Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dana Milbank, Apologist for White House Lies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 10:04 AM
Original message
Dana Milbank, Apologist for White House Lies


Dana Milbank


Dana Milbank is a man who works for the Washington Post as both a reporter and a columnist.

He appeared on MSNBC's "Countdown with Keith Olbermann" yesterday.

From Media Matters for America, about the White House press conference yesterday after Bush's scripted conversation with the troops in Iraq:


Discussing the event on the October 13 edition of MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann, Washington Post reporter Dana Milbank commented on White House press secretary Scott McClellan's handling of questions about the event:

MILBANK: Scott McClellan, who is a good and decent guy, has to get up there and say, This is not a rehearsed event, even when they've actually released the footage showing that it is a rehearsed event. So when he has to say up is down, and he has to go taking on challenging the motives of the press corps, he's obviously got a problem. I don't know how he could handle this any better, unfortunately.


Milbank calls McClellan a "good and decent guy" -- then, in the very same sentence, says that McClellan lied to Milbank's colleagues and the American people. Then he goes on to indicate that McClellan handled it as well as he could have.


When did reporters start taking the position that lying to the American people constitutes handling things as well as possible?

Wouldn't telling the truth be a better way to "handle this"? Why is Milbank defending McClellan's "challenging the motives of the press corps" -- Milbank's colleagues -- when he knows McClellan was lying?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. The wind isn't blowing hard enough for Milbank to discern its direction.
As for Scotty-Mouth being "good and decent," Milbank considers himself to be good and decent. I suppose it's where you set the bar that matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yet Milbank gave an obvious laughing smirk at the "2%" Black approval
of Shrub. Milbank's all-out chuckle and smirk as he speculated on "Countdown" that the "+ or - 3% margin of error" COULD mean that Shrub might have a minus 1 approval rating. And 'those negative approval ratings WERE somthing to worry about.'

I saw in Milbank's body language, AND language regarding that poll...a real obvious, 'not afraid anymore' to show how he truly felt at last.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. The White House went after Milbank with a vengeance
back when Ari was press secretary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Interesting. I suppose they finally tamed the little masochist, then.
I did see his condescending interview on Countdown. From what little I observe of him on Internet video clips and reading his articles, it seems to me that Milbank is a windsock journalist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Excellent assessment of Dana Millbank
These pseudo journalists ignored all the evidence of the lies told by this administration, and they were serious lies, for years now. I remember Millbank making fun of Rep. Conyers' hearings on the DSM.

Why anyone asks him for his opinion on anything is beyond me. He is definitely working for the WH.

He tried to dismiss the Jeff Gannon story (when we finally know who told him about the memo, that story too will prove to have been important, imo), make fun of the lies revealed in the DSM and ridicule one of the few decent politicians we have in this country today.

Since he rarely actually 'reports' on anything, as far as I can tell, but mostly gives his opinion, we have a pretty clear picture of his own moral compass.

1) Phony journalists are no problem
2) Lies are fine, even if they are about war
3) An honest politician, shut out by a criminal administration, is someone to ridicule, while crooks in the WH are not.

There's more, but Dana is a joke, like all the rest of the WH propagandists, except for the fact that they got so many people killed.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susu369 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Catrina, you have given an excellent assessment
of Dana. I agree with you totally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. His slamming and ridiculing Conyers was too much for me.
I never trusted a word he wrote after that. And, he was on Matthews show last night participating in Chris's "We all lie in Washington and it's nothing to go after Wilson because it's hard ball." (I'm paraphrasing what he said last night but it was all about how things run in DC and we should expect politics to be down and dirty and people's reputations to be ruined because it's part of the game.)

IOW's to Matthews it's no big deal that a CIA Agent was outed because in his mind he thinks she was "fair game" if her husband tried to defy a President. :eyes:

Milbank strikes me as the same. He thinks it's all crooked so who cares how low it can go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stumblnrose Donating Member (405 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. I know where to set the bar for Scottie
1600 block of 17th NW.Not that there's anything wrong with that but the hypocrisy of these anti-gay gays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's a rhetorical device- before you slam someone
you start off with a positive to show you are balanced and then you attack.

I think Milbank is more on our side than not from what I have seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Is saying a person had no choice but to lie
really a slam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. I read it as sarcastic and RealPolitik you know
paraphrasing:

McBalloon-head is a good and decent man (sarcasm) with a compromising job, he works for a corrupt admin. who has been caught in many lies and he is caught lying in their defense- poor fatheadScotty, he is in a tough posiiton what could he do- he has a pact with the devil.

Dana has been in the front lines in the WH press conference shouting qustions at lyingfathead- his statement here in print is subtle- he is a journalist and can't come out and say scottyisaRW ho' like we can.

My concern is that if Dana is in our corner- and we miss read his subtle attacks and attack it was- then we may alienate ourselves from a useful ally--if we count that is. LOL

I mean, this was pretty strong comming from a journalist who sits in the WH press meetings front row.

"So when he has to say up is down, and he has to go taking on challenging the motives of the press corps, he's obviously got a problem"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carolinalady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. "The truth shall set you free." From employment that is.
I think that was Dana's way of saying that McClellan has no choice in what he says. He is the BFEE mouthpiece. Personally I think he or anyone that would agree to spout * partyline is slimy. I would not be surprised if he is not actively seeking alternative employment at this time. It seems like he is tired of being humiliated.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yes, that is a reasonable interpretation.
While Scott McLellan could have said, "Yes, it was scripted" it may have been his last day as White House spokesman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. Milbank Did ONE Good Interview Of Late!
ONE... basically he ain't the guy who will "hurt" the WH!

I've seen him too many times to think his spots are going to change!

Where's David Gregory lately????

Of course, we do still have Olbermann! Loved how he kept saying "his producers" were making him cover certain subjects last night!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
12. Dana Milbank, Skull & Bones
Bonesmen pledge loyalty to the secret society that is a loyalty above all others.

It's pretty clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-05 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
15. Dana Milibank has been a reliable WH tool in the past, ENRON
lie which he told back in winter 2002 was that no on in the administration ever lobbied for the House bill that would have given an immediate retroactive tax rebate of taxes never paid by Enron to Enron. This bill was introduced in the wake of 9-11, was rushed through the GOP House. I have link at Salon in the Enron thread in Politics which show an administration official (i forget which one now) giving a speech in October in which he specifically mentions this bill and supports it. Actually, I have a quote from the link. The link has mysteriously disappeared (ha!). Democratic Senate killed the bill. Days later Enron went bankrupt, possibly because it didnt get that cash infusion.

Anyway, the press was breathing down the WH's neck about Enron, the Senate was still in Democrats hands and holding Enron hearings and Dana Milibank, bless his soul, writes an article in which he states that the Administration NEVER EVER lobbied for that House Bill that would have given money to Enron.


He has done other shit, too, but the Enron one was an out and out lie, proving that he is either so sloppy that he writes what the WH tells him to write without checking it or so subservient he writes what the WH tells him to write without checking it.

Now that the WH has gone down the toilet and is heading out to sea, Milibank is enjoying his freedom and is getting back at them.

I wish that Countdown would stop putting him in soft focus. It makes him look like an aging movie star.

I dont know why he like Scottie Dont so much. Maybe they like to cruise malls together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC