Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here are the specific laws Bush broke with his warrant-less wiretaps.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 11:43 AM
Original message
Here are the specific laws Bush broke with his warrant-less wiretaps.
The reason Bush needed to give his little speech today was because he knows he's in a lot of hot water right now. Ordering a warrant-less wiretap is a major breach of federal law and public trust. The material below was compiled by Doug De Clue, one of the bloggers at Brainshrub.com:

Which laws were broken when President Bush authorized the NSA to wiretap without a warrant.

Listening in without a warrant isn't just impolite, it's a felony.

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (USC Title 50 Chapter 36 Subchapter 1) specifically prohibits the government from doing what the President has secretly ordered and it is a serious felony with major penalties.

The President has publicly confessed to this felony on national television. He ordered government agencies to engage in spying on thousands of American citizens without a warrant when the Congress made specific provisions in law to cover all circumstances, even emergency situations so that the government could listen in for up to 72 hours before obtaining a warrant, plenty of time to find and convince a judge.

There is no excuse for this action, yet the President has done so anyways.

That the President has colluded with others to do so, also makes this a conspiracy subject to fine and imprisonment up to 5 years per count under USC TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 19 § 371.

<snip>


Entire article at: http://www.brainshrub.com/president-wiretap





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Silly, don't you know that Bush can do anything he wants, any time
he wants, with NO CONSEQUENCES?? If he does it, by definition that makes it legal. He is above the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. But if he authorized this, there is nowhere to hide.
With everything else Bush has done, there has been a level of plausible deny-ability.

A few examples:
9/11 - The president was just as surprised as everyone.
Iraq - The intelligence was bad.
Torture - A few bad apples working independently.
Plame leak - An underling leaked the information.

However, with the wiretaps Bush directly implicated himself. There is nowhere to hide, and he knows it.

At the very least, it means that he will be open to lawsuits from citizens who he has illegally used his office to spy on.

I'm not so optimistic that this is going to bring the House of Bush down, but it could be a major hassle for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks. There is no shade of grey on this issue.
I don't think DUers understand how important this law is. There is no shade of grey on this issue.

From a legal and political standpoint, warrantless wiretaps would be like finding out that Bush hasn't been paying his paying taxes for the last ten years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. well damn it then, I am kicking again. . .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-19-05 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC