Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I've been thinking about treasongate and how it all went down...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FormerRepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 10:09 PM
Original message
I've been thinking about treasongate and how it all went down...
How about this.

BushCo want to invade Iraq to finish Gulf War I.

Bush, Cheney, a bunch of other NeoCons and Ahmad Chalabi are in cahoots to fix the intelligence on Iraq. Ahmad Chalabi is associated with the Iraqi National Congress, which is funded by the US. BushCo is also very familiar with Chalabi. (This exposes more BushCo lies, by the way.)

http://www.sourcewatch.org/wiki.phtml?title=When_George_W._Bush_met_Ahmad_Chalabi

Chalabi is the BushCo dupe to push the Iraqi WMD info to prepare the US public for war.

The documents that claim Iraq is trying to buy Uranium in Niger are forged and leaked to the Italians, and are used in the State of the Union 2003.

All during the run-up, Judith Miller is printing Ahmad Chalabi's crap about WMD in Iraq. Judith Miller is the press dupe to get the word out to the public about WMD in Iraq for BushCo.

http://newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/news/media/features/9226/

Iraq is invaded March 20, 2003.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_invasion_of_Iraq

Joe Wilson embarasses the administration by saying they knew before the State of the Union that Iraq didn't attempt to obtain Uranium in Niger. His op/ed is printed July 6, 2003.

So, the plot to expose his wife, in which Judith Miller is again involved. Robert Novak prints his column outing Plame July 14, 2003.

December 2003 Plame leak investigation names Fitzgerald special prosecutor after Ashcroft recuses himself.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valerie_Plame

May, 2004, Reporters are subpoenaed to testify before the Grand Jury on the Plame leak.

On May 19, 2004, the US stops payment to Ahmad Chalabi and on May 20 raided his offices. (He is discredited at this point and Bush denies knowing him.)

In June 2004, Bush and Cheney are interviewed by the Special Prosecutor.

July 2005, Judith Miller goes to jail rather than reveal her sources and testify before the Grand Jury. It's reported by some news outlets that she's afraid of the power of the government, and that's why she won't testify.

What if they reason why she won't talk is because she knows too much about the BushCo Chalabi Iraqi WMD information fixing links? If Fitzgerald is probing information fixing in conjunction with the outing of Plame, questions could be asked of Miller if she were forced to testify. The WHY of the outing is important to prosecution of any crime, and thus it would be explored for background to make the crime understandable to the jury.

Here are some excellent articles:

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content?031027fa_fact
http://newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/news/media/features/9226/index2.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good presentation of the timeline!
Thanks for the great post!

:kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerRepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think what was surprising to me when I did this bit of research...
...is that Chalabi is British and lived for a long time in Britain. Recall that the Brits were heavy behind the Iraqis buying Uranium in Niger story. Chalabi was also in neck deep with the NeoCons and Judith Miller. Chalabi and the INC were also feeding Iraqi WMD info to Italy, which is where the forged documents were found indicating Iraq was attempting to purchase Uranium in Niger. I would suspect Chalabi and the INC of acting on their own except they were funded by the US and had ties with the CIA.

Here's some interesting info I found:

http://www.parapundit.com/archives/002126.html

I also found it quite strange that Chalabi was discredited around the time Fitzgerald started really digging into the reporters and BushCo over the Plame leak.

There's some odd information in all this, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerRepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Here's one more bit of data to add to the odd mix...
"An urgent investigation has been launched in Washington into whether Iran played a role in manipulating the US into the Iraq war by passing on bogus intelligence through Ahmad Chalabi's Iraqi National Congress, it emerged yesterday.

Some intelligence officials now believe that Iran used the hawks in the Pentagon and the White House to get rid of a hostile neighbour, and pave the way for a Shia-ruled Iraq.

According to a US intelligence official, the CIA has hard evidence that Mr Chalabi and his intelligence chief, Aras Karim Habib, passed US secrets to Tehran, and that Mr Habib has been a paid Iranian agent for several years, involved in passing intelligence in both directions."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1224075,00.html

The question is - did Iran use Chalabi (which I have doubts about since I don't think Iran would want the US in the middle of Iraq as well as in Afghanistan), or did BushCo use Chalabi to manipulate the US? Whatever went down, Chalabi was a key player.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC