Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

After reading Robert Parry on Consortium News

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 02:40 PM
Original message
After reading Robert Parry on Consortium News
it appears that we in America have been duped for so long that the powers that be in Washington realize how easy it is to make laws that are counter to the well being of America since we out here listening to the nightly news are fed stuff we just eat up, no questions.

From Nixon and all of his arrogance and control to the Repub. back room, out of country deals to make Carter look like an idiot and flagrantly had the U.S. hostages in Iran released minutes after Regan's swearing in ceremony. Then Reagan's swell CIA dirty dealings in S. and Central America and Iran, and China nuclear info exchange (which later was blamed on Clinton!) while he was in control and smiling and lying (could be he didn't really know what was really happening, like bush II) with absolutely no one investigating. Investigations were stopped in their tracks. That is what total govt. control allows. Then Clinton gets trashed to the max and all the questions concerning Iran contra, CIA, get back room trashed for political purposes, one being Clinton's economic legislation. Parry is convinced that Clinton screwed up when he didn't follow through investigating Reagan and Bush, that the repubs took full advantage of it and screwed Cinton royally with the likes of Starr. Since then the Dems have been on the defensive and the repubs have run roughshod over them/us.

After reading many of Parry's articles dating back to 1999 it seems obvious we need a clean sweep of the House and Senate. The whole system is basically corrupt.

The Deans, Fingolds, Boxers, the Dem. from Ohio that just got told to step aside and let another Dem. run for Senator, sorry, his name escapes me, anyway they stand no chance against the powers in Washington. Whew, just had to vent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. thanks for the post
It is, indeed, a sad realization when one comes to know that much of our experience as Americans has over the last few decades been based on lies from those who hold the public trust. Even Bill Clinton sold us out on issues of trade and regulations. It's heartbreaking to be fully informed about all this. People like Parry have been blacklisted and shunned for telling the truth. Maybe there's a place in hell for those who abuse the public trust. But some blame has to lie on those citizens who've succumbed to apathy and the opiate lure of material comfort, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Blacklisted?
It seems he has the goods on how this democracy has been and is being run. When I want research on the latest news I go to his site. Who and how is he blacklisted? Since he isn't quoted much I have wonder why. He seems to know who's who in the zoo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Parry was the top investigative reporter on IranContra which also led to
BCCI. Bush1 kept pressuring Newsweek to dump him saying he was out of control and acting out a personal vendetta against Bush. Very weird reasoning, but it eventually wore down Newsweek.

Kerry was ostracized in DC throughout those investigations. He has always been slandered by the DC powerstructure insiders - GOP and Dems.

Gary Webb exposed the CIA drugrunning - Kerry, pretty much alone, stood with Webb and his story. Webb lost his job and soon after the election in 2004 committed "suicide"...???......he was counting on Kerry taking office and opening the books on the government corruption they all worked to expose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Parry sure could have used it if Clinton had opened the IranContra books
and the BCCI books. It would have proved all those reporters were dead on and no Bush would have ever been allowed NEAR the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plusfiftyfive Donating Member (337 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Actually, I have been thinking ...
About how we should just flush all 535 members of the House and Senate, send them home without any more pay, no pensions, no health care benefits other than those the Medicare folks get, and sue them all for back wages for a job they never performed, i. e. representing us!

Unfortunately, without a change in the laws, two thirds of the Senate would remain, so I am beginning to think we need a revolution... I am just so sick of the Dems and Reps appearing on TV trying to look like they really represent us!

If they had any sense and any brains they would.

1)
Eliminate any corporate finance of campaigns.
2)
Require all TV stations and networks to come up with a few hours every year for political campaigning....free airtime.

OH, and.......

3 Impeach Bush, Cheney and the whole crew and send them over to the FBI and Justice Department to face multiple charges for crimes and misdemeanors.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. No. 1 and 2 make all kinds of sense
No. 3 is a no brainer.

At one time in my voting life I thought that experience in govt. was a good thing. Course I also voted for repubs, duh. But there are so many games being played in Washington that it looks like John and Jane Q. public are forgotten 'cause we don't understand the ramifications of govt. and policy. But the biggest problem with our country is corporate rule, plain and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Your 1 and 2 were part of Clean Elections Bill by Kerry and Wellstone
back in 97. They had few standing with them. McCain-Feingold was the bill that ended up getting all the media attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. the entire system, repukes and dems alike, currently serves
corporations, not the people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. If you read Parry's work you would know that statement isn't true.
The problem is also that TOO MANY don't discern the important work and efforts of those anti-corruption lawmakersn who also seek to hold the corporations involved accountable.

They also don't know who are the few lawmaker advocates for public financing of campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R - Because everyone should read Parry.
Edited on Thu Mar-02-06 07:20 PM by blm
And, just to keep the story straight - Kerry was pretty much on his own when he looked into IranContra and especially after BCCI and again on CIA drugrunning.

You would be disheartened to find that at the time the Gov of Vermont supported Reagan's contra policies - many centrist Dms did - and you can't name many senators who helped Kerry on BCCI in the late 80s and 90s, or CIA drugrunning in the mid90s.

Imagine what our government would be like today if other powerful governors and senators chose to help Kerry expose all that government corruption and global terror networks instead of looking the other way and shunning his efforts.

Everything happening today is rooted in the people and events surrounding IranContra, BCCI and CIA drugrunning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I was surprised that Clinton was also pro-contra
I first read it in Stephanopolis' book when he was listing pros and cons in working on Clinton's 1992 campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Did Steph mention in his book why Clinton wouldn't open BCCI books?
I found it VERY strange that Clinton - a known political animal - wouldn't even MENTION one word about BCCI in his book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I don't think it was mentioned
Edited on Fri Mar-03-06 10:29 PM by karynnj
Even the contra thing was in the beggining of the book when GS was considering which candidate to work for. That was one of the "cons" for Clinton. I was really surprised to read that because over time I forgot that he was a pretty conservative Democrat. There is no mention of BCCI - that I could find - in Clinton's humongous biography.

Between BCCI and Contra drug running - I almost wonder if it weren't just Hillary's future that may have made Clinton seem not too unhappy when Kerry lost. Even if Kerry did nothing on those issues - which would surprise a lot of us - his being President would lead to at least some biographies. A serious biography of Kerry's Senate career could expose Clinton deficits that are currently not apparent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Considering that Clinton won because of bad IranContra and BCCI headlines
throughout Bush1's term, it really becomes an oddity that Clinton never even mentions BCCI in his book, and gives IranContra only passing references while using about 2 sentences to say he COULD have done more with the investigations but chose to give Bush1 a peaceful retirement.

What a crock. It is just too unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. It does seem kind of odd
and likely ties in with his strang ambivilence in describing why he supported Kerry over Weld. That he was the Democratic President and should want all the seats he can get should have sufficed. In listing Kerry's strengths he ignores the POW/MIA committee and opening Vietnam (which in other sections Clinton takes credit for), foreign policy and his investigations. (In a book coming out a month before Kerry's convention)

I actually begin to wonder if Clinton feared a Kerry Presidency damaging his reputation as much as the Bushes did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. hmm.. interesting. The Clintons are part fo the CFR gang...
CFR / BCCI /IMF etc..

hmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Steven Spielberg once said he was angry at how the entertainment industry
didn't embrace someone like John Kerry who he felt they should have done more for in 2003 and 2004. I wonder if the Clinton influence downplayed Kerry in that community, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Neo Liberalism /NAFTA = Neo Imperialism/Neo Colonialism / Neo Fascism.
Same as Neo Conservatism - only with a sweet smile instead of a smirk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. NOOO! Really!
"it appears that we in America have been duped for so long that the powers that be in Washington realize how easy it is to make laws that are counter to the well being of America since we out here listening to the nightly news are fed stuff we just eat up, no questions."

Let's just say the T. Roosevelt was the first U$ imperialist, I highly recommend Howard Zinn's: A People's History of the United States.

My Mexican relatives have witnessed first hand the effect of U$ imperialism from way back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Actually our Imperalism goes back a hundred years before
T. Roosevelt, but of course T. Roosevelt certainly took the manifest destiny to the extremes.

Must look pretty freaking lame to see a bunch of Gringos suddenly feel the pain of Neo Fascist oppression, that's been unleashed against indiginous peoples all over the world, and most especially right here in the Americas. I think about that a lot.

Unfortunately, still not enough see or feel the pain themselves yet, to get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Yes you are
the Monroe Doctrine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
21. It's gone on far longer than that....
...almost since the inception of the nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC