Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conyers, RE: spying: Repubs bail out Bush-absolutely disgraceful

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:12 AM
Original message
Conyers, RE: spying: Repubs bail out Bush-absolutely disgraceful
http://www.conyersblog.us/archives/00000397.htm

Senate Republicans Sacrifice our Liberties to Bail Out Bush

The Senate Republicans completely capitulated today to the Bush Administration, sacrificing our privacy and scores of personal rights and liberties to provide approval, after the fact, to the Bush warrantless wiretapping program. A group of "moderate" Republicans have joined Senator Dewine of Ohio in support of a bill to allow warrantless wiretapping, but at the same time reinforce the jurisdiction of the FISA court. (huh?) I don't get it either. Can you imagine what the bill language must read? "Now we're serious this time. No more pretending that the FISA court doesn't exist. That's not playing fair." Senator Snowe claimed that this legislation would strengthen the FISA court. Give me a break. Actually the language says that a warrant must be sought whenever possible (read convenient). Frankly, if you don't get penalized for ignoring the court in the first place, where's the incentive to now begin obeying the law? This is absolutely disgraceful.

In other news, not one Republican seems to remember who Jack Abramoff is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Now, if we can only get this on the 6:00 news
It would... ah, who am I kidding?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. The repubs will benefit from any intelligence gathering that just
happens to have a partisan component. They know they can use intelligence to their benefit and as long as they are the majority they will lock out the dems.

Why is that hard to understand?

It's wrong on many levels and probably illegal but when you are the majority party you can write the rules. That constitution thing is just a piece of paper - thats not what is holding the country together - the rulers are holding down the fort.

:sarcasm: :grr: :dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. What was the vote break down? Was it straight party line?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes. Here's an article...
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-usnsa084654381mar08,0,5128027.story

snip//

After some Republicans met with White House aides, the 15-member Senate Intelligence Committee met for a nearly two-hour closed session and voted along partisan lines to adopt the GOP plan.

snip//
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Is there any way to override a sub-committee decision?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It's tough.....
without the committee, it doesn't even get to the floor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Is there any history of it being done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC