Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I Finally Connected the Dots... Why is Porn a Top Priority for Gonzales???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Peter Frank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 06:07 AM
Original message
I Finally Connected the Dots... Why is Porn a Top Priority for Gonzales???


With all the huge international and internal issues facing America -- why would our Attorney General make internet porn a top priority?

When FBI supervisors in Miami met with new interim U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta last month, they wondered what the top enforcement priority for Acosta and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales would be.

Would it be terrorism? Organized crime? Narcotics trafficking? Immigration? Or maybe public corruption?

The agents were stunned to learn that a top prosecutorial priority of Acosta and the Department of Justice was none of the above. Instead, Acosta told them, it's obscenity. Not pornography involving children, but pornographic material featuring consenting adults.<snip>

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1125318960389



And there's this:

Recruits Sought for Porn Squad
By Barton GellmanWashington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, September 20, 2005; Page A21

The FBI is joining the Bush administration's War on Porn. And it's looking for a few good agents. Early last month, the bureau's Washington Field Office began recruiting for a new anti-obscenity squad. Attached to the job posting was a July 29 Electronic Communication from FBI headquarters to all 56 field offices, describing the initiative as "one of the top priorities" of Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales and, by extension, of "the Director." That would be FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III.

Mischievous commentary began propagating around the water coolers at 601 Fourth St. NW and its satellites, where the FBI's second-largest field office concentrates on national security, high-technology crimes and public corruption.

The new squad will divert eight agents, a supervisor and assorted support staff to gather evidence against "manufacturers and purveyors" of pornography -- not the kind exploiting children, but the kind that depicts, and is marketed to, consenting adults.

"I guess this means we've won the war on terror," said one exasperated FBI agent, speaking on the condition of anonymity because poking fun at headquarters is not regarded as career-enhancing. "We must not need any more resources for espionage."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/19/AR2005091901570.html



Still confused? Well, so was I until I saw this (thank you Newsjock for your LBN post -- http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2050453):



How clear does this have to become? Under the ruse of checking pornography, this administration is attempting to gain control of the internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spooked Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Here's where you CAN see what people are searching for REAL TIME
http://www.dogpile.com/info.dogpl/searchspy/results.htm?fci=1?filter=0&qcat=web

It's the SearchSpy feature at www.dogpile.com

You can "watch" people's "filtered" or "unfiltered" search terms.

BEWARE...this link is to the UNFILTERED version.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. The repubs seem to have a big problem with sex. Just look at
their desire to get rid of abortions, but no desire to help people with children. Porn is something everyone is against. However, there is no real definition of it because the Consitition allows free speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Porn is NOT something EVERYONE is against
Millions of healthy responsible adults enjoy adult entertainment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is absolutely about spying on people
and using the evidence to put people away with no record of where they've been imprisoned, no attorney, no charges, no habeus corpus.

This is about fascism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. How can anyone keep all this stuff straight?
Karl is spitting out new plays by the minute.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Perhaps, but this is a longtime mission of the FBI.
If you see the documentary "Inside Deep Throat" (Excellent, by the way, and Netflix has the NC-17 version), it features the guy that went after the movie Deep Throat, its actors, and its distribution network, and said that basically, "if terror ever cools down, we'll be able to crack down on porn again."

He's so giddy about it, you can tell he's disappointed by the fact that terrorism has gotten in the way of the real enemy.

It caps the movie, and is hilarious, if a bit disturbing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC