Which Website is more Ideological?

[Tandalayo_Scheisskopf]

1. http://www.hcdems.com/

2. http://www.warrenctydems.com

This is not a stunt. This will be used to generate useful data. Thanks.

[Walt Starr]

1. #2 is the less ideological

and is also a pretty amateurish site.

Lousy layout, horrible coding. Looks like a blind chimp coded that page.

[Tandalayo_Scheisskopf]

2. Thanks, Walt.

I administer that site. I appreciate the critique. Now, got any of your own web work I can see? ;-)

On edit: I get paid $0.00. I am a volunteer.

[GreenPartyVoter]

3. Still looks more pro than my sites

:shrug:

[Walt Starr]

5. Well, then the amateur part was absolutely correct!

Sorry, I calls 'em as I sees 'em.

;)

Mayhaps nmy problem was using IE. Perhaps I should view with firefox?

[Tandalayo_Scheisskopf]

6. Hell, use two dixie cups and a piece of string!

I don't care! ;-)

[newswolf56]

4. Couldn't get #2 to download properly: the main story...

apparently about a new county chair, was too jumbled to read. But the other stories all read as if they were produced by a mediocre public relations firm on a rainy Thursday. However #1 was lively, fun and invited me to spend a lot more time (if I had it to spend) just exploring: it looks as if it's put together by a good rowdy bunch of folks who are not only ideologically right on but would be a lot of fun to drink beer with too.

[Tandalayo_Scheisskopf]

7. Fair enough.

That is a very interesting response.

See: Editorial controls. I can say no more.

[infinitehangover]

8. Sorta agree

I think No. 1 would be more fun to drink beer with, something I consider vital, however I have a feeling around 2 in the morning the talk would become a Jim Hightower rant, which pretty much bore me.

[Tandalayo_Scheisskopf]

9. Well...

*I* can be a lot more idealogical. But I am just the web weenie. I have to dance to the tune of others.