Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What does Kerry have in common with JFK and Reagan?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ResistTheCoup Donating Member (385 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-04 09:36 AM
Original message
What does Kerry have in common with JFK and Reagan?
(Note: This post is food for thought only and is in no way intended to bash Kerry who is my number 2 choice and I will gladly vote for if he gets the nomination. Also, forgive me if both of these points have been discussed in the past here. If they have I've obviously missed them!)

Since Iowa and N.H. placed Kerry as the front-runner, the Feb. 2nd states seem to be falling into place behind his 'electability'. Since 'electability' seems to be the buzzword, statistically speaking, I'd like to know what the actual chances of Kerry's 'electability' in the General Election are.

IMO, looking at the statistics on past Presidents is one way to judge the possible 'electability' of a future candidate.

That being said, if Kerry is elected, he will become only the second Roman Catholic ever elected President (JFK has been the only one) and only the second divorced person ever to be elected President (Reagan presently holds that singular title).

http://www.heptune.com/preslist.html#religions
http://www.campvishus.org/PresMarriage.htm

Now, speaking as someone who was raised Catholic and is also divorced (and remarried), I've got no problems whatsoever with either statistic, nor am I trying to bash other Catholics (or any religion for that matter) or divorced people.

I just want to know what other DU'ers think about the chances of Kerry overcoming statistics and becoming not only the second divorced President and the second Roman Catholic President, but the first divorced, Roman Catholic President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-04 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. A hungry man is an angry man
Edited on Sun Feb-01-04 09:42 AM by BeatleBoot
It's the economy and its Democratic turnout.

The religion thing probably won't be much of a factor.

Southern states probably won't vote for him anyway.

For the Reagan Dems in my neck of the woods, the RC thing is a plus.


on edit: spelling :7

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-04 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. i don't think those matter anymore
bob dole was divorced when he ran but his loss had nothing to do with him being divorced. it wasn't even an issue. i see the same way with the religion thing. especially since joe lieberman ran on the national ticket and is jewish. also, i think those who would not vote for someone based on them being catholic would most likely not vote democratic anyways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-04 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. You're absolutely correct n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EXE619K Donating Member (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-04 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. I wonder if....
The recent scandals of the Catholic church might have some effect on this year's campaign.

Something to think about.

Note: This is not a "smear" on candidate Kerry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-04 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. Was Reagan's divorce an issue?
I don't remember anyone bringing it up.

The Repubs are floating the accusation that Kerry womanizes rich widows for monetary gain. I'd like to think that won't stick, but Bush's method is to make outlandish claims, because they are the hardest to fight against, and because the media won't correct him, anyway.

So if Kerry's marriage history becomes a factor, that's how. As for the divorce, it won't come up much. Half of all marriages end in divorce. That's a lot of divorcees who could be alienated. Plus, women's abuse groups would accuse Bush of wanting women to stay in abusive marriages, and it could cause him problems.

Bush will stick to big, false accusations, since false accusations can't be disproven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC