|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
rfranklin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-26-05 09:03 PM Original message |
As progressives/dems we should all be "pro marriage!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-26-05 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
1. But Rush is so pro-marriage, he's done it THREE TIMES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rfranklin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-26-05 09:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. And if he married a man it might stick the fourth time... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-26-05 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
3. Not all peeps desire marriage, Pubs included. Why not Pro Better Living??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
I Have A Dream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-26-05 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
4. Very good point. This is something that the Right would do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rwenos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-26-05 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
5. ARE there any RW good family men? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-26-05 09:41 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. They speak admiringly of your marriage and your child |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-26-05 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
6. WHY? marriage is an outdated, patriarchal institution that epitomizes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rwenos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-26-05 09:21 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Well, We Kind of Did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-26-05 09:26 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. no, I didn't miss anything. you apparently did, though, since I pointed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rwenos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-26-05 09:33 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Isn't So. Baptist Convention Illegal in California? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rfranklin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-26-05 09:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. That is up to the individuals involved... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-26-05 09:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Actually, we came up with a new, egalitarian and respectful marriage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rfranklin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-26-05 09:42 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Hey, I want to be carried over the threshold! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-26-05 09:43 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. She can use a wheelbarrow. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
I Have A Dream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-27-05 04:43 PM Response to Reply #6 |
18. Even worse... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassicDem (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-26-05 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
15. I am against... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-26-05 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
16. I'm happily single and cheerfully childfree, so I won't promote marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boo Boo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-26-05 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
17. Right! Marriage for everybody!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:14 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC