Eminent Domain ruling by the Supremes

[SHRED]

I heard today that one of the Supremes is going to be profiteering off this new ruling.
Details please?
Links?

Thanks

[OldLeftieLawyer]

1. No

You heard that David Souter's property in his home state might be subject to eminent domain. It is in no way affected by the Kelo ruling.

Read the opinion - it'll clear your mind.

http://tinyurl.com/bttc3

[Igel]

2. Don't know about profiteering.

The only thing I heard was on a conservative site, taken at face value there; it's apparently tongue-in-cheek, or just a stupid stunt, by a former "objectivist"-leaning wanna-be politician in California.

http://www.freestarmedia.com/hotellostliberty2.html

The stupid stunt business refers to the conclusions at:
http://www.chicagoboyz.net/

(Who basically ran into the same set of webpages that I did, in googling the freestarmedia info for confirmation, or some indication that it's not just a goofy webpage.)

[Bluesplayer]

3. I don't know if it's a stunt

It sounds to me like a legitimate way to get Souter to support his own ruling by applying it to his own property.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/new_hampshire/articles/2005/06/29/proposal_replace_souters_home_with_lost_liberty_hotel/