Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Monica, We Need You Now

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RJnAbbysNana Donating Member (161 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 04:41 PM
Original message
Monica, We Need You Now
Edited on Sat Dec-31-05 04:42 PM by RJnAbbysNana

Monica, We Need You Now


by Joan Chittister
Published on Saturday, December 31, 2005 by the National Catholic Reporter



Christmas parties for board members can be very uncomfortable, if not downright difficult. Nobody knows anyone very well. Once you've approved the budget for the year, what's left to talk about that's safe enough to risk in a mixed crowd? Finding something familiar enough to generate real conversation among people who come from so many different backgrounds and walks of life is no small feat. Better usually just to swig the tiny glass of sherry, finish the strange-tasting canapé politely and suddenly remember that you have to leave early to get to the store before it closes.

But not at the party this year.

At this Christmas party everyone -- whoever they were, wherever they were from -- began talking about the latest breaking news story on the latest White House scandal. Surprisingly enough, though, the overall tone of the conversation, unlike most political discussion in mixed company these days, was not argumentative. Instead, the general response was a kind of quiet dismay. Faulty intelligence, misinterpreted intelligence -- exaggerated, insufficient, decades-old intelligence -- was one thing. Spying on the American public in sweeping, unspecified, unmonitored fishing expeditions, however, was entirely another.

One woman put it this way: "Where is Monica Lewinsky when we need her?" Nobody laughed. The comment made the point: There are scandals and then there are scandals.

It's one kind of scandal when a president cannot control a need for sexual satisfaction. What the moral theologians have traditionally called "the sins of the flesh" -- as in "the spirit is willing but the flesh is weak" -- most often carries an overtone of human weakness, a lack of personal discipline or emotional maturity or psychological control of sexual impulses.

It's another kind of scandal when a president cannot control a need for power. Deceit, spuriousness, pride and calculated dishonesty fall into the category of "sins of the spirit." These are not confined to private or personal sexual behaviors. "Sins of the spirit" have to do with intellectual malice, with the cultivation of behavior and attitudes that attack the very ideals of the human community and pollute a whole way of being alive. This day's scandal yielded no ordinary political conversation. The group wrestled with the problem. Didn't the attack on the World Trade Center demand a more intense kind of intelligence gathering? Didn't the president have the responsibility to do this? Wasn't it imperative that it be done?

Yes, yes, and yes. The answers came easily, it seemed. Then what was the problem? A continuing discomfort hung in the air; something begged to be said yet. People put their eyes down and bit at the inside of their lips.

Then a woman dared the breach: "We may need to do this kind of thing -- but not like this. Not without legal permission, not without the approval of the Congress. Not in the United States of America. We elected a president. Not a king."

The idea may bear remembering.

cont..........

http://www.commondreams.org/views05/1231-03.htm

In considering Shrub's sins with respect to his pResidency, it might be wise to remember that, in addition to all of his criminal behavior, it has also been rumored that there is something going on between The Vampire and himself which, according to the GOP's handling of the Clinton-Lewinski indiscretion, is a more grievious sin.

In a speech a while back, Condi inadvertently referred to Shrub as her "husband;" and I thought at the time that, perhaps, it might be wise to launch an investigation into that relationship, because the American public gets much more excited about an alleged sex scandal than it seemingly does about actual criminal behavior such as we've witnessed during Shrub's "regime" thus far.

Of course, these are just the "musings" of an old lady and nothing remarkable.

Regards,

RJnAbbysNana


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Count your votes closely and be prepared to vote out all those who
are guilty of

Iraq
Katrina
Deficits
Defense Budget Deficits
NSA spying
Budgets that give tax breaks to oil companies
Budgets that give huge tax breaks to the wealthy

Go for it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. A minor nitpick
I believe the story about Condi was related in a gossip column and it was something she allegedly let slip over dinner.

Having said that, an investigation into that relationship would, as you note, capture the public's imagination. It would be extremely hypocritical of me though to support it because I believe that the personal life is a personal life and should not be criminalized like they repubs did to Clinton.

oh yes, a belated welcome to DU :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indy_Dem_Defender Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. More Gossip
Edited on Sat Dec-31-05 05:02 PM by Indy_Dem_Defender
I've always heard the rumor Rice was gay, if she is or not I don't care. I've also heard she is very close friends with Harriet Miers, makes one wonder 2 women over 50 never married never or ever in any serious relationships with men and both are really close to Bush as well. :shrug: I don't know am I the only one seeing something there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RJnAbbysNana Donating Member (161 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Of course, there are also rumors of this:


and this:


and even this:


Regards,

RJnAbbysNana
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. well that could be. harriet and condi and bush watching them. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indy_Dem_Defender Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I wasn't thinking of him watching
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. well i'm probably going to be flamed, but i was not surprised
about the spying. i was under the impression that this was happening since 9/11. now on the other hand, if junior is doing this illegally then he must answer for it.

and yes, if he and condi are getting it on, it should be made public and he should be put through the same ordeal as clinton went through which i personally thought was ridiculous. i swear ken starr got off when he was writing that report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorkiemommie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. re: ken starr got off when he was writing that report

that's what i've been saying for years. he, and all the repressed, but outwardly devout rw'ers must have salivated over every detail. it was officially sanctioned porn. ' hmmm... let's go back over that detail again ..'

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. As soon as I fix my highball
I may come up with a clever response. until then, I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. As Mike Malloy has said
repeatedly on his AAR show: "Why doesn't somebody just give him a blow job so we can impeach him?" SG
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RJnAbbysNana Donating Member (161 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yuck!
The thought of that is enough to make me :puke:

Regards,

RJnAbbysNana
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yeah, I agree
about the nauseating image that idea calls up! SG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorkiemommie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. if i summon up that image every time i think of eating....

i'll drop 10 pounds in no time, lol!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. gee. i leave my computer for a few hours and i miss out on
Edited on Sat Dec-31-05 11:31 PM by catmother
all this. yes, what a great way to lose weight. i'll make it easier for you. he probably has smelly balls. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. And there is always this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-31-05 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. A CATHOLIC Magazine
Guys... the point is that this is being discussed in a CATHOLIC magazine. You know, the Catholics supposedly supported * because he was anti-choice? Maybe they're wising up and getting back to their liberation theology roots?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC