Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hey dumbass Kay Bailey! Gun laws in Texas do NOT work in DC!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 06:46 AM
Original message
Hey dumbass Kay Bailey! Gun laws in Texas do NOT work in DC!!
This is fucking horrible because unlike other major urban areas, DC has no say in the laws that are passed for their city since DC is basically 'taxation without representation' and get their laws given to them by a congress that they have no representation in it.

Kay, if you want to be a pistol packing mama, then why not move your home out of DC and into Rick Santorum (R-PA) home state of Virginia. Big Cities want and need different gun laws than suburban/rural areas.

This bill, unfortunately, will probably pass making it 1000% more unsafe in a city that doesn't need anymore guns flooding its streets - especially concealled weapons

:cry:


http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/this_just_in/documents/04776528.asp

GUN CONTROL
Re-arming DC: Senators want to pack heat in capital
BY DAVID S. BERNSTEIN


As a US Senator from Texas, Kay Bailey Hutchison splits time between her home state, where she is allowed to own practically any weapon invented and can even carry a concealed handgun, and the District of Columbia, where she can’t even keep a .357 Magnum in her house. For 12 years she has managed to abide this without complaint, but apparently she’s had enough. In May, she filed a bill to overturn DC’s gun-control laws, and this week she indicated that she has more than 30 co-sponsors and intends to push it to the floor for a vote in the near future.

The bill would, in one swoop, negate all the gun laws the district has adopted over the past 30 years, including pre-purchase criminal-background checks and bans on semi-automatic weapons and cop-killer bullets. If it passes the Senate, it is expected to breeze through the House, which passed a similar bill last September.

In the press release announcing the bill, Hutchison is quoted saying, apparently without irony: "The rights guaranteed by the Constitution do not end at the borders of Washington, DC."

In fact, the bill is an example of the opposite: unlike everyone else in North America, DC residents can have their own local laws rewritten by a group — the US Congress — in which they cannot elect a voting member.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. So who in DC does Kay want to take out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think the same people my cats want to take out
I mean, every night those cats are chasing around somebody in my home because they're running real face and doing the attack pose and all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. There's plenty of illegal guns in DC
This bill wouldn't do anything to address criminals with guns and the high homicide rate with guns. Unless we want to turn DC into the equivalent of Hitler's fucking bunker, I think we should try a different approach, like fighting poverty and giving more opportunities to get ahead in this nation.

With the money blown in Iraq, we could've given every college student a Pell grant large enough to cover all tuition expenses for several years. No, we invest in blowing up lives and inflicting misery, not building and enriching human life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Unfortunately that has to go through congress too
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. So maybe she'll run for Governor of Texas after all.
Time to talk tuff! She was "the less insane Senator from Texas" when her colleague was the loathsome Phil Gramm. Cornyn has allowed her to continue in that role. Perhaps she has to convince the less evolved Texans that she's nutty enough to be Governor.

One of W's "strengths" when he ran against Ann Richards was promising the "right to carry." Most Texas law enforcement agencies opposed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC