Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

08 Contenders: which have the GOP had the most time to define?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 11:10 PM
Original message
Poll question: 08 Contenders: which have the GOP had the most time to define?
Edited on Sun Dec-11-05 11:11 PM by usregimechange
They defined Kerry before he could do so and many think that played a role in Kerry's defeat. Although it is only one factor I think it is important to consider.

Which of the 08 contenders has the GOP had the most time to define and demonize?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why even make a poll like this
when the answer is obviously Hillary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I wanted to make a point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Which is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. That Hillary is already Satan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Let me be the first to say it (not really)
They will hammer Hilary like the Bride of SATAN and we will all be hearing about Watergate and Travelgate and Vince Foster and all of that crap all over again, all over the airwaves, all over everywhere.

And what will we come back with?

She is TOO well known, and she is WRONG on the war (though not as insanely wrong as Jomentum, of course).

One thing we can be sure of; there will still be US troops in Iraq in 2008. We will have to field a candidate that can do what Ike did. To me, that guy is Clark.

Right now Hilary is my Senator and I like what she does for NY but support her for the 2008 campaign? Not in a million bazillion years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-12-05 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Only if she's the last standing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC