Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's Problems Has GOP Worried

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 08:51 PM
Original message
Bush's Problems Has GOP Worried
Edited on Wed Jun-15-05 09:44 PM by ClarkUSA
As funny as this may sound, President Bush misses John Kerry. In the 2004
campaign, Bush sought to make the election a referendum on the Democratic
senator's character and leadership skills rather than his own record as
president. Now that he has nobody to run against, every day is a referendum on
Bush. And it's taking a toll.


Bush's approval ratings are among the lowest of his presidency. Voters are
growing increasingly uneasy over the war in Iraq and the economy. His signature
domestic issue, Social Security reform, was received coolly by Congress and the
public. Some Republicans are raising the prospect that Bush could cost them
control of Congress.

What happened in seven months? One explanation is that he lost his punching bag, a political rival who, once pummeled, helped make Bush look good by
comparison.

On Election Day, a majority of voters were concerned about the war in Iraq and
the economy. But the president and his bare-knuckles political team with some
help from Kerry convinced enough voters that the Democrat was an indecisive,
flip-flopper who might do more harm than good. Voters might not agree with his
policies, Bush said, but at least they knew where he stood.

Now, with nobody else to blame, Bush stands alone. He can't deflect voter
concerns about the economy and other pressing domestic matters. With the death toll in Iraq pushed above 1,700, more than double the number of a year ago, it's no longer a choice between Bush and Kerry.

It's Bush's war. Period.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-5076834,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. I agree. Also, I think Dean hit the nail on the head
Investigate Memogate



http://brainbuttons.com/home.asp?stashid=13
Buttons for brainy people - educate your local freepers today!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. I hope Dean never let's up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. And the silence
of the Dem's after Nov 2, 04. Gave * and the media, absolutely no cover for their own silliness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eaprez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. They must have missed his speech last night....
...where he blamed the Democrats for everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldeneye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. It's mentioned further into the article.
They say he's looking for a new punching bag...democrats in congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bush couldn't have done it without the media covering up for him 24/7.
They lied to the American people. NOONE knew where Bush stood on anything. NOONE.

The fundies didn't know that Bush was FOR civil unions for gays.

Fundies didn't know that Bush doesn't want abortion to be illegal. His mother, wife and daughters are all prochoice, and every Bush is....they only PLAY at being antiabortion for the activism of the prolife political movement.

Most Republicans BELIEVED Bush was being honest about his motives. The media didn't examine his mountains of lies.

The people had no idea that Bush purposefully refused to read HartRudman Report on Global Terror that was handed to him on Jan 30, 2001. The media never bothered with that major bit of criminal ncompetence and DANGEROUS STUPIDITY.

Imagine we had a media who told the truth instead of one that covered Bush's ass endlessly for 6 years.

When will the media point at themselves for allowing this arrogant, imperialist moron to go unexposed and unpunished?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. That just about sums it up in simple terms, recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oscar111 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. "punching-bag Kerry" not possi without media control: AAR now ending that
Edited on Wed Jun-15-05 09:50 PM by oscar111
control too.

Focusing on Kerry back then always was strange. No evenhanded campaign coverage would have allowed such odd tarring of Kerry's record.

Now, the arena is dfferent. AAR is here and growing.

Credit the sinking of poll numbers to more voters hearing our side.

get a free YahooGroups forum going for your town's AAR suporters. Meet them and lobby for an AAR station in your town.

ask aflcio and DNC to give grants to AAR to spread to new stations.
Both of these retarded groups should have set up an AAR in 1920. A movement with NO VOICE is a crippled movement. Both groups watched Hate Radio grow for 2O years and did not build an answer to it.

AAR is our only "push media". Pull media like DU and the blogs are fine, but will not reach the millions of voters who are too lazy and too uncommitted to tap us up on a keyboard.

AAR is the lifeblood of the dems today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. There is no AAR in my town of 350,000 people
When is it coming?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think there's a bug in the software - the OP looks lopsided
Elad, are you there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AAARRRGGGHHH Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. I was thinking of this today
Edited on Thu Jun-16-05 12:22 AM by AAARRRGGGHHH
This might be extremely crazy, and please tell me if I am making no sense but ...

Is it maybe a good thing that * stole the election? If Kerry would've been elected (assuming he hadn't already set a course to get us out of Iraq, which would be near impossible in 5 months), presumably things would be going just as bad over there. The economy would still be in the john, and while he would obviously be working overtime to repair our reputation around the world, we would still be seen as the World's A-holes. You would have to assume that the Repugs and their 37 channel propaganda machine would be working overtime to blame him for all of these things, right?

Also, if (God forbid) there was another terrorist attack (and I think it's tough to argue that it's an 'if' instead of a 'when'), clearly the Pukes would stop at nothing to pin 100% of the blame on his chest (next to the Silver Star he got for actually SERVING his country). So, in terms of the bigger picture, we'd get 4 years of Kerry followed by 8 more years of Jeb.

Is this crazy, naive and stupid? I think that the whole thing HAS to blow up in Bush's face for us to have any kind of chance at staying power.

p.s. Sorry if this is a hijack - I'll be glad to delete it if it is :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. I have heard this more than once before the election. Good point.
Hind sight does sometimes put things in focus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
10. Don't you love karma?
It's so great to watch. :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
11. What, he's not blaming Clinton? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dxstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
14. Ol' Leatherface needs some new brush to cut...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC