Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gore doesn't support Alito. What does that remind me of?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 01:02 PM
Original message
Gore doesn't support Alito. What does that remind me of?
Edited on Mon Jan-16-06 01:03 PM by onehandle
Oh, yeah. Thanks, Ralph.

Thanks for the next 30 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, Please!
Stop blaming Ralph Nader -- and I volunteered for and voted for Gore in 2000.

Get this through your skull: Al Gore WON.

George W. Bush STOLE THE ELECTION!

Nothing makes the corporate news media and the radical Republicans happier than progressives continuing to be distracted from the central fact that, despite the Nader votes -- GORE WON -- BUSH STOLE THE ELECTION.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Actually both. However if only one had failed, Gore would have won.
Nader worked tirelessly in Florida to be a spoiler. If half a percent of the people who voted for Nader had voted for Gore (and voting models say that many more would have), Gore would have overcome the Bush fix in the courts.

Since then, the toe that the GOP has in the electoral wheels has become a bearhug.

I say again: Thanks, Ralph.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
European Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Pukes were going to take Florida--no matter what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Okay, NH then.
In NH, Nader took far more votes than Bush's margin of victory over Gore.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
European Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I heard Pat Buchanan cost Bush Iowa in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Exactly.
Edited on Mon Jan-16-06 07:22 PM by ih8thegop
Bush's victory: 527 votes

Nader's vote: ~100,000 votes

Just 1% of Nader voters needed to vote for Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-16-06 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC