|
Is that males (mostly white males, but not only), are so overwhelmingly Republican or Republican-leaning, that they will vote red unless the Repub candidate is a total dip-shit, and even then are more likely to stay home than to vote for the Democrat. Speaking about the aggregate, of course.
I remember a few years ago, there was a spurt of reporting in the media about white male rage, or backlash, or, well, a variety of words. But whatever you call it, and however fleeting it was addressed in the media, I believe it does exist. Fact is, white males held the upper hand for so long, to lose even a small part of it seems to many of them like they're the ones who are suddenly being oppressed. And not just the obvious sexist and/or racist types, but just the average Joe who doesn't really think about it much. He just knows something has changed and it ain't good for him, and his gut feel is that it ought to change back. Going back to "the good old days," however they are imagined to have been, is fundamentally what conservatism is all about. The specific issues, whether religious right looniness, or taxes, or military dominance in the world, etc ad nauseum, are pretty just the fall-out; at a deep psychological level, they just want to go back to when life was a John Wayne movie.
It's real hard for the Democratic party to reach these guys and still remain the least bit progressive. On the local level, maybe--a few DLC (and DLC-esque) congressmen can convince their white male constituents that they are different from the rest of those "damn libr'uls" in our party. In many states and districts, making that case is the ONLY way they can get elected, which is why I guess I make a certain allowance for the DLCers, even tho I don't agree with 'em on much and absolutely hate it when they try to divide the party. I live in Kansas, and it seems to me it's a lot easier to condemn the DLC when you live in safely blue state or district.
But I think there are also a relatively few Democrats who, by virtue of their background or demeanor or the way they frame issues or other factors (and probably a combination of all) who can reach a certain percentage of these guys without foresaking their progressive values. Especially the guys who don't pay much attention to specifics and just vote their gut. I think Wes Clark is one. I think Mark Warner may be, but I need to be more convinced of how deeply his progressive streak runs.
|