Let me help you out, then. Here are the ones I've saved:
January 31, 2004
Democrats Assail, and Tap, 'Special Interests'By GLEN JUSTICE and JOHN TIERNEY
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/31/politics/campaign/31DONA.html?pagewanted=print&position=While Senator John Kerry regularly promises to stand up to "big corporations," his campaign has taken money from executives on Wall Street and those representing the telecommunications industry, which is under his purview in Congress. Mr. Kerry denounces President Bush for catering to the rich, but he has depended more heavily on affluent donors than the other leading Democrats except for another populist, Senator John Edwards. Mr. Kerry's spokeswoman, Stephanie Cutter, said the contributions had no effect on his votes.
Note: That's pretty much what they all say, isn't it?Kerry raps K StreetBut senator cozy with lobbyists, too
By Alexander Bolton
http://www.thehill.com/news/011404/kerry.aspxTo energize his flagging presidential campaign, Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) has taken recently to denouncing inside-the-Beltway corruption and influence peddling.
Last Friday in New Hampshire, he railed against the influence of lobbyists and pledged to shine light “on the secret deals in Washington.”
But during his Senate career, Kerry has helped special interests, even against the apparent interests of his own constituents. This helped cement ties with lobbyists who donated thousands of dollars to his campaign.
Looks like the same wink, wink, nod, nod type of tough talk George W. Bush engages in.Kerry Leads in Lobby Money Anti-Special-Interest Campaign Contrasts With Funding
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A64727-2004Jan30.html?nav=hptop_tbBy Jim VandeHei
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, January 31, 2004; Page A01
Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.), who has made a fight against corporate special interests a centerpiece of his front-running campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination, has raised more money from paid lobbyists than any other senator over the past 15 years, federal records show.
Looks like a pattern to me. The kind they call hypocrisy. It's definitely a fair campaign issue. He is, after all, the one who touts a record that just isn't there. Speaking of which, here's yet another little bit of inflation from Kerry:Kerry Exaggerates Role in Some Key Legislative Battles He says he "led the fight" on several fronts, but few bills bear his name.
January 30, 2004
Modified: January 30, 2004
http://factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=134Summary
John Kerry is fond of saying "I led the fight" on a lot of things -- against Arctic drilling, against Bush's Medicare prescription drug legislation, for federal grants for 100,000 new police officers, against Newt Gingrich's attempts to lessen environmental regulations.
But reporters who cover Congress often gave others credit for the leading roles in some of those fights -- with scant mention of Kerry.
And The Associated Press last July found that only eight laws had Kerry as their lead sponsor, five of them "ceremonial," two relating to the fishing industry, and one providing federal grants to support small businesses owned by women.
Maybe that's yet another lesson Kerry has learned from GWB -- you can say anything you want and most people won't know it's a bald-faced lie, esp. since we have a lazy stenography press nowadays It was GWB's father, btw, who once said (paraphrasing, probaby), "Who cares if you say something not true on TV? Millions of people see it, and only several thousand see the correction." A real man of integrity, that Kerry.