Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was underfunding of New Orleans payback for Landrieu's '02 Senate victory?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:21 AM
Original message
Was underfunding of New Orleans payback for Landrieu's '02 Senate victory?
Two hallmarks of this administration is the lockout of Democrats and their vindictiveness. They were really hoping to gain the LA Senate seat in '02, and they put a lot of effort into that race to unseat Mary Landrieu. It wouldn't surprise me if they intentionally avoided funding for works in New Orleans for their own petty reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
erpowers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Would not Suprise Me
It would not surprise me if they did in fact underfund efforts to repair the levee to get back at Landrieu and Louisiana. However, I think the Bush Adminstration has been underfunding the project since they came into office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wabbajack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not exactly IMO
I think it's that they didn't have a puke senator to beg * that the funds not get cut. He listens to them see John Thune and that air force base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. But they do have a Republican Senator as well as a Democratic one.
It is just that the Republican is in hiding out of embarrassment of his party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
littleraf Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yes It Is Definitely Payback
Please forgive the length of this message, but I'm from louisiana and I VERY much want to amplify danslos' point because it is at the very core of what happened -or rather didn't happen- after Katrina.
Bush is furious with New Orleans and has been for years. Orleans has certainly given him a lot of reasons for spite. New Orleans is the seat of Democrat support in Lousisiana. Without New Orleans black voters Louisiana's governor, Congressional seats and both Seante seats would have been Republican LONG ago. Even in a state that goes Republican in presidential elections the city of Orleans gives the Dems the edge in statewide elections. Senator Mary Landrieu had lost most of her black support by the Fall 2002 midterms. She was trailing her GOP opponent, former New Orleans city councilwoman, Susie Terrell in the polls -Terrell by the way had been given her walking papers out of the council by the black voters of New Orleans. In her first term Landrieu had lost support by not visiting her home state and not doing a thing to improve the condition of the black voters who elected her. All the prominent black politicians had abandoned her: congressman Cleo Fields, William Jefferson, State senator Greg Tarver -in fact Fields and Tarver attacker her publicly. Her poll numbers were falling near-daily. By November 2002 the GOP thought they would easily add a Republican seat from Lousisiana, a "slam dunk," you could say. But Landrieu immediately began to repair her allegiances with the black community.
Remember, the 2002 mid-terms were the first elections after 9-11, and everyone was saying it would be a barometer to measure Bush's post 9-11 political clout. The GOP won seats nationwide, but Louisiana's Senate race went into a run-off. The whole nations' eyes were on this state. Bush bragged so much following the initial mid-term victories, but now people were saying it was a fluke, the result of Dems intimidated from campaigning full-bore against the GOP by the prospect of Bush questioning their patriotism. However, if Bush could pull off a statewide win again, so soon after his mid-term victories, then it would prove beyond any doubt that the mid-terms weren't the result of weak and vaccillating Democrat campaigns, but rather of his own undeniable popularity. Mary Landrieu based her entire campaign on Bush-bashing, blaming him for Louisiana losing it's sugar industry, and steel, calling Terrell a "rubber-stamp." She was the only Democrat with the guts to campaing and talk like a real Democrat. Bush HAD to defeat her, no matter what. He pulled out all the stops. Bush came down here(to my hometown of Shreveport in north louisiana), his father went to New Orleans, as did Trent Lott and Dick(head) Cheney. But just like with Iraq the GOP overestimated their prestige in Louisiana. The GOP's invasion turned off white voters who didn't like all these outsiders telling them how to vote, plus it mobilized the black vote statewide and while Landrieu's six years of ignoring her black voters still left a bad taste in our mouths about her, we knew the consequences of not supporting her. Of course Landrieu won, and then (to add insult to injury) the next morning Landrieu went on all the Sunday morning talk shows thanking the black community for their support. This rubbed salt in the wounds of Republicans nationwide! To think of it, a white feamle from the South thanking blacks for her job. It proved to the whole country who blacks supported and it proved why. I'll never forget how on all 4 major Sunday talk shows she said, "We won and the black vote led the way." It was nice to see her acknowledge that it was the black vote that saved her job. She was clearly in fence-mending mode.
Bush was furious but his humiliation at the hands of New Orleans voters wasn't over. Bobby Jindal, a former Bush administration official with HHS, ran for governor and again it was Orleans parish's black voters who handed him a sound beating at the polls. The GOP was red-faced with fury and all Louisiana's right-wing talk shows became free-fire zones for racial slurs and insults. I actually enjoyed listening to them confirm their racism and unabashedly broadcast to the world how "dumb" they thought blacks supposedly were, because I knew we had finally done something that reached the bastards. David Vitter won John Breaux's old Senate seat last year by running on the traditional platform of vowing to ensure white privilege, but his "victory" was only by one measly percentage point. And even Vitter admitted that if the Democrat vote hadn't been split by a 2-way race between Chris Johns and John Kennedy he would have lost. Bush painted Vitter as a rock-ribbed Republican rooted in principle, unwilling to bend to the demands of the undeserving negro. But the power of Orleans (even in defeat) was to put the lie to this boast too. The day after the election Vitter broke his chief campaign promise and went to the New Orleans voters. Suddenly he was willing to be "flexible" on affirmative action, city and state jobs and contracts for blacks, funding for poor inner-city schools and all the other things important to blacks that he said he'd get rid of. After the election he did the math and no matter how he worked the numbers he realized the number and rate of growth of black residents (and hence voters) in Louisiana is far outgrowing the white populace. He may have eked out a slim win with white support in 2004 but this was the LAST time that would EVER happen. Blacks are currently 35-percent of the state's population. In 20 years blacks will be at or near 50-percent. In the South, where Red states reign, Orleans parish has been the biggest thorn in Bush's side for years. A perpetual reminder of the GOP's impotence before a mobilized black electorate.
It is against this backdrop of being continually humliliated and his ambitions thwarted by the black voters of Orleans parish that this disaster happened. It also explains why Bush reacted so slowly, and why he and Mike Brown are playing such sick games with aid delivery. To Bush this wasn't a natural disaster, it was a opportunity for some payback against the people of New Orlenas for having denied him the power he craved. Don't think it's lost on him that were it not for Orleans he would have had both Louisiana Senate seats by now instead of only one (bringing him that much closer to the critical 60-percent Seante supermajority he wants so badly), and he would have had one more governorship, filled by one his former lackeys, no less. When you see him smiling on TV as he stands before a landscape of destruction, that's a gleeful smile you're seeing on his putrid face. I'll bet he even believes God sent this storm to punish Orleans for not obeying HIS "chosen" representative. Nothing that's happned after Katrina has been accidental, especially not the non-response. His actions before and after the storm are completely consistent with his famous vindictiveness. Recall how he treated John McCain, Richard Clark, Joe Wilson & Valerie Plame, John Kerry -the list goes on and on. Now tell me that what he's done to New Orleans doesn't fit the pattern of Bush getting some payback! This whole affair is nothing less than Bush at his vindictive worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shadoobie Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Damn. Great post!
Thank you for the perspective. I had no idea what was going on locally at the time. Nominated.

Greg

P.S. Welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. We all know the BCE is a vindictive bunch, but why would they bother......
...with "revenge" against a "Democrat" who votes their agenda 9 out of 10 times?

Since these fascist clowns like to do everything in secret whenever possible, it actually serves their purposes better to have DLC senators in place, voting for their agenda and making it impossible for Democrats to ever have an accurate prediction of how many votes they'll end up with on any given issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC