Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conyers / Raw Story: More problems at Justice (Abramahoff investigation)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 10:37 PM
Original message
Conyers / Raw Story: More problems at Justice (Abramahoff investigation)
Edited on Tue Aug-23-05 10:47 PM by paineinthearse
http://www.conyersblog.us/

Blogged by JC on 08.23.05 @ 09:16 PM ET

Tuesday, August 23rd, 2005

More Problems at Justice Department

It is no secret that the current Justice Department may well be the most politicized in memory, if not history. Ashcroft's mishandling of the Rove investigation, where he was receiving private briefings concerning alleged misconduct by his political friend and ally and former consultant for many months before he was forced to recuse himself is a case in point.

Recently I learned of very questionable actions by the Department in replacing the Acting U.S. Attorney in charge of the Abramahoff investigation in Guam. He was dropped, possibly because he was too agressive in pursuing the case, and the replacement has apparently not pursued the matter. Because of these concerns, today, I along with Madeleine Bordallo, the Delegate of Guam requested the Inspector General to investigate. Raw Story has our letter.

http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Guam_envoy_to_Congress_calls_for_Abramoff_investiga_0823.html

Guam envoy to Congress calls for Abramoff investigation
John Byrne

The ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, joined by Guam's Democratic representative to the United States House of Representatives issued a call to the Justice Department to investigate the demotion of a prosecutor who was investigating Bush fundraiser and megalobbyist Jack Abramoff, RAW STORY has learned.

<snip>

A recent report in the Los Angeles Times suggested Black was demoted because he was investigating Abramoff, whose lobbying tied him to major Republicans in Congress as well as President Bush. Such an investigation could have been a major liability for Bush, and might have brought to light a web of other scandals that are now being investigated by the Senate, the FBI, and the Justice Department.

Black was an aggressive prosecutor, ferreting out corruption in the Guam government. He was replaced with a prosecutor with a lighter hand, possibly at the behest of Bush adviser Karl Rove.

The letter was copied to House Judiciary Chairman F. James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) and Assistant U.S. Attorney General William E. Moschella. It follows.


#
August 23, 2005

Honorable Glenn A. Fine
Inspector General


United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 4322
Washington, DC 20530-0001

Dear Inspector General Fine:

We write to request that the Office of the Inspector General conduct an investigation into the November 2002 demotion of former Acting United States Attorney for Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands, Frederick A. Black. We are troubled by an August 7, 2005, report in the Los Angeles Times that suggests this demotion was politically motivated (enclosed).1

At the time U.S. Attorney Black was demoted, he was supervising a grand jury investigation into the lobbying activities of Jack Abramoff and conducting an ongoing investigation into possible corruption within the Government of Guam. U.S. Attorney Black had been serving as the Acting United States Attorney for more than 10 years when he was demoted. The timing of President Bush's decision to remove and replace U.S. Attorney Black is questionable and warrants an investigation.

The Los Angeles Times reports that in 2002, lobbyist Jack Abramoff entered into a secret agreement with Guam Superior Court officials to lobby against a court revision bill then pending in the United States Congress. For his lobbying efforts, Mr. Abramoff was reportedly paid with thirty-six $9,000 checks funneled through a Laguna Beach lawyer to disguise the lobbyist's role in working for the Guam Superior Court. These transactions were the target of a federal grand jury subpoena issued on November 18, 2002, which required the Guam Superior Court Administrative Director to release records involving the lobbying contract. It was on November 19, 2002, that President Bush announced he was demoting U.S. Attorney Black. The federal grand jury took no further action in the Abramoff investigation.

The Los Angeles Times also reports that at the time U.S. Attorney Black was demoted, he was directing a long-term investigation into allegations of public corruption in the Government of Guam. This inquiry produced numerous indictments, including some of the top officials in the government. The Los Angeles Times reports that an extensive effort by lobbyists connected to the Government of Guam is responsible for U.S. Attorney Black's demotion. In May 2003, U.S. Attorney Black was replaced by Leonardo Rapadas who had been recommended by the Republican Party of Guam. Fred Radewagen, a lobbyist, said he carried that recommendation to Karl Rove, White House Deputy Chief of Staff, in early 2003. Since taking office, U.S. Attorney Rapadas has excused himself from the ongoing public corruption case involving the Government of Guam because he is the cousin of one of the key targets of the investigation.

Again, we are troubled by the circumstances that surround the demotion of former Acting U.S. Attorney Black and request than an investigation be conducted. The Department of Justice should be concerned that a federal prosecutor was possibly removed from his position as a result of lobbying efforts by those he was investigating for public corruption. We appreciate your prompt consideration of this matter. Please reply through the Judiciary Committee Democratic office, 2142 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 (tel:202-225-6504; fax: 202-225-4423).

Sincerely,

John Conyers, Jr.
Member of Congress

Madeleine Z. Bordallo
Member of Congress

cc: Hon. William E. Moschella
Assistant Attorney General

Hon. F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr.
Chairman, U.S. House Comm. on the Judiciary



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Politicized=corrupt
So many crooks, so little time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. speaking of recusals
this is way off topic but today on AAR they said that John Roberts was part of a three judge panel hearing a case that involved bush-cheney (maybe it had to do with military tribunals trying Guantanamo prisoners?) while bush was simultaneously talking to him about a position on the Supreme Court ...

i believe that should qualify as criminal conduct by bush and by Roberts ...

what will these poor prosecutors do all day when there are just no republicans left to indict ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marbuc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. There will always be Republicans to indict
and Democrats also, unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. How to reach the House Judiciary Committee (Dem) staff
If you should happen to have information useful to their investigations.

http://www.house.gov/judiciary_democrats/contact.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. thanks, Paine ...
haven't done my homework on this yet ... just heard a little clip on the radio ...

seems like kind a powerful argument against Roberts though ... there's nothing worse than a judge who allows his independence to be compromised ... whether the discussions from bush-cheney affected his decision or not, and btw he ruled in their favor, a judge needs to avoid not just conflicts of interest but the appearance of conflicts of interest ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is their fantasy for "the man." Conyers, is our Trojan Warrior
But Fitzgerald won't go at all. If they consult Mr. Hugh Bris and and get some bad advice, they'll try to fire him. Imagine what that would do to the magnificent 36% approval rating. My goodness, it could drop into the 20's making history yet again.

The * administration has one place to go and that's down and out.

This is a great gem. It's subtle yet revealing of their intentions.

Conyers is "shining the bright light" on this to let them know that he "knows."

The man works like a Trojan. And remember that Thursday marks the date the Trojans defeated a force 20 + times their size at Battle of Thermopylae. (September is the anniversary of the Battle of Marathon wherein the Athenians saved democracy from the Persians. What will Rep. Conyers have for us that day).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. I hadn't realized that the prosecutor was demoted
Conyers is on top of it once again. Where are the other Dems?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Conyers is the best
Nothing gets past him. Imagine if all our Representatives worked as hard as he does for the people?

I read about this a few days ago ~ I think it's great that Conyers is putting a spotlight on it in case they try to get rid of Fitzgerald. This would show a pattern, and bring this story to light also ~

He is amazing, Conyers I mean! I really am amazed at his energy and focus ~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
10. Conyers rocks! And what about Abramoff's Mariana Islands slavery stuff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. If you should happen to have information useful to HJC's investigations...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I only know what I read in DU n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. I think the article I read
was from Wayne Madsen ~ PITA. I'm never sure what to make of his writings since I have seen that some people are skeptical of him sometimes.

But I have complete faith in Conyers and although I did not doubt WM's article that someone in Guam was protecting a friend of Tom Delay's, it's good to have it confirmed.

Sorry, I don't have a link to the Madsen article at the moment ~ I'll try to find one, shouldn't be too difficult.

It's so amazing that Conyers gets so little cooperation in Congress for these very important issues ~ I hope with the Fitzgerald investigation going on, that this story will now get some attention.

nominated, btw because I think it is very important that we support the only member of Congress who supports us!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
13. .
11-hour :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. Another post in support..nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
16. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithnotgreed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
18. if not for mr conyers
would we have any representation in our government
at all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. Kick for Conyers!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
20. Letter has been posted to House Judiciary website
http://www.house.gov/judiciary_democrats/letters/dojigblackdemoteltr82305.pdf

August 23, 2005 Text of Letter from Reps. Conyers and Bordallo to DOJ IG Fine Concerning the Demotion of Federal Prosecutor Investigating Jack Abramoff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
21. Thank you, pita, and Rep. Conyers.
I read this on Raw and Conyers blog this morning. I recall reading the news article earlier in LAT.

Conyers is ON IT! And we must HELP him stay on it!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. (and another nomination for others to see this important story)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
23. Boy Raw Story. You're becoming John Conyers personal newspaper.
Edited on Wed Aug-24-05 03:31 PM by Joanne98
Way to go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
24. When Is ANYONE Going To Get These CROOKS????
This stuff just goes on and on and on! Let's have some ACTION!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. When John Conyers becomes chair of the House Judiciary Committee
It is IMPERITIVE we take back at least one house of Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
25. KICK!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC