Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Iraq...remains a colossal, blood-drenched fraud"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:29 PM
Original message
"Iraq...remains a colossal, blood-drenched fraud"
The Nation
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20051121/schell

Letter From Ground Zero | posted November 2, 2005 (November 21, 2005 issue)

Faith and Fraud

Jonathan Schell

A factitious picture of the world built up by the Bush Administration over its five years in power is now going to pieces before our eyes. Great jagged spikes of reality, like the crags of the iceberg that ripped open the staterooms of the Titanic, are tearing into it on all sides. The disrespected world of facts, an exacting master, is putting down this governmental insurrection against its ineluctable laws.

The pivot is of course the war in Iraq, which in its origins and conduct was and remains a colossal, blood-drenched fraud. But now a majority of the public has caught on and wants the United States to withdraw. In addition, a special counsel has reached directly into the White House and, for the first time since 1875, indicted an official who works there: the Vice President's chief of staff, Lewis Libby, who was trying to suppress the truth about the war by punishing a truth-teller, Ambassador Joseph Wilson.

But of course, the Administration's rebellion against the factual world has gone far beyond the war. The government has been mobilized across the board to erase or deride knowledge of everything from the largest problems now requiring the world's attention--such as global warming and the spread of weapons of mass destruction and their materials (while the Administration ransacked Iraq in vain for them)--to the comparative minutiae of domestic policy, such as the cost of prescription drugs, the extent of power-plant pollution and malfeasance in the award of Pentagon contracts.

As the fantasy explodes, new aspects of the machinery of falsehood are being brought into view. The willful, concerted, energetic tenacity of the defense of fiction is notable. The twenty-two pages of Libby's indictment portray the office of Vice President Cheney skillfully and relentlessly deploying all its resources to protect the single false allegation that Iraq was purchasing uranium in Niger before the war. Cheney and his team worked for weeks to marshal the information and misinformation with which to smear Wilson. Meetings were held to discuss just how to spread the dirt to reporters. A misleading identification ("former Hill staffer") for the designated smearer, Libby, was concocted.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. I haven't read this yet, but did just subscribe to The Nation.
My 78 yr. old dad has been a subscriber for years!
And why do you have an article from Nov. 21st?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. it's just the way...
Edited on Fri Nov-04-05 12:18 AM by dajoki
the magazine dates articles for release on the web and in the mag. posted Nov 2 for Nov. 21 issue. i have been a longtime subscriber, you'll enjoy it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. OK. For a wonderful mag, geared towards libs and progressives,
WHY the hell is the type so tiny? I go blind trying to read it! Older people subscribe. How about giving them a break?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. now that you...
mentioned it you are correct. maybe we can complain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 04:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Bush Regime Iraq Successes
Edited on Fri Nov-04-05 04:04 AM by Disturbed
Bush Regime Iraq Successes

1. Saddam will no longer sell Iraqi oil via the Euro.

2, A military foothold in the ME. Other than Saudi Arabia.

3, No countries will be able to buy Iraqi oil that the U.S. disapproves of.

4. The Multi-Intl. Oil Corps are reaping great profits.

5. The Military Industrial Complex is a booming Industry.


"The terrorists want to control the oil. Our way of life will be at risk". George W. Bush

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. over 2000 dead americans...
not to mention the innocent iraqis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. Oh please! Facts: psssh
Why, you can use "facts" to prove anything that's even remotely true. Just believe hard enough, and you'll see. You'll see.

Just now on MSRNC, Chip Reid was reporting how all those Democrats who control the House and the Senate voted to invade Iraq just like the Republicans based on the same information that the White House had.

Waitasecond. Kool-Aid wearing off. Hey! The House and Senate aren't controlled by the Democrats. And they didn't see anything in terms of evidence of intelligence that hadn't been thoroughly filtered by the White House first. Why, I'd almost think that Mr. Reid was just parroting talking points without thinking or was counting on his viewers to be so stupid as to ignore all of those facts that I led off this paragraph with.

I wonder which it is: Is Reid stupid, or does he think his viewers are stupid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Both n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC