Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A reminder of what's at stake in 2004

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bain_sidhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:05 PM
Original message
A reminder of what's at stake in 2004
It's a long article, but well worth the read:


America as a One-Party State
Today's hard right seeks total dominion. It's packing the courts and rigging the rules. The target is not the Democrats but democracy itself.

...But if President Bush is re-elected, we will be close to a tipping point of fundamental change in the political system itself. The United States could become a nation in which the dominant party rules for a prolonged period, marginalizes a token opposition and is extremely difficult to dislodge because democracy itself is rigged. This would be unprecedented in U.S. history.

In past single-party eras, the majority party earned its preeminence with broad popular support. Today the electorate remains closely divided, and actually prefers more Democratic policy positions than Republican ones. Yet the drift toward an engineered one-party Republican state has aroused little press scrutiny or widespread popular protest.

We are at risk of becoming an autocracy in three key respects. First, Republican parliamentary gimmickry has emasculated legislative opposition in the House of Representatives (the Senate has other problems). House Majority Leader Tom DeLay of Texas has both intimidated moderate Republicans and reduced the minority party to window dressing, rather like the token opposition parties in Mexico during the six-decade dominance of the PRI.

Second, electoral rules have been rigged to make it increasingly difficult for the incumbent party to be ejected by the voters, absent a Depression- scale disaster, Watergate-class scandal or Teddy Roosevelt-style ruling party split. After two decades of bipartisan collusion in the creation of safe House seats, there are now perhaps just 25 truly contestable House seats in any given election year (and that's before the recent Republican super gerrymandering).

...<snip>

Third, the federal courts, which have slowed some executive-branch efforts to destroy liberties, will be a complete rubber stamp if the right wins one more presidential election.

Taken together, these several forces could well enable the Republicans to become the permanent party of autocratic government for at least a generation. Am I exaggerating? Take a close look at the particulars.


More: http://www.prospect.org/print/V15/2/kuttner-r.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bain_sidhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nobody cares about one party rule?
Just checkin'

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. we've been complaining about one party rule for 40 years
this is hardly new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
worldgonekrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. News flash: we've already got that
I just don't believe it. Everywhere I go I see people who vote Democrat wringing their hands and asking themselves "why don't the Dems do anything?" Why didn't they:

- Vote against the Patriot Act?

- Protest when much of the Patriot Act II was secretly pushed through Congress?

- Vote against the clearly disastrous and morally reprehensible IWR?

- Demand a *real* investigation into 9/11, rather than a bullshit whitewash job that we are so obviously going to be subjected to?

And so on.

Well I've got the answer for you. You might not like it, you might think I'm crazy, but just consider it: the Establishment Democrats are largely complicit with the neo-con agenda, ESPECIALLY when it comes to the police state and foreign policy.

This is why getting a Democratic president in is not enough. It will be like applying a band-aid to a severed limb. Instead, we need a complete repudiation of politics as usual. I think that is best embodied by Howard Dean, though John Edwards and Wesley Clark have potential for this as well, IMO (though I just don't trust Clark).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't like it, but I don't think you're crazy
But I think it is best embodied by Kucinich. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bain_sidhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. News flash... no we don't, but we're close
We are at the tipping point. If the pukes are allowed to finish packing courts, the only thing that will remove them from power is bloodshed. Imagine *every* court in the land ruling like the supreme court did - if they don't like the results of an election - whether for President or dog catcher - they'll simply change it by judicial fiat. This article makes clear that if we lose the Presidency this year, the pukes will be able to institutionalize their hold on power to the point where no opposition is allowed, and indeed, will be punished severely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC