Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Someone tell Michael Moore to stay out of this fight-please!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:33 PM
Original message
Someone tell Michael Moore to stay out of this fight-please!
The Repub administration is starting to throw his name out as guiding force of the Dem party. Anderson Cooper 360 just mentioned the Administration's comments pertaining to Moore and then read a statement -just received - from Moore where he claims that a majority of average citizens and Moore are all on the same page and against Bush and this war. Moore's presence now just gives the Rebups something to scare the public with and regain their support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. I disagree.. Most Americans agree with Michael Moore
and he has the right to defend himself. I trust he'll be smart about his response. He always is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. invoking michael and trying to demonize him shows just how afraid of him
all the little bushbots are. you are falling into the reichwing trap--turning on our own, telling them to shut up because they are upsetting the nutbars on the other side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
60. I agree...
the worst thing we can do is act embarassed, and that's how they want us to feel. He is a celebrated filmmaker you know. On the other hand, we should also be arguing issues not personalities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
80. No, alas.

It's not because they're afraid of him, it's because they think he's a useful idiot.

Michael Moore is a damn good investigative journalist, but he can't resist drawing conclusions stronger than the evidence supports, and as such I have very little respect for him, I'm afraid. Hyperbole and hysteria in politics are vices whichever side practices it, and are also very counterproductive, as the Republicans know.

By focussing attacks on Moore, they hope to convince the electorate that he's representative of the Democratic party and liberals in America in general. If they succeed, it will do a great deal of harm to the Democrat's election chances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. NOW, they have a solid target.
But still, if I were Michael Moore, I don't think I would stand by and allow my name be bandied about by this crowd without a rebuttal.

Guess it's foodfight time. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Agreed. Some of the vanguard need to take a step back now.
Michael Moore is one of them. He got the press talking and got branded in the process. He made a valuable contribution but the best thing he could do right now is to sit back and let others run with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenman3610 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Michael Moore will have to draw on his better angels
and lay low to work on his next movie.

It's waaay against his nature to do so, but
hopefully he's developed some savvy and
maturity by this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. Different voices are needed at different times.
(this is more for the benefit of those downstream...you seem to agree)


You need a siren to draw people's attention. Once you have it, a calmer voice is called for. Moore was a great siren and he deserves a lot of credit for that. I think he's generated too much polarity to be of much use in this next step, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Huh? Michael Moore doesn't exist to be "used" in a next "step"

whatever that means. The "polarity" is a lot of noise from the GOP - that's all it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. .
Edited on Thu Nov-17-05 10:39 PM by buddysmellgood
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Well, if it were to hasten an end to the war... why not?
Assuming that the premise is correct ( that it would help to hasten an end).

I'm not sure it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #15
85. That's the point. I'm not sure it would.
Moore (and others) got their attention. That was their purpose and they did it well.

Once the wood is cut, however, you don't use the saw to drive the nail just because it did a great job cutting the wood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #85
97. Agreed... emphatically. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broken_Hero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm not so sure...
F-9/11 was a very good movie, and I used it to plant seeds of doubt in my inlaws, who were very rooted in the RW party, this past election they voted for Kerry, and they were pissed at Bush, they felt duped big time after watching F-9/11. Most of the RW rhetoric will get old, after more people come forward to oppose this war. I think Moore will be fine, and the only people who will be afraid of him are RW hack jobs, who salivate at every word from Hannity, and Limbaugh....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why? Moore was right all along. People need to see F911 again. Some
will take a new look at it and realize the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. really , I'm still trying to figure out when did moore become hitler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yesterday there was a post calling for Cindy Sheehan to go away.
Now Michael Moore should shut up. Yeah, that's it, lets go back to appeasement and let the Republicans define the debate. Let's just tuck our tails between our legs and whimper off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
36. I know...shame.
THe repigs are retreating not us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
38. Cindy Sheehan is not part of this discussion. Moore is a
polarizing figure that many average americans find offensive. That is why the repubs have brought out his name and started throwing it around. I tell you, we are going to lose all credibility and lose this battle if Michael Moore takes the forefront. It's not a matter of whimpering off, its a matter of being smart and trying to win over minds. I tell you, Michael Moore won't allow us to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. Freepers don't like him because he's not afraid to say what he means.
What other things do "average Americans" find offensive about Moore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #38
57. That is my point.
The same arguement you make against Moore was made by another poster against Sheehan. This is why they are seen as "polarizing". This is exactly how people saw, and some still see, Howard Dean. As soon as the RW extremists demonize one of our leaders or spokespersons, should we abandon them? Should we ask Bushco to review who is an acceptable spokesperson for us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #57
66. Michael Moore, Cindy Sheehan, and especially Howard Dean are RIGHT.....
...and the DLC appeasement poodles are WRONG.

I dare say that "average Americans" can identify with a mother of a dead soldier, an average guy from Flint who used his talent to call attention to corporate abuse, and a country doctor who turned down a Wall Street career, far more than they can identify with professional LIARS, COWARDS, AND TRAITORS like Al From and Will PNAC Marshall.

I know who I'll trust. Every time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #8
65. Those chickenhawk bullies will go after ANYBODY who crosses them.
If it weren't M.M., they'd find somebody else. They need a bogeyman to scare Joe Dumbass 'Murkin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marbuc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why do we continually let them get away with this?
Every time they bring up Michael Moore, we should remind them about Bill O'Reilly's recent comments and Pat Robertson's call to assasinate Chavez. Every time they bring up Moveon, we should remind them of Focus on the Family and other powerful fundie groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
40. Exactly! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 03:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
69. Exactly! Whose assassination has Moore called for lately?
Nobody that I know of, lately, or... ever.

Contrast that with the behavior of repuke icons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. I disagree - Michael Moore is courageous & brilliant

They try to paint him as a "kook" because he's so fucking right-on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaggy1974 Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Moore may be many things, but...
i'm not sure "brilliant" is one of them. (I do however respect him)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Yeah? Well, as a filmmaker, he is brilliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. I was against the war before it started. I was vocal. Should I shut up now
too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
41. No, unless you have the same reputation as Moore. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. And what reputation is that? As a truthteller? As a great filmmaker?
What's your problem with Michael Moore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #41
79. A reputation for being right? For speaking freely?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #41
90. So anyone the repubs stigmatize, we should shun...
sounds like a solid plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Punkingal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. I think he should talk loudly about it...
These idiots in the WH are getting more petty and juvenile on a daily basis. I can't believe they brought him up. Let him talk, so more people will realize we have a dangerous adolescent in the oval office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaggy1974 Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. How will Moore....
talking loudly about it, convince people that there's a "dangerous adolescent in the oval office"? I just don't follow the logic there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Punkingal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
32. I just think it is beneath the POTUS, or it should be...
to get in a pissing match like this. The more people see this sort of thing the more ridiculous the WH looks. But that is only my opinion. I'm not suggesting any Bushbots would see the light, but perhaps some fence-sitters would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaggy1974 Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. Vietnam and anti-war
This is an interesting point. During Vietnam, the majority of the people were against the war, but a significant number of them were also against the anti-war movement, which made it that much easier for Nixon, et al to do the kinds of desperate things that Bush, et al. are doing now. I think it might be better to let this run its course without people like Moore. (Not that Moore probably has much control over this anyway)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Yeah, it came back to haunt Kerry 30 years later.
If he would have shut up back then he might be President now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Huh?
So coming out against the war was wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #26
37. Seems to be the general point of the post above mine.
But maybe it's just wrong for Moore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #37
54. Ah, gotcha n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #16
46. You are right, I am thinking about how Nixon was able to look
like the strong and sensible candidate next to all the over the top protesters and rhetoric. McGovern was made to look to volatile to extreme, thus he lost every state but one and Nixon became President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. McClellan used Moore's name....
he had a right to respond - and I thought that his answer was a good one.

:patriot:

emdee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #18
47. As long as he lets it go on without him now. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
19. Why the fuck should Michael Moore run away? Because he was RIGHT?? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #19
48. No, because he could possible lose us some support with the
average American. He is viewed as a radical- fair or not. I want to keep people on our side not lose them because of concerns about Moore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #48
74. I know a number of "ordinary" people who were affected by F9-11.
Moore is a boogeyman for the hardcore Republican base, but I don't believe that he is widely reviled. I've talked to people of all ages and walks of life who had their eyes opened by F9-11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seansky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
20. there is a breaking news every hour seems like so this will be placed
in the back burner very quickly...don't sweat it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
24. Why do you fall for their propaganda. I appreciate all he does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #24
49. Its not me, its the average person who sees thing our way
right now, they could possibly go running back to the Bush administration if they feel threatened. And Moore comes off as a radical. I want to keep the momentum on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #49
83. If they are that stupid, then let them
The bottom line is this war is a disaster, kids are dying left and right, and the economy is tanking. If these 'average people' want to run back to Bush, simply because of Michael Moore, they can go right ahead. People that stupid are probably too stupid to remember to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
28. Moore has the freedom to do as he does, just like any one of us.
We need to say that because Moore is an anti war activist. He went after Clinton in Bowling for Columbine as he went after Bush. He is an independant thinker and does speak for Democratic party as an elected official or as an advisor. His views only anger to GOP faithful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetladybug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Michael Moore should speak out. He was right about Bush and Bush's
illegal war. EVERYONE SHOULD WATCH FAHRENHEIT 9/11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 04:07 AM
Response to Reply #28
71. He does have that right. However,
whether or not it would be expedient for him to use this right, at this time and in regards to this issue, is another thing entirely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #28
87. On edit, He "does not" speak for the democratic party as an elected
official or a paid advisor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
discopants Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
29. Miichael Moore is on prime time is a bad thing?
Speaking on the war.... ya think maybe some people who would automatically tune him out are now tuning him in? Maybe a wider audience will discover that the GOP boogeyman actually is talking sense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkmaestro019 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
31. that's called an ad homimen argument
and someone ought to change that to the Michael Moore argument--if Moore says it, it's automatically bullshit.

However, mysteriously, no one has managed to sue him for his constant lying. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
33. the fact that Scottie compared Murtha to MM shows how scared he is
they are scared of losing a chunk of their base now. That is such a desperate strategy. It's really quite a testament to MM.

1)First they ignore you
2)Then they laugh at you
3)Then they attack you
4)Then you win

Isn't that how it goes? Isn't that how it's went for MM? Looks like the people who have been trying to bring this terrible war to an end are almost to step four.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Badger1 Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
34. More Moore's
What we need is more Moores to tell the truth and be candid. I for one are VERY proud to have him on our side. We need guts and balls and MM has them both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
35. Oh please, you
worry too much. The Americans are on the same page with Michael Moore..they finally caught up with the Dude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
39. So we should help them silence Moore?
In the politics of "personal destruction" it is only one's friends who come to your side. Michael Moore, even if you don't like him--I do, has done nothing wrong. In fact, he was correct about this war.

You will never see the right-wing abandoning Rush or Hannity; they run to their defense. That is why they win.

No, Michael Moore is someone they fear even as they vilify him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #39
50. What new does Moore have to add now. He is 2004. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #50
63. What does Moore add?
How would I know, I just defend his right to "free speech."

How do we know what anyone has to add?

Again, Rush has adding nothing to society since his life began, but the right-wing would become ballistic if anyone attacked their guy?

pssst: Actually, Moore is doing a film about Katrina. Good. And I hear he is also doing a film about "big pharma." Ditto good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
43. Only repuke loons fear the name of.... MOORE!
He's a rethug boogieman, now. No one else cares.

More Moore, I say!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #43
51. Sorry, I disagree with your estimations of who view Moore in a
negative way. That is why they have brought him back out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #51
55. I honestly disagree
Moore isn't the lightening rod that, say, Hillary Clinton used to be. I think they want him to be, but I just don't see it. He's a filmmaker and that's how most people view him, whether they agree with him or not. I just don't see this getting any traction for them other than with their own hardcore.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #55
62. Well, I hope you are right! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #62
68. Why not look at it this way:
For every person Moore's reputation may dissuade from our cause, O'Reilly will dissuade two or three persons from THEIR cause. We'll still end up with more supporters.:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #51
75. They are notoriously bad at understanding things.
They think Moore will scare people more than he really will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #51
92. Right, because they lie about him, smear him, and stigamatize him
and then political 'pragmatists' decide its easier just to let them have thier way with Moore and distance ourselves from him, this ensures that the right will be able to continue to build up thier Moore Boogeyman to be used over and over again to marganilize the left and every Democrat who aqueisces to the right's frame lends credibility to that boogeyman.

Confronting peoples misimpressions of Moore and confronting thier misimpressions of the war, Bush, and everything else are all the same battle. It is all part of one large propaganda system. We wont win until people stop buying into right wing lies and that includes right wing lies about Michael Moore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
45. This is great!!
The majority of American voters have at least a bit of a clue. Some of them were seduced by tales of Clenus and Saddam's fictional involvement in 9-11, but even they can tell when the Repugs have completely lost it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
52. I think you have a valid concern
Michael Moore is at his best when he's doing his own thing and when he's doing it on his own...via books or documentaries. When he jumps into the political spotlight, I don't know, things can backfire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #52
53. Thank you!! That is exactly my point!! I personally like Moore. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Check12 Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
56. Michael's response says it all..
34%

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #56
58. lol
That about sums it up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #56
61. Yes, and I like to keep it at that or even get it lower.
Moore, won't have this effect, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazzleDazzle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
59. On the contrary
this is a perfect time to start to rehabilitate him and liberalism. So much of the public is so freakin' anti-Bush right now that they are going to be far more receptive to even Michael Moore. His statement tonight was great, by the way. He pointed out that most Americans agreed with him, and that he and we ARE the mainstream, and Bush is the extremist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
64. No,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
67. Don't worry. I used to hate Moore
back when I was deluded enough to actually do really stupid things like vote for republicans.

Now I think Moore is an American hero.

Any repuke--oops, I mean, republican--voters who are worth our having will eventually have to inwardly admit that Moore is right about a LOT of things, and that Moore (alleged "Halliburton stock" notwithstanding) is a friend of the People.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
70. We'll know they've jumped the shark when they whip out ...
... Willie Horton and Jane Fonda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
d_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
72. So because Moore gave a response,
Edited on Fri Nov-18-05 06:19 AM by d_b
the American people are going to run back to Bush? Is this going to be Bush's new boogeyman for the next month? Everytime Bush gives a speech he's going to invoke Moore's name and link him with Democrats?

I want what you're smoking.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
73. Who do you propose should step up and be a voice for our side?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
76. bushco is pretending like they need help achieving 29% approval. no matter
WHAT happens, they'll get there.

Godspeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough already Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
77. Michael is a major reason why we have reached this point
He needs to be shouting now, not hiding. There is no need to be afraid of these right wing pricks any longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
78. Michael Moore's "radicalism" is a Right Wing Talking Point.
He scares the Republicans far more than he scares the "public."

If you're truly so concerned, why don't you send him an e-mail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oc2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #78
82. If they want to talk 'radicalism' maybe they should look in the mirror.

the righties are full of 'radicals' who are make Moore look tame by comparison...Ann Coulter, O'rielly, Limbaugh....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oc2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
81. Is Moore a Radical or a Patriot?

Moore was right, he took a stand against the war when the Dem Presedential candidates where bowing to the Republican puppet masters.

Moore was out in front leading, as he knew best, with a cammera and film.

Moore is not a radical, he was RIGHT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oc2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
84. Indications of Bush administration is in its final death throes?

They are on the ground flopping around look at anyone to lash out against.

Someone needs to shoot it in the head and put it out of its missery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
86. what for?!? he has been proven to be 100% correct it all that he has said!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
88. Fuck that
I'm not even reading this ridiculous thread. Who the hell is ANYBODY, Republican or Democrat, to tell Michael Moore when he should speak or not speak. Grow the fuck up and recognize that censorship is WRONG. Grow some guts while you're at it.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
second edition Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #88
89. I don't think it wasn't meant as a command- just a suggestion.
For the possible good of the effort. No censorship was intended IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
91. Watch Fahrenheit 9/11 again...
I rewatched it last night and it really is a solid piece of work. I even recognized Harriet Myers in a shot.

Repugs will always diss Moore for movies they never saw. They can't reasonably dispute his claims in Fahrenheit 9/11...yeah, he's fat...yeah, he's a slob...yeah, he hates America...

I say keep Moore in the news...maybe more people will watch his movies...

Think the idea that if Martin Luther King was still alive, Repugs would be dissing him as well. Not that Moore is anywhere near MLK, but they would use his name for talking points too.

Let them rot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
93. Hell, why should he
stay out of this fight. I would say to everyone. Go back and look again at the movie, F-9-11 and see all the truths in there. It will speak volumns about what his happening now to this administration.... I say speak loud brother, but speak, and that is to all.... Hell, if you going to be a bear, then be a damn grizzley...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
94. Did you read Moore's statement? It is short, sweet and right on!
I was watching Anderson Cooper's show last night when he announced this:

And, just moments ago, Michael Moore released this statement exclusively to CNN. He said: "Unfortunately, the president doesn't understand that it is mainstream Middle America who has turned against him and his immoral war and that is I and the Democrats who represent the mainstream. It is Mr. Bush who is the extremist."


http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0511/17/acd.01.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strathos Donating Member (713 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
95. I agree with Michael Moore and trust him more than the politicians
His voice should be raised and his name should be mentioned.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-18-05 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
96. The Republicans gripe and moan and talk
about everything. If not Michael Moore, then someone else, if not Cindy Sheehan, then someone else, get the picture?

There is nothing this party can do that the Repubs won't make a public dispute over. So we should go ahead with and let them squawk. The public gets tired of these character shots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC