Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Possible theory about the "Hackett job".

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 12:13 AM
Original message
Possible theory about the "Hackett job".
If Rove's slimey fingerprints are on the whisper campain about Hackett here is one
possible reason.

With the mechanisms in place Rove can easily offset a large turnout of African-American
votes for Sherrod Brown. Shortages of machines, poll challenges, Voter ID, all will take a substantail bite out of Brown's support.

If Hackett had been the nominee then the potential centrist vote(middle class white) could
have swung the election and there would have been little Rover could have done short of machine tampering. It will be very easy for Rove and company to paint Brown as a bleeding heart liberal to the potential crossover voters thereby eliminating the one variable he could not control if Hackett was on the ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bluestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Black Vote?
You're not subscribing to Rush Limbaugh's mistaken announcement on the radio the other day that Sherrod Brown is African American, are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. No................ I know he is white.
Just saying Brown will probably generate more interest with African Americans than Hackett.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Skinner had an interesting post about it last week
He showed how Hackett just didn't have the numbers, both in fundraising and actual voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Nah, the primaries are in motion. The one who is more electable
will be supported. End of story. I don't like conspiracy theories, unless they apply! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. With All Due Respect,
Hackett was doing a pretty good job of eliminating the "potential centrist vote" all by himself.

I think what happened was that a lot of the DC party leadership thought they were getting a young, strong, appealing moderate candidate with impeccable military credentials who would play well across the board. Then Hackett began talking like an activist, equating evangelicals with Al Qaida and freaking out the people who gave him his ticket. They decided he had made himself unelectable.

I would rather have had the voters decide on whether Hackett should have been the nominee. He was treated shabbily. The leadership may have been wrong. But that seems to be the chain of events.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal43110 Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. No conspiracy here
The state Democratic party simply wanted to save money by avoiding a primary. Period. End of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC