http://www.buzzflash.com/mailbag/06/02/mai06041.html-snip-
Subject: Iraqi Hostage Wives
Hi, Buzz!!
The fact that the U.S. is now taking insurgents' wives hostage in Iraq is yet another proof that our so-called "leaders" don't know their history. Our army has done that before; it didn't work then, and it won't work now.
Before Kansas statehood (when the territory was so inflamed with terrorism that it was called "bleeding Kansas"), the army decided to arrest and hold female relatives of the guerrillas operating here, to force them to change their wicked ways. I can't imagine why anyone thought we could reform people like William Clarke Quantrill, but they tried. Initially, the hostage-taking had no effect whatsoever on guerrilla activities, but then the building the women were held in collapsed. Some of the hostages were killed outright, others were maimed, and some were injured less seriously. The guerrillas went ballistic, and burned the city of Lawrence (now home to the University of Kansas). So much for hostage-taking as a means of calming people down.
Of course, taking noncombatants hostage is immoral. But, on a practical level, it simply doesn't work, and can actually make matters worse. Why don't Bush's people ever think about the consequences of what they do? Are they twelve years old? Have they all fried their brains with some drug or other and lost the ability to consider their actions?
Or do they just have no plan at all, and are therefore grasping at any straw that comes by on the wind?
Bush needs to be impeached, the sooner the better.
Jane Hawes
Emporia, KS (red-state Democrat)
-snip-
-------------------------------
the nipple full of milk is valuable property
men seem to think it belongs to them