Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Low Will Smirky's Poll Numbers Have To Go Before They Produce Osama?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:20 PM
Original message
How Low Will Smirky's Poll Numbers Have To Go Before They Produce Osama?
Something is fishy about not being able to capture Osama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ironman202 Donating Member (608 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. what good is he in capture?
Much more useful as a free stalking horse...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. I doubt they'll get much lower
There's a certain percentage of Americans who will support him regardless of what's happening. The Republican base. These numbers are probably close to the lowest they will go.

However, I will gladly welcome being proven incorrect. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lildreamer316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Now there's a very good question.
It will be interesting if they will actually go this far. Hmmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. If they had Osama we would instantly know it.
They are morons, they don't want to catch him. He is their meal ticket for endless war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I think they do keep trying
Now and then there is yet another operation in Pakistan and Afganistan, esp. when things here get dire. The last spike in American deaths in Afganistan was when he was "addressing the nation" about Iraq and they desperately wanted to produce Osama for the occasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. They would've by now if they could. Don't you doubt it :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Osama's been dead for a long time according to some sources
The Guardian (UK) reports that some of the tapes released were fake with 95% probability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. woof.... They promised the BinLaden family years ago that
he will retire in comfort, unmolested...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. One reason why they may not want to ever catch Osama is
if they do, it would show to the world that all we needed to do to punish those who were responsible for 9/11 was to make it a police action rather than go to war against some nation. The question is, if we could capture the ring leader of the attack, why did we need to go to war with two nations who didn't cause the attack? Shouldn't we have, way back then, gone after the perpetrators rather than a nation?

Osama is not the leader of Afghanistan nor is he the leader of Iraq. Once we have captured him we would have captured the leader behind 9/11 making all the other actions seem grossly unnecessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Mr. Mountainman, you are totally on point
They cannot afford to capture him. All that funding for their anti-constitutional stuff would disappear. All the patriot act crap would be gone. How else can these neocons maintain control?
It is their only card - which can be trump so long as it remains unplayed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Also, Osama is the bogeyman. He scares us and Bush protects us.
Edited on Fri Aug-12-05 08:31 PM by Mountainman
We captured Saddam and now if we capture Osama, who will be the bogeyman? Who do we need protection from? Al Queda would be a headless snake. A leaderless bunch of misfits.

Conservatives have always needed a bogeyman to get people to vote for them. We Dems and liberals are the bogeyman too. Communist Russia was the bogeyman until they gave up and tore down the Berlin wall. Dems and liberals took the communists place. Freepers even call us communists sort of a longing for the good old days of the cold war I think. They need a hate object. Something in the dark that is out there to get them if they don't stand up and fight. Something to give their miserable lives meaning how ever unreal that something might be.

Osama is a good bogeyman for cowboy George to protect is from with his six guns ablazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. they would create another.
THey would have to. That is how these creeps operate, anyway.
For all we know, the creature they create would not even exist.
they would feed other countries' Intel units with "snippets" of intel and data, showing them just what they need to see to be scared and cooperative and thankful for our sharing. And then, some unnamed DOD source would leak info to the MSM and discuss this NEW ENEMA, so fearful, so powerful and so smart, that we have to tighten all freedoms up until this person is caught.

bah. I trust them not one inch of the way. These people are evil liars and powerhungry assholes.

pardon my strong language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. He's dead. He died of kidney disease in December 2001
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. They will never produce Osama alive. He knows too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC