Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Specter wants special court to supervise surveillance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 09:53 PM
Original message
Specter wants special court to supervise surveillance
A special federal court would be given power to supervise the Bush administration's warrantless surveillance program under a bill being written by a key Senate Republican.

Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said in an interview Wednesday that he wants to "assert Congress' constitutional authority" while allowing the anti-terrorism program to continue under court supervision.

Specter said he hopes to work with President Bush on the bill but is trying to build a bipartisan coalition to override a potential presidential veto.

Bush and Specter haven't discussed the bill, White House spokesman Scott McClellan said. On Monday, Specter held a Judiciary Committee hearing in which he and other senators told Attorney General Alberto Gonzales they had doubts about the program's legality.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-02-08-eavesdroping-congress_x.htm?csp=N009


I guess if you don't like the rules, just change them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep
:mad: UGH! Specter is letting him get away with doing something illegal! I CAN'T BELIEVE THIS! MAGIC BULLET MAN IS AT IT AGAIN! Sorry for yelling but I'm so freakin pissed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. You should be pissed...
I believe they will use this as a way to portray FISA court as elementally "flawed" and then excuse the outrageous actions that have been taken.

This smells very bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gee, I guess that means...
... that the FISA court wasn't really a court at all. :shrug:

Now we have to create a new court with Constitutional standards low enough to suit Bush....

Specter's a dolt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
feelthebreeze Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. it is not any less a crime against Democracy and my rights...
Edited on Thu Feb-09-06 10:01 PM by feelthebreeze
if you do it under any pretense. If you wish to continue to serve in a Democracy, you must act like it is a Democracy. I have zero trust or faith in any act that is devised by such a corrupted group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. We've already got just such a law -- Enforce it!
Impeach the treasonous bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. But,...don't they already have one.....???
the special court that * ignored. FISA....I wonder what they'll call the new one...these people are miserable excuses for human beings...We need our own government...screw this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. We already have a special court - FISA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Specter is fascism-friendly...
The only reason he's been upset is because the administration disrespected congress in this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. Disgusting...figured this would happen. More Bush Big Government
to create another agency and emply more of your cronies when you are criticized. It's the Corporate P-Residency. Create a new study group to cover your butt....:puke:

And Specter is a toady whore..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. I wonder if Specter will regret his vote for Alito if the spy program ever
gets to the SC...

Although I'm glad he's doing this, I just don't trust him. Has anyone got any further info on why he didn't swear Gonzales in during the recent hearings? I haven't heard any explanation by Specter for that action, which I understand was very unusual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. umm - FISA already exists... * refused to use it, why think he would use
another one?

:wtf:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. CALL YOUR CONGRESSCRITTERS!!!!!
we must keep them alert - we must keep calling.

They have to know we are aware and watching them.

The MUST KNOW we hold them accountable.

CALL THEM ON FRIDAY, LET THEM KNOW THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE.

(stepping off soapbox, and slinking away...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. We Already Have a Special Court For That: The FISA Court
Bush** already has the power to do all the surveillance he wants under the supervision of the FISA court.
He can even do it without a warrant, as long as he applies for a warrant soon after-the-fact.

The FISA Court IS the special court for this purpose!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC