Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Massachusetts, The Stigma State

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:25 PM
Original message
Massachusetts, The Stigma State
With All That Political Baggage, How Far Can Its Candidates Go?

Michael S. Dukakis is on the phone. He sounds annoyed.

The former Democratic presidential nominee is asked if being from Massachusetts contributed to his defeat in 1988 and whether it will hurt the candidacy of his former lieutenant governor, John Kerry. Dukakis does not like the conceit.

"It's absolute nonsense," he says. "We had a great president named John F. Kennedy who was from Massachusetts. I didn't lose because I came from Massachusetts. I lost because I ran a lousy campaign against George H.W. Bush."

The latter point is widely agreed upon. The former is not.

Because in fact, no state carries as much political baggage as Massachusetts, the perceived liberal outpost and home to several failed presidential candidates of recent vintage (Dukakis, Ted Kennedy, Paul Tsongas).

source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A1790-2004Jan31.html?nav=hptoc_p
_____________________________________________________________________

Is being from Massachusetts a fatal flaw? What states are "acceptable" for Presidential candidates to be from? And should I end sentences with prepositions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Vermont is no better
Edited on Sat Jan-31-04 11:41 PM by Bombtrack
it's electorate is probably seen as more fringe-like than Massachusetts, and much, much smaller. There's a reasons people call Vermont an "obscure" state and not Massachusetts. It's the second smallest in population. It elects a socialist congressman, Pat Leahy and Jim Jeffords. Also civil unions, Ben and Jerry, and Phish.

Whether it was a right-winger who said it or not, I forget, but someone said many people might think it was a Canadian province. And I think that's a cogent point

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. True
So, should Presidents only come from, say, Ohio, or Texas, or Virginia, or New York, or California? Can any candidate ever win if not from the "right" state? This drives me nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. A nom could win from any state, but that doesn't mean it's not an issue
a very big issue. The best state a democrat could come from in this day and age would definetly be Florida. In the 70's and 80's the best state a republican could have come from is California.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lcordero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Vermont sounds like a paradise
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Not to most people. As a liberal, I'd rather live in Texas than Vermont
and I'm from Massachusetts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Mass has had 4 straight Republican governors; it's not liberal anymore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Virginia mixes governors but we're a republican state
people will vote up or down to manage state taxation and act totally differently when thinking nationally.

MASS is poison on the national level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackcat77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's all baloney
Clinton was from Arkansas and they didn't like that either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Uh no, Clinton split the south twice and won Arizona and Nevada
It's very doubtful that Paul Tsongas could have done that.

He benefited greatly from coming from a southern/middle american state
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fairfaxvadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. what a bunch of junk that is.
Massachusetts, or as the right-wing likes to call it "The Peoples' Republic of Massachusetts" has given this country some of its greatest patriots. Living in "aristocratic" Virginia and all THAT baggage (tax laws that still reflect an agrarian economy, a Republican legislature that still thinks we're fighting the Civil War, etc.), I'll take whatever baggage assigned to Mass in a heartbeat. Yes, I know the Commonwealth of VA (Mass also being a Commonwealth) gave us TJ, GW, Mason, Madison, etc., but no one of note since the founding of the country.

At least Massachusetts is still producing some solid political leaders in the modern era, which is more than I can say of my state, who sends idiots like George Allen to the Senate. Our only hope right now is our governor, otherwise, Dems have very little influence in this state.

I would consider Massachusetts extremely lucky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackcat77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. "Taxachusetts" is what I've heard it called nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fairfaxvadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. maybe it is Taxachusetts.
But why aren't folks rebelling against the taxes or leaving in droves? Same for NY State. Not exactly a cheap place. And yet I would say that my relatives who live north of Albany have a better quality of life than I do living outside of DC on many levels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mot78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. They've elected nothing but Repug Governors for the last ten years!!
Ever heard of Mitt Romeny?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. only because the people don't want complete autocracy
Democrats have about 90 percent of the legislature I believe. And every person in the congressional delegation is a liberal democrat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. After Nixon won re-election against George McGovern,

with McGovern carrying only Massachusetts, two bumper stickers became popular.

One was "Don't Blame Me, I Voted For McGovern"
(the first "Don't Blame Me'" slogan, I think.)

The other was "Massachusetts: The Lone Star State."

:7 :7 :7 :7 :7


A Democrat will be criticized and called a liberal no matter where he's from.

Yet we manage to win rather often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC