Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Right turns on Blair for being 'soft on terror'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 02:02 PM
Original message
US Right turns on Blair for being 'soft on terror'
US Right turns on Blair for being 'soft on terror'
By Alec Russell in Washington
(Filed: 25/07/2005)

The American Right, for four years a fount of rapturous praise for Tony Blair, is showing signs of falling out of love with Britain over what it sees as its soft and ineffective record on terrorism.



The July 7 bombings prompted outpourings of sympathy from Americans. But the media coverage of the bombings was marked by a tone of frustration at London's record of tolerance for Islamist preachers. This has intensified on the Right in the wake of Thursday's botched attacks.

Two prominent articles in the latest edition of The Weekly Standard, the neo-conservative journal with close ties to the Bush administration, have laid into Britain's domestic approach to fighting terrorism.

Under the headline "Letter from Londonistan" Irwin Stelzer concludes that British policy amounts to "easy entry for potential terrorists" and "relative safety from deportation and detention as enemy combatants".

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/07/25/nus25.xml&sSheet=/news/2005/07/25/ixnewstop.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Puzzler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe...
The Weekly Standard would like the British police to shoot a few more people?

-P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benbow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Repugs want the Brits to shoot a few more South Americans, it would appear
No, wait, "execute" is the (inappropriate) preferred verb here, isn't it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. I guess Bush feels that the killing of innocent suspects is good...
...anti-terrorist policy. By accelerating these types of killings, eventually they'll hit a real terrorist and it will be worth in. In Iraq, Bush doesn't even bother to count who the U.S. has killed, they just keep up the pace, knowing that some time in the future they'll get most of the terrorists. If they manage to exterminate all of the remaining Iraqis (22.3 million), well anyone who is left who are not U.S. or coalition related, are terrorists so by this process of narrowing down the targets, Bush knows he'll eventually get them all.

All Bush wants to see is that Tony Blair follows this same train of thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Utter hypocrasy.

The country with some of the most porous borders and docks in the world says what?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. bu$hCo is pissed because poodle-boy didn't try to whip the Brits into a
frenzy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MN ChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Ding Ding Ding
Blair conducted himself with a reasonable amount of dignity and didn't openly try to whip up the mob mentality. Unlike ChimpCo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC