Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Perhaps saying that "Pelosi sucks!" was too strong

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:03 PM
Original message
Perhaps saying that "Pelosi sucks!" was too strong
Edited on Tue Jan-31-06 11:29 PM by IndianaGreen
On CNN saying how great Kaine was and why Iraq wasn't mentioned.

CNN, Anderson Cooper.

On edit:

I said Pelosi sucks on the aftermath of Kaine's speech, knowing that it was Pelosi and Reid that picked a man that has been governor for only 18 days to deliver the response to the SOTU. A tactical and strategic mistake all around, made worse by a speech that was obviously put together by focus groups.

I wish Kerry or Kennedy had given the response!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Um... I don't get it.
Why, exactly, would you expect Pelosi to *not* say that kaine was great?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I expect her to attack Bush just as Kerry just did
in his response to Bush's SOTU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. She was pretty rough on him - but focused on what Democrats want to do
We'll get nowhere if all we do is bash Bush - we have to offer an alternative to him.

Bill Clinton used to say that running for office is like a job interview. First you have to convince the employwer that wants to get rid of the guy who has the job. But then you have to convince him to hire YOU to replace him. Otherwise, he'll just keep the other guy until something better comes along.

The Democrats have to be hard on Bush, but that can't be the entire strategy - we have to show the voters why they need to replace him with Democrats. And the only way to do that is to offer our own vision beyond "We hate Bush."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Let's take Bush's dare on the NSA spying
Bush dared the Democrats to stop him from breaking the law. How can anyone let that one slide?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. No shit! He's been DOUBLE DARING us ever since he admitted
doing it!

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Here is Kerry's speech, Skinner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
24. Two weeks ago
Most of these people would have been horrified if Kerry were suggested to give the response. They were also thrilled when a Democrat won governor of Virginia. They don't want to be shoved in the attic like crazy Aunt Lula, but don't understand that the moderate Democrats don't like it either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Just curious. why was Iraq not mentionned?
For kaine, she is one of those who chose him. She is not going to tell us that he did poorly. Who knows, may be he did better for the intended target than he did for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Maybe because he's a governor and he focused on the domestic
issues and leaves it up to the Members of Congress to focus on foreign policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. If you wanted a Governor, Jennifer Granholm would have been fine
There are far better choices to give the response, and better speeches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. The guy who just kicked ass in a red state and is about to turn it blue
Edited on Tue Jan-31-06 11:21 PM by beaconess
is a pretty good choice - especially since Granholm's approval numbers are about where Bush's are.

But it's easy to second guess this choice - no matter who they picked, somebody would bitch about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. He did mention Iraq
Edited on Tue Jan-31-06 11:14 PM by ProSense
He spoke about the troops and the war on terror and how it was it was being poorly executed, specifically mentioned that VA (Petagon) was attacked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Iraq
He also mentioned that the admin lied to us with re: to the reasons we went into Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrgorth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. I can't believe I'm seeing this
Iraq WAS mentioned. However, there is NOT unity in the party on whether we should have gone in or not. What there IS unity on is the poor management, so that's what was focused on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. The second guessing and micromanaging is pretty amazing in here
No wonder Dems are having trouble getting traction - crabs in a barrel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. great metaphor!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. This bothers me. None of our Democrats "suck".
Some are more irritating and ineffective than others. I am not fond of Kaine because he inserts too much religiosity into office, but I am glad he won. I don't like that he is not fair to the gay community.

I did not hear Pelosi, but I doubt she "sucks."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-01-06 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. Kaine himself probably doesn't "suck" but his speech, delivery and message
did. He came across as a GOP lite robot! We have so many people who can really speak we should use them. But the DNC and the Leadership wanted the "centrist" message out here. I disagree with it a a vote getter.JMHO>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigYawn Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. Pelosi looked radiant and cheerful....
I thought she looked "hot". And nothing wrong with
the PR effect of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. She looked "hot'?
She wore a nice red dress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigYawn Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I am a sucker for red dresses LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. I adore Kerry and Kennedy, but SOTU night is NOT the night to shore
up the base - they're playing to a different audience, and as much as we love our liberal lions, they would be the wrong people to carry the message tonight.

Kaine was a good choice and did a nice job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. it's pretty clear it was an "in your face" choice
since he was the most recently elected Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
21. Thanks for editing. Appreciated. I agree with most of your post.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC