Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitzgerald Meets With New Grand Jury

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 03:57 PM
Original message
Fitzgerald Meets With New Grand Jury
NYT
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/08/politics/08leak.html?ex=1291698000&en=07c78f2d7745c79d&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss


Prosecutor in C.I.A. Leak Case Meets With New Grand Jury


By DAVID JOHNSTON
Published: December 8, 2005

WASHINGTON, Dec. 7 - The special prosecutor in the C.I.A. leak case returned on Wednesday to the federal courthouse for an initial session with a new grand jury in the criminal inquiry.

The prosecutor, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, declined to comment on the nearly three-hour session. It was not clear whether he presented any evidence to the panel.

<<snip>>

It was not publicly known why Mr. Fitzgerald met with the grand jury on Wednesday, but it is possible that he used the session to familiarize the grand jurors with the evidence.

<<snip>>

He has not, for example, concluded his inquiry into the activities of Karl Rove, the senior Bush adviser. Mr. Rove, who testified on four occasions to the previous grand jury, has been under scrutiny over his belated recollection of a July 2003 conversation with a reporter for Time magazine about leak-related matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Could Fitz be asking them for indictments at this time?
Is this likely?

Some have speculated that R*ve will be indicted before the end of the year.

Fitzmas during the holidays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He doesn't work in a hurry like that.
Patience will be rewarded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. i guess anything is possible n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shenmue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Duly keeping my fingers crossed
Oh, how I relish the thought of more indictments.

Go, Mr. Fitzgerald, go.

:loveya:

:patriot:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. "It was not clear whether he presented any evidence to the panel."
Edited on Thu Dec-08-05 05:03 PM by KansDem
Really? He spent three hours with them. What are we suppose to think?--"We're going to go around the room and I want each of you to tell us your name and a little about yourself!"

on edit: OK, so what does he do with the rest of the 2 hours and 45 minutes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Baseball analogies!
>OK, so what does he do with the rest of the 2 hours and 45 minutes?<

I'm kidding. :woohoo:

There were many briefcases full of evidence that made their way into that jury room. He didn't bring the stuff over there for no reason. Something's up. He also didn't visit those folks a scant two and a half weeks before Christmas for no reason. We'll see if the Luskin/Novak depositions are a missing puzzle piece.

Julie
president for life of the PFEB, and hoping that there is an extra special gift under the Fitzmas tree this year for the patient ;-)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-08-05 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. i doubt they...
dragged tose people into the courtroom for introductions. something's up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-09-05 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. LOL! That's funny.
I envisioned Fitz saying that to the grand jury. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC