Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Still puzzled: Why did the administration allow Fitzgerald to be chosen?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:04 PM
Original message
Still puzzled: Why did the administration allow Fitzgerald to be chosen?
Why would the Rove-Bush** administration allow Comey (asst AG now departed- to a job with an aircraft company I believe) to install Fitzgerald, a tough prosecutor with a good reputation of calling them like he sees them, etc. ? Unless there was deal up front, this is damned hard to believe. Fitzgerald has not been leaking (a good sign?); he seems to be taking a hell of a long of time (a bad sign that he is covering it?- or a good sign that he is being thorough and will indict the bastards?). Is he so good that he could bend the grand jury to Bush**-Rove's benefit? Still troubles me why they would put such a respected, tough person in there. Hoping they could buy him out or twist him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gademocrat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe they thought if Comey chose Fitz it was all o.k.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Comey is a republican, so that sounds possible. They trusted him. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. at the time they chose Fitzgerald.......
.....it was a long time ago, at least 2 yrs ago. I believe, at that time, Bush believed the people who were close to him (like Rove) were innocent.

I think they put Fitzgerald in charge because they wanted the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. Does this mean you think Bush and Cheney are not involved?
Do you really think that Rove and Libby especially, would do this on their own?

I have no doubt Bush and Cheney are involved, the question is can it be proved. That part will be hard since they can't rat on Bush, since they will need him for a pardon when the indictments come down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madame defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ashcroft...
I think I heard that Ashcroft was the one who picked him because Fitzgerald was a Republican. Looks like Ashcroft didn't do his homework very well. Fitz is doing a helluva good job at nailing George Ryan, former Republican governor of Illinois on the license for bribe scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. No, Ashcroft recused himself, Acting Attorney General James Comey
who then empowered Fitzgerald unilateral authority to "expand" his jurisdiction and "pursue it wherever he wants to pursue it".

We owe a great deal to Comey and his forsight.

You can find more info here at FindLaw:

http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/doj/comey123003doj-pconf.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ashcroft got in trouble for staying involved too long so he had
Edited on Thu Oct-13-05 05:25 PM by McCamy Taylor
to hurry and hand the job over to his second in his command a career person in the DOJ and REALLY TRULY let him pick who was gonna do the investigating. If Ashcroft had not tried to interfere and run a cover up at the start, he probably could have gotten away with selecting some old fart sympathetic to the GOP who would have run a low key investigation.This is the trouble a lot of people are in now. Gonzales tried to cover up at the start, too. Now he cant do shit to control Fitzgerald, cause Fitz can say "Hmm, you have a personal interest in this matter, dont you?" Just about everyone in the administration and every high ranking GOPer in DC was involved in covering it up.

http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0538,waas,67952,2.html

"We now know that then attorney general John Ashcroft insisted on being briefed on Department interviews of Mr. Rove that were conducted in connection with the leak. He did so despite his own long-standing ties to Mr. Rove; Mr. Ashcroft had paid Mr. Rove almost $750,000 for work on several campaigns. That Mr. Ashcroft eventually recused himself demonstrates there were conflicts of interest with his continued involvement."

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0107-14.htm

Why Did Attorney General Ashcroft Remove Himself From The Valerie Plame Wilson Leak Investigation?
by John W. Dean
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. that second in command is just
as tough as fitz,,,makes ya kinda wonder if the career people in the doj were just waiting for someone to nail these guys
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. I wonder what Bush's criminal defense attorney thinks of Fitzgerald?
I ask only because after seeing a refernce on another thread I have decided to use the phrase "Bush's criminal defense attorney" as often as possible. Later today I am going to my favorite wine shop and I intend to ask the clerk whether it is true that "Bush's criminal defense attorney" is an oenophile. I am going to try and use the phrase "Bush's criminal defense attorney" everywhere I go and in every conversation I have.

One relevant comment I can make regarding your post is that you should keep in mind that much of the delay in Fitzgerald's case has been the result of Cooper and Miller appealing their contempt citations all the way to the Supreme Court, which refused to hear it. If Cooper and Miller had testified when first ordered to by the District Court, Fitzgerald may have finished his investigation months ago and we would be enjoying the trial phase of this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. That's true. Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbeach Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. CS
http://citizenspook.blogspot.com/2005/08/citizen-spook-was-spooked.html

go to left and click on USAGand bush have no legal authority to fire Fitzgerald

read the article of 8/8/05 and gives good factoids

that particular article is clogged but navigatable

CS is a mixed bag on DU but I have learned much from his interpretations..
PS CS says it don't look good for the villains
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KC21304 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is from August, but it is a good background
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Very good. Thanks, helps me a lot. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. I think they wanted this to die quietly--at least for the time being.
Appointing a prosecuter who was an obvious partisan hack would have opened the administration to accusations of a cover up. Picking an honest prosecuter put the case on the back burner until well after the election.

They believed that by the time Fitzgerald was done presenting his case, the Iraq war would have been long over, a resounding success with minimal casualties and that no one would care less about going after the administration for getting us into it.

They were wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enraged_Ape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. Did you ever see the classic Costa-Gavras' political film "Z"?
It was about the assassination of a political figure in Greece and the resulting cover-up/shenanigans. The people in power appoint a guy to "investigate" the murder who they consider to be somewhat innocuous and a friend to them. Only he is so appalled and horrified by what they've done, he actually begins to do his job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Great flick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. The GOP will blame Ashcroft but its Bush's fault for getting a politician
when they should have gotten a lawyer to be AG. A lawyer wouldn't have dicked around when he had a suspicion that Karl Rove might be the guilty party meaning that he might be called upon at some stage in the investigation to recuse himself. A lawyer would have distanced himself immediately. Only a politician tries to get away with as much as he thinks the public will let him get away with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KnaveRupe Donating Member (700 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. The most plausible scenario is that Comey isn't crooked.
Ashcroft, yeah. He's evil. But when Ashcroft found out in December of 2003 that this was going to be a huge shitstorm, he was smart enough to get as far away from it as possible.

Comey had been a Federal Prosecutor before becoming Deputy AG, and was close friends with Fitz. If Comey is crooked, there's no way he appoints Fitz. If Comey's clean, he gets the best guy for the job he can find, which is what it appears happened.

I would assume that Ashcroft and Comey both caught hell for not making this go away; it would certainly explain why both are gone from the administration now. But once Comey named Fitz, it was out of the Admin's hands. there was literally nothing they could do.

Here's an article by John Dean from 1/04 that has some good info:

http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20040106.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I have always had a feeling that Comey had been pressuring Ashcroft
to recuse himself for some time before he eventually did. Just a hunch, nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. OK. Hmmm. Thanks. n/t
Edited on Thu Oct-13-05 06:03 PM by AlinPA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Comey indicted Martha Stewart and got a reward with the job in DC.
So he was trusted. Makes sense they would trust his appointment of Fitzgerald. But Fitzgerald was known as tough. No wonder that Comey left town!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
15. Because they messed up. . .they have done it before, right?
Surely you can think of several times where this admin screwed up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
22. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. oh boy, more flocco crapola
If it was raining outside, this guy would insist (a) its sunny and (b) the rain is being held captive in a closet somewhere.

He's ridiculous.

onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
24. because contrary to what some people think, they aren't allpowerful
puppetmasters. In fact, far from it. They're incompetent boobs who think they're all powerful. Its called hubris.

onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC