Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

List of 22 ports affected by sale to Dubai

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 07:47 PM
Original message
List of 22 ports affected by sale to Dubai
The following is a list that the Associated Press put together:

Here is a list of all U.S. ports affected by the pending sale of London-based Peninsular & Oriental Steam Navigation Co. to Dubai-owned DP World:
—Baltimore: DP World would manage and operate two of the port’s 14 terminals, Homeland Security says.
—Baton Rouge, La.: DP World would run some stevedoring operations at the port’s general cargo dock, a port spokeswoman said.
—Beaumont, Texas: DP World would run one of about six stevedoring operations, the port’s manager said.
—Boston: DP World would operate the Black Falcon Cruise Terminal with the Massachusetts Port Authority, and would run stevedoring operations at the Moran Automobile Terminal, according to Peninsular & Oriental.
—Camden, N.J.: DP World would run some stevedoring operations as part owners of Delaware River Stevedores, according to Peninsular & Oriental.
—Corpus Christi, Texas: DP World would operate some stevedoring operations as part of a joint venture, Dix-Fairway, according to a port spokesman and Peninsular & Oriental.
—Davisville, R.I.: DP World would run some stevedoring operations, a spokesman for Peninsular & Oriental’s local office said.
—Freeport, Texas: DP World would run some stevedoring operations, a port spokesman said.
—Galveston, Texas: DP World would run some stevedoring operations at one terminal, a port spokeswoman said.
—Gulfport, Miss.: DP World would become one of two stevedoring companies, a port spokesman said.
—Houston: DP World would work with other stevedoring contractors at three of the port’s 12 terminals, Homeland Security said.
—Lake Charles, La.: DP World would operate some stevedoring operations, a spokeswoman said.
—Miami: DP World would operate and manage with another firm, Eller & Company Inc., one of the port’s three terminals, not including Miami’s seven cruise ship terminals, Homeland Security said. It also would operate some stevedoring services.
—Newark: DP World would operate and manage one of the port’s four terminals, Homeland Security said.
—New Orleans: DP World would manage and operate two of the port’s five terminals, not including chemical-plant terminals along the Mississippi River, Homeland Security said.
—New York: DP World would manage and operate the New York Cruise Terminal, Homeland Security said.
—Norfolk, Va.: DP World would be involved with stevedoring activities at all five of the port’s terminals but would not manage any terminal, Homeland Security said.
—Philadelphia: DP World would operate one of the port’s five terminals, not including the port’s single cruise ship terminal, Homeland Security said. <cm-bd>¶
—Port Arthur, Texas: DP World would operate as one of three stevedoring companies, the director said.
—Portland, Maine: DP World would operate as one of the stevedoring companies that serves Portland’s terminals, and it would take over crane maintenance at one terminal, according to Portland’s director, Capt. Jeffrey W. Monroe.
—Tampa, Fla.: DP World would operate and manage some terminals under a pending contract Tampa’s port authority negotiated Feb. 21, but the port authority said it will reconsider the deal if DP World’s purchase of Peninsular & Oriental is finalized. DP World also would provide some stevedoring services.
—Wilmington, Del.: DP World would run some stevedoring operations as part owners of Delaware River Stevedores, one of two stevedoring companies at the port.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. ...
Edited on Mon Mar-06-06 07:52 PM by bullimiami
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. 6 no 21 no 22. Its all secure, oh DHS said no, Pentagon said no,
Coast Guard said no. 45 day review, no, sign it now.

Its a lie-a-minute porpoise show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. When we get control of all of theirs.... they can have control of
all of ours... fair's fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC