Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

All right Now I know I'm crazy. I'm agreeing with Wm Buckley.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 09:33 AM
Original message
All right Now I know I'm crazy. I'm agreeing with Wm Buckley.
I found this at www.crooksandliars.com

This is a quote from William F. Buckley
"But even if she was safe in Washington when the identity of her employer was given out, it does not mean that her outing was without consequence..... In the swirl of the Libby affair, one loses sight of the real offense, and it becomes almost inapprehensible what it is that Cheney/Libby/Rove got themselves into. But the sacredness of the law against betraying a clandestine soldier of the republic cannot be slighted.

Wm. F. Buckley gets it right and the so-called leftwing press misses the importance of the story. I really have been in Korea too long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Correction: Buckley agrees with you
You haven't changed your opinion of this corrupt administration and its traitorous antics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Very clever
Edited on Thu Nov-03-05 09:42 AM by rpannier
I never thought of it that way. Buckley agrees with me. I like that better.

Just out of curiosity, how long do u think it will take scrubbie to start accusing Buckley of secretly being a bush hating liberal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Intelligent people can't deny what's happening
They may delude themselves for a while, but eventually their arguments grow thin and old.

Ever notice that the truly rabid wingnuts are using more and more byzantine arguments to support the administration? Sometimes two stories cancel each other out.

Take the Plame case. There are two main defenses for the outing of Plame.

One says "It's not a crime, she wasn't covert, it wasn't done by our guys"

Another says, "Joseph Wilson got what he deserved, he's a liar, a cheat and he's under the thumb of his wife"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Humor_In_Cuneiform Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. That is the difference between your garden variety neocon and
a true traditional conservative.

I'll almost never agree with a neocon.

A traditional conservative can be intellectually honest with themselves and the world.

Therefore I can find myself in agreement with them at times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prescole Donating Member (416 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. Manhy conservatives are gentlemen/women with the best interest
of the nation at heart.

Unfortunately, they don't sell as much shampoo and cereal as the mean-spirited, self-aggrandizing, narrow-minded, insulting, partisan, divisive ASSHOLES like Hannity, Limbaugh, and O'Reilly.

One day I think the right wing pundits who follow the script written by Rush will be seen in the same light as Joseph McCarthy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagine My Surprise Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. I've always respected Buckley...
as all of you are noting, HIS era was a far different color of GOP than today's conservative imposters. It's all so Alice in Wonderland, everything is backwards kind of thing.

Especially when realizing that many of today's so-called Neo-Con was a "liberal" in the 60's and 70's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC