Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TIMELINE: Kennedy/Specter Communication

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sweetm2475 Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 10:46 PM
Original message
TIMELINE: Kennedy/Specter Communication

TIMELINE: Kennedy/Specter Communication About Concerned Alumni of Princeton Documents

As provided by Senator Kennedy’s Office:

Chronology of Exchange Between Kennedy and Specter Offices on Rusher Documents

November 30, 2005: Senator Kennedy requests Congressional Research Service to ask Rusher’s permission to examine CAP documents at Library of Congress.

Week of December 5, 2005: Rusher turns down CRS request.

December 22, 2005: Senators Kennedy sends letter to Senator Specter asking for Committee request of Rusher documents. Delivered by hand to Judiciary Committee.

Date unknown prior to 1/5/06: Kennedy staff and Specter staff discuss December 22 request.

January 5, 2006, 7:29 pm: Kennedy staff request status report from Specter staff on request regarding Rusher documents.

January 5, 2006 7:50 pm: Specter staff replies that they are not inclined to grant request because they are personal documents.

January 6, 2006, 12:01 am: Kennedy staff asks Specter staff to reconsider on basis that there are not personal documents but business records of a very public organization.

January 11, 2006: Senator Specter says he’s unaware of the request.

After all this, Specter lectured Kennedy about his conduct regarding the request.

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/01/11/cap-timeline/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Specter says he's unaware of the request?
lying fuck.
or, as Pat Robertson would say, 'he bore false witness. take him to the gates of the city and stone him.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. a moderate Repug is still a republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetm2475 Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-11-06 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. So true, everytime i think i can let my guard down and think
one of these guys isn't so bad, just different political views, that's all, then SMACK! I wake up and realize I fell off the bed.:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC