Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Green for Dean?? No..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wanderingbear Donating Member (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 08:38 PM
Original message
Green for Dean?? No..
I guess my party party voted no on that plan(news to me)..So there will be no Compromise and the democrats have no hope of winning against Bush this election..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
wanderingbear Donating Member (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Why would I do that??
It says that this is a fourm for all liberals..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
30. Yes, but you know we are mostly Democrats.
What is your whole point of this thread, other than to aggravate us?

You say you've got a real solution, well, you know, we'd all love to see the plan.
- The Beatles, "Revolution"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wanderingbear Donating Member (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. Weve shown you the plan.You rejected the plan.
Were going ahead with the plan anyways.. Ill have to be sure to mention this site to my Green Party friends.. That is unless you guys deside that the Greens are Baned from this site to.. Ive never seen so much censorship on a Webform. And the Democrats claim to be pro free speech..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-03 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #36
43. The plan is four more years of Bush?
Edited on Tue Dec-23-03 12:11 AM by LoZoccolo
I mean, that's what you said in the original post in this thread.

But when you talk about destruction, don't you know that you can count me out?
- The Beatles, "Revolution"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-03 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
42. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. When the fascists come to arrest us all...
..I'll slug the nearest Green first...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
worldgonekrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I'll slug you back
Funny...you are afraid of fascists, yet you don't think the Green political viewpoint has a right to be heard. Who is the fascist here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Did I say anything to the effect?
Edited on Mon Dec-22-03 09:05 PM by wyldwolf
The Green viewpoint can and should be heard.

But, if the original poster's scenario comes to pass (and that is what this thread is about, right?), the Green viewpoint will have been heard even as Bush enjoys his second term.

No one honestly thinks the greens will win. If they siphon votes, we all lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iverson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. violence is a poor and cowardly reaction
Your threat also engages the notion of collective guilt. Try to imagine your deciding to slug the nearest Democrat upon the sellout of the Congressional Black Caucus, and you can see how irresponsible your statement is.

Have a bipartisan day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
morgan2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. dean is no compromise
he's more of a centrist than al gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
twilight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Green Party has already endorsed Kucinich!
and I heard they MIGHT endorse Dean IF Kucinich doesn't win the nomination.

In the meantime, GO DK!!!



:dem: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
morgan2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. no ralph nader encouraged people
to vote for kucinich in the democratic primaries and said he wouldnt run if kucinich was the nominee. He is not the green party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
twilight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. your are right morgan2
Mike Malloy stated this on his program this past Friday. Listen up - he's a Kucinich supporter and discussed the Dean aspect.

Actually, Mike Malloy will be on in a few minutes:

http://www.mikemalloy.com ... :D

:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
32. Sounds like he won't run if Dean is the candidate also.
Certainly Kucinich is closer than Dean to the Greens, but looks like Nader is being a realist here.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=277608#277926
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wanderingbear Donating Member (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. No..They have said they will run their own canidate..
And not choose from among the Democrats..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. link please?
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wanderingbear Donating Member (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. National Green Party website
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. thanks....
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
40. More than one nation-wide Green Party
There are a number of Green Parties nationwide. The site linked above is for the National Green Party. Here's a link to the Green Party USA's site: http://www.greenparty.org, which is based out of Chicago.

"The Green Party" is not a monolithic entity, like the Repubs or the Democrats, as there's more than one Green Party in the US. Also, different state branches affiliate with different national parties, as do counties and cities.

We had a similar situation in MN a few elections back, when the pro-pot party split into two different (but very similar) warring factions. It reminded me of that scene from "Life of Brian" where the various Jewish liberation groups were ranking on each other. Funny, if it wasn't so trajic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosophy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. If so their shooting themselves in the foot
If the green party supporters are smart they are going to realize that so much is at stake in the next election that they will to vote Democratic instead of Green even if their party runs someone. Then when the Green candidate does much poorer than expected it will be a blow to their party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wanderingbear Donating Member (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. No..Their shooting the Democrats in the foot..
Edited on Mon Dec-22-03 09:03 PM by wanderingbear
The Greens have never won a presidential election,so they dont put all their hope on that.But we have enough numbers to topple any chances the Democrats might have of winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Lots of Laughs
Edited on Mon Dec-22-03 09:08 PM by BeatleBoot
You stated, "the Greens never won a presidential election..."

Ding, ding, ding!!!!

You are correct!

And they never will!

Enjoy Bush! You deserve him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. News flash -
this is DemocraticUnderground - all liberals are welcome, yes, but I seriously doubt if "liberals" who want to topple the Democrats and give Bush free reign are going to be taken seriously. Green - yea, sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wanderingbear Donating Member (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
35. The Idea of the Democrats haveing an underground is rediculus..
Their too mainstream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iverson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. You are overstating your case.
In 2000 the Democratic candidate won, and only is not in the White House through a combination of timidity and electoral fraud. Gore did that without Green votes.

Further, I have found your approach to be a mirror of those exact things that are objectionable in the way that most Dems approach Greens. Belligerence and threat are no way to persuade. Dems alienate Greens when they do that; there is no reason to believe that your tactic will bear different results traveling in the opposite direction.

The outrageous thing is that in most cases Democrats and Greens expect to be allies at some point. Granted, a few revel in enmity, but try to remember that you're not arguing with the fascists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iverson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. and one other detail
If you really are a Green, you know that the convention will reflect the collective decision of the state delegations, and not all state Green parties have exactly the same positions, nor do all candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wanderingbear Donating Member (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Its no longer my tactic..
I was willing to make a compromise.. But the Party vote was against the compromise..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iverson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. no
I think that you are confused on that issue. At this point the only sentiments that we have to go on are resolutions proposed by individual states and positions of individual candidates. I recommend that you look into David Cobb. Surely you must know who he is.

Mainly, though, I was referring to the ways that we talk to each other. If I have to explain that further, it will do no good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wanderingbear Donating Member (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #24
28.  THe National Party has just organized
Edited on Mon Dec-22-03 09:34 PM by wanderingbear
Me and my sources were unaware of this..Im still registared with the old Green party. THis is just the News Im getting in from other members of the party from the Email list..Things are really up in the air right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
20. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
wanderingbear Donating Member (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Inter Party e-mails.
Sorry all on e-mail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. huh?
Inter-party emails between which parties? Greens and Dems? Whom within the parties? On what authority do you have such information? I'm not disputing that in the end you might be correct, but unless you can produce the goods I think it's a bit early to start whipping the natives into a frenzy. Care to provide us with some of the actual text (and context) from those "inter-party emails?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wanderingbear Donating Member (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. No. between the Card carrying members of the Green Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
wanderingbear Donating Member (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Pay your a Party member dues
And they will send you one..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. I'm sure of it
he's been wrong about most everything up to this point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iverson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. You know, Ter, ...
Once again the term "subtrefuge" comes to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. He's got no proof...
Edited on Mon Dec-22-03 09:33 PM by BeatleBoot
By the way if there were emails between party members, then they would be INTRA-Party emails - not INTER-Party emails


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wanderingbear Donating Member (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #27
31.  What Youve never heard of insider information..
But it does seem that our e-mail list is outdated..We just found out that theres a national party,and weve been working to make up for that lack of information.. But thats what we got so far..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wanderingbear Donating Member (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. Besides what do you expect?? The Greens have gone National..
They have to run their own canidate now or loose their National Party status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
38. Uh, the "Greens" really should send a more articulate representative here.
no offense...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-03 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
41. So wanderingbear, what Green Party are you speaking for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-03 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #41
44. Maybe it's the "hold your breath until you turn green" party.
Edited on Tue Dec-23-03 12:17 AM by LoZoccolo
:nopity:

I went down to the demonstration, to get my fair share of abuse,
Singin' "were gonna vent our frustration, and if we don't we're gonna blow a fifty-amp fuse."

- The Rolling Stones, "You Can't Always Get What You Want"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-03 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. Yesterday he started off saying he was national green
then changed to being part of the pacific green party...
Both times he claimes that the HQs were in Salem, Oregon.

The HQ for than national greens is DC. For the pacific greens it's Eugene...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC