Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

George Will spoke a powerful truth today.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
chieftain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:02 PM
Original message
George Will spoke a powerful truth today.
He described the Iraq adventure as imperialistic. i.e. the US is deploying military force in order to impose its will on a foriegn territory to secure various nationalistic interests. He went on to say that this raises the question whether a modern democracy equipped with pervasive uncontrolled sources of communication can function as an imperial power.
What we on DU know is that the answer to that fundamental question that Will poses is a resounding no. The recent poll that showed that an overwhelming majority of Americand reject the idea of deep US involvement in the internal affairs of other companies is confirming of our answer.
One of the minor reasons that spurred the RW war lords to invade a non threatening country was to snap our country out of what they viewed as a debilitating post- Vietnam syndrome.
The idiots have inadvertenly rekindled anti war sentiment and we need to punish the war party at the ballot box to make sure no administration ever tries this kind of immoral stupidity again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like George Will wants them to take away our internets.
Edited on Sun Nov-20-05 12:04 PM by Vickers
"raises the question whether a modern democracy equipped with pervasive uncontrolled sources of communication can function as an imperial power"

How many here would know about Wee Cowboy's fuckups if it wasn't for the internets? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soupkitchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I thought the question should be
"Why would a modern democracy want to function as an imperial power?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Didn't Have the Internet during the Vietnam Era...
and that didn't go so well for them either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazzleDazzle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. but the media wasn't quite as controlled as it is now so
it was about equall, all in all. Some of us remember seeing real video of real war broadcast during our nightly dinnners.

Having learned its lesson from that, the Pentagon won't even let us see caskets for this war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. That is True. We Still Had a Free Press Back Then
Now they own it all.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. george will is a paid prostitute
he sold his arse to the pig long ago...you're darn right....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. I think you have
called that one correctly. Because if not for the net these thugs would have controlled the "message" completely through their media outlets. And I do think that was the plan right from the beginning. Thanks should go to those that afforded the masses with this medium. It may have saved America from the PNAC'ers. Time will tell however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. He would rather that we be an imperial power
than that we be a democracy? I didn't see it, so I don't know the gist of what he was saying, but was he advocating ending our democracy so that we can freely persue imperialism?

With George Will, it wouldn't surprise me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Censorship will take care of the "uncontrolled sources of communication"
Controlling the MSM isn't enough if people can get their news from the internet.

George Will is nothing but a Fascist with a bow tie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keta11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wasn't he for the war when the going was good?
Sometimes I wonder how smart these clowns that are held in so high a regard really are. Most of us here on DU could see where this was going when the boy king started saying in 2002 that "Poland" was an imminent threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niallmac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think WE should be writing the opinion columns and
the George Wills of the world should just spend their days reading them.
We always seem to be about five years ahead of the big media curve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. IMO that's exactly what is happening now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marew Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. So true, so very true!
I was in my 20's during the Nixon fiasco and got into a major argument with my then father-in-law. I said very specifically that with all that was going on there was no doubt that Nixon would someday leave office in disgrace. They thought I was the one out of touch. Just like W...he was a major loser, is a major loser, and will always be a major loser. Where are peoples heads? You would have to be deaf and blind not to see through these corrupt self-serving jerks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. So, what do you predict for Shrub?
Will he leave office in disgrace, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marew Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. I can only hope!
Based on pure speculation on my part, I think we are stuck with this creep for 3 more years. (Oh, do I hope I am wrong on that!) I think what shrub has done and is involved in makes Nixon look like a two-bit criminal. But shrub and the family are much more powerful and with seriously powerful supporters and allies. Just look, shrub has always used family influence to get what he wants. He was barely an average student and got legacy admissions (which he openly admitted) to Yale and Harvard. If he earned 'real' degrees from either, I'm Cleopatra reincarnated. He is dumber than dirt. (When he was in South America recently, he looked at a map and commented, "Wow, Brazil is big!" You remember he asked Charlotte Church, who speaks with an unmistakable accent, what state Wales was in. And on, and on.) He is completely incapable of any form of introspective thought. Everything he touched, he destroyed but was always bailed out by daddy's friends. He was a drunk and drug user until he was 40 (probably is now too) and by age 55 he became president? Not without a tremendous amount of help. I believe because of name recognition and/or he may be truly mentally ill and easily suggestible or whatever, he was plucked by others to be a figurehead so to speak. I think that many years after we are gone, there may be a big revelation about what a lunatic he really was. I could very well be wrong, of course, but something is seriously not right with this picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chosen_one Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. there was nothing done
'inadvertently' or out of 'immoral stupidity'.

Everything the Bush Empire does is planned. The mass-murder and chaos are deliberate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. How true
Everything BushCo does is planned. What they didn't plan for was the outcome. They thought this would be easy - a small country, with a morally bankrupt leader would readily embrace those who brought about Saddam's fall. And Voila'! THe surrounding countries would get theri acts together and embrace democracy, too. Couldn't be simpler in the minds of these arrogant Neocons.

They missed the memo about how countries aren't too welcoming of those they believe are occupiers.

:hi: Welcome to DU

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Hi chosen_one!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LunaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. George Will must have discovered the PNAC agenda
See link in sig line for details
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
19. egad, that's frightening
Is he sending up the trial balloon?

In his syndicated column today, he denounces those who do not behave with civil manners. (A point well taken, but he could be communicating a desire for more UNIFORMITY, too.)

We're watchin' ya, George. Don't be donning that brown shirt, now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chieftain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I really don't think there was anything sinister
in his comments. He did not imply that the internet should be regulated, rather he put on the table the idea that a modern democracy cannot sustain imperialist ambitions. I agree with that proposition and would argue that war parties will never be able to sustain power unless they are willing to overthrow the Constitution.
He said nothing that would indicate that he would side with the Fascists. Indeed several of his recent pronouncements would seem to presage an abandonment of his support for this Neocon conned administration of soon to be cons.
Democrats have been presented with the ultimate wedge issue. We have a huge opportunity to drive a stake in the imperialist/ religious right because most Americans believe that we should mind our own business in international and personal affairs. To read Will lately is to see that even one of W's most sycophantic cheerleaders is beginning to be repelled by what he sees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Humor_In_Cuneiform Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
20. He's been kind of interesting to watch lately. He is conservative
and not happy with what * is doing to his party and beliefs.

Not long ago he said something about them disproving or ruining everything he believes in.

A conservative who is growing uneasy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. the Bushes dine at the Will home...
...and I wonder if that has changed? Will is the ultimate Washington society insider, part of the group that considers itself the "rock" of the establishment -- the group that believes that politicians will come and go but the Washington establishment will remain in charge. The Cosmos Club, Alfalfa Society group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Humor_In_Cuneiform Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Hard to imagine at this point, given what Will is thinking and given
*'s aversion to hearing "truth" unless it is HIS truth.

And just given how unhappy Will is about it all.

But that's my perspective. I couldn't, wouldn't ever want to be around * cause I could not be polite. And I wouldn't wanna deal with the whole thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chieftain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. I'm not carrying water for Will, but the ideas he has been
positing over the past few weeks are relevant to what the country is facing and consistent with what the anti- Iraq voices have been saying. To capitalize on his musing does not absolve him of his past misdeeds including but not limited to using a stolen Mondale briefing book to help Reagan in debate preparation. After all , even a blind pig finds an acorn every once in awhile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
24. KICK
:kick:

He must have found out about PNAC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. If he didn't already know about PNAC
he must have been in coma. I don't find that very plausible. If he's suddenly decided that he doesn't like the war, it's because it's gone sour and become unpopular, not because he's had any great new revelations. JMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
27. then it was an accident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chieftain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-05 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I grant you that . Nonetheless, the US and the world will be.
exponentially better off when our politicians realize that launching imperial adventures is the surest way to be consigned to the dustbin of history. The appeal of a staged aircraft carrier landing will have little attraction, when elected officials finally internalize that the great bulk of the American people will not tolerate long, drawn out military actions unless our existence as a country is threatened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC