|
My approach here has nothing to do with engaging existing voter potential or perceived stereotypes or campaign budget management; thought I'd clear that up first.
The Southern States have become "home" territory for the GOP. So now they can strike out with needle and pin campaigns elsewhere, playing into the middleclass fears and insecurities, while keeping a "robust" and "trustworthy" appearance.
Clearly, this won't do.
So, why not take the battlefield for the Democratic primary (and beyond, the nomination!) to the South, so as to compel the conservos to respond with very aggressive and "necessarily" harsh ads - which can then be served as raw omelettes in their face up North, wedging their middle class support out as ut doesn't like it at all when they air their ugly and nasty stuff about gays and abortion and the rest of the usual topics?
Yes, I just watched NPR's interview with Ed Carter and dang, he has a point.
I think it'd be brilliant to sap the saps. Spend a little there among the Democratic candidates, hopefully with additional air power from MoveOn, and put up a clever decentralized but locally intense guerrilla fight, slow and pin 'em down there, and then nail 'em nationwide with repeated replays of their inevitable napalm tactics, as the "untrustworthy" and "ugly" ones: time for a Clean Break, vote the Democrat.
As far as I can tell, the alternate reaction (say, because GOP operatives read this) of responding in a cavalier manner will likely result in "simple" large gains by the Democrats - because it's still the economy stupid, and we can smash 'em on that issue, hands down.
Well?
I haven't been smoking, honest, but I'm going for a cigarette now.
|