Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush nominating Viveca Novak's husband to FEC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 04:55 PM
Original message
Bush nominating Viveca Novak's husband to FEC
http://firedoglake.blogspot.com/2005_12_01_firedoglake_archive.html#113485007313391863

George W. Bush has picked new nominees for the FEC. One is a Republican, Hans von Spakovsky, whom Ted Kennedy says "may be at the heart of the political interference that is undermining the Department's enforcement of federal civil laws." And in an uncharacteristic moment of cheerful bipartisanship, Bush is also appointing a Democrat, Robert D. Lenhard, who was quite helpful to the 1600 Crew as part of the legal team that challenged the constitutionality of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law.

But there is perhaps another reason why Mr. Lenhard is being rewarded by BushCo. at just this moment. He's the husband of Viveca Novak, whose testimony now provides the foundation for Karl Rove's defense in the CIA leak case.

A small but rather key fact that both the Washington Post and the White House Press Release manages to leave out, wouldn't you say? They WaPo is having quite a stint in the GOP stenography department this week, it would seem.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. How does one spell " P A Y O F F" ?
just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. crony
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. No way!
This is bullshit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Quid Pro Quo. Indict him, too.
The White House is really sticking its head in the lion's mouth with this one.

Do they think this is 2003, or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Holy Cow!!
:wow:

Just when I think these people can do nothing more to surprise me!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reciprocity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well now this explains a lot. nominated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Time had damn well better have something to say about this
absolutely blatant arrogance by Time's reporter as well as Bush. Time will have NO credibility left whatsoever and they damn well know it. What is Time willing to risk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Cronyism, once again rears it's Bushlike head!
so creepy and obvious, it ain't at all funny!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. Don't these nominees have to be approved by Congress
or the Senate, like all the other nominees (for instance, that dipshit Mike Brown at FEMA.)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. They do -- that's why they are nominated rather than appointed.
But since he is a Dem, the Dems may feel it's akward to torpedo him. I hope there are many more stories on that and he just withdraws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Hold on----------- didnt Reid suggest Harriet Miers?
who went down quick---

And now that Bush has taken Reids bait- if it is bait-- I have to ask--

Does Reid know something Bush doesnt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. What? You mean * or Rove doesn't know that this guy is
Edited on Sat Dec-17-05 05:49 PM by TheDebbieDee
Vivica Novak's hubby?

The couple has different last names like (Joe)Wilson and (Valerie)Plame, so he didn't immediately associate them?

I'm sorry, but I'm dense. What kind of something do you think Reid knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Reid looked like a genius with recommending Meirs
SO I have to ask-- whats Reid up to now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Oh, I get it. You think Reid is trying to cast suspicions
on Novak's testimony, if it should turn out to be favorable to Karl Rove?

Reid is going to imply that Novak's hubby's nomination was compensation for Vivica's testimony?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Two ways to read it. If Reid recommended him it could have been with or
without the knowledge of whose husband he was. The Bushies, on the other hand, had to do the background check, so they had to know. I am sure Reid gave more than one name. Or Reid could have been mischievous and they walked into a trap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. yes-- If Reid screws with Bush for a SECOND TIME
Edited on Sat Dec-17-05 06:16 PM by FogerRox
I will raise my opinion of him greatly. Of course if Reid does screw with Bush on this one-- I might expect Reid to do it every time-- LOL

I'm watching, to see what happens-- cheering harry -- all the way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. A few more links/bits of info here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. Just a new way to steal elections
Watch the Dem 529s be scrutinized while the Republican ones roam free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. Jesus on a trailer hitch
Nothing slows down his arrogance, does it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freedomfries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. ER cross-post from Dkos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
20.  Redstate.Org: An Open Letter to Viveca Novak
http://bink-from-daily-kos.redstate.org/story/2005/12/17/164236/40

Dear Viveca:

Well, it's been a while since we have spoken. I trust you are doing well? Mr. Luskin has been briefing me with the latest. Hold in there. It will turn out all right at the end.

...


I hope that you have not been too badly harrassed by Fitzgerald and his staff. I want to thank you for your loyalty. Every little bit counts.

That is why the president and I would like to appoint your husband, Robert D. Lenhard, to the Federal Elections Commission. We need a Democrat on the Commission, but we need a Democrat that we can trust. We've trusted you and we think we can trust him.

Do you have any thoughts on the matter?

Sincerely,

Karl Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. funny stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-17-05 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
22. Holy Fuck.
This is just so sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngGale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
24. Just DAMN....
damn, damn - :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
25. I call it the "smell test", if it smells rotten then it is........
this certainly stinks and I don't care if he is a DEM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
26. Imperial HUBRIS
Fearless Leader doesn't care what we think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
27. Well, now that is rather shameless..."ummm, my dog ate my notes", "I
never knew there was a month called March". No wonder Viveca sounded so incompetent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mugsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-18-05 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
28. OK, I'm an idiot. Someone please remind me who she is?
I've been struggling to keep up with the parade of paid-off journalists, "super-secret" sources and who knew what & when, but I've never quite heard Viveca Novak's story spelled out.

TTBMK, I was under the impression Viv "corroborated" Matt Cooper's claim that Rove leaked Plame's name to him, so this twist that her testimony is somehow part of Rove's "defense" is new to me, and Google News searches aren't proving helpful. :(

Can anyone please explain to me "who said what" and its impact? Feel free to go through the entire cast. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC