|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Maraya1969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 06:03 PM Original message |
WTF - "stari decicus"??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
1. Settled Law----Roe Vs. Wade. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlipperySlope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 06:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Settled Law ---- Dred Scott v. Sandford |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlipperySlope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
2. "look at the decision" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
3. basically latin for "precedents matter" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rusty charly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
4. Stare decisis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sandpiper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
5. It's Stare Decisis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trof (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
6. Alito doing the Fred Astaire on abortion. Schumer won't let go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlipperySlope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 06:09 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. What would be the HONEST answer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trof (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 06:10 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. It is SUCH a game. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlipperySlope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 06:19 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Schumer should just quote the part of the constitution protecting abortion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tn-guy (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 08:09 PM Response to Reply #13 |
23. That would be a problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlipperySlope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 08:19 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. That was my point... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trof (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
9. Under stare decisis I guess we'd still have slavery? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sandpiper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 06:15 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. You're not far off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr. Blonde (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 06:55 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. Brown didn't overturn Plessy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beaconess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 09:37 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. Brown expressly overturned Plessy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newscott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 06:20 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Didn't the Constitution call for it's eventual elimination? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ISUGRADIA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 06:24 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Only eventual end to the slave trade, not slavery itself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trof (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
11. Is it like "We do it this way because we've always done it this way"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 06:24 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Not quite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trof (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 06:26 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Thanks for the clarification. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tn-guy (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 08:14 PM Response to Reply #16 |
24. The practical benefit is simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 06:28 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. but there is always the compelling reason to change |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zulchzulu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
19. It was a disco band in the '70's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 06:48 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. have you been waiting for just the right moment to use that image? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-10-06 07:10 PM Response to Original message |
22. Here tis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC