i mainly want to do it so i can show myself to be 'involved in the community' -- our area is pretty uncontested.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. i'm wishing i had signed up
so i would be in on what was going on first hand

as it is now, i'm going it by playing 20 questions with my kid

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. i called durbin's office today
in d.c. and the person i spoke to told me that this sort of thing is really a state and county matter--i should contact my reps in state and county. i said, well, they're republican and somehow i don't think this matter would bother them very much. the person in durbin's office said: "Well, this is a bipartisian issue" and i just laughed. Oh, yeah, sure it is.

and she had no statement she could give me on durbin supporting feingold. i said i want him to support this censure business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC