Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Denies French Fighters Emergency Landing Rights

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 11:01 AM
Original message
US Denies French Fighters Emergency Landing Rights

http://www.counterpunch.com/lindorff06072005.html

Talk about fair-weather friends!

When nine French fighter jets and a weather plane from a French carrier taking part in a joint exercise with Canadian Naval forces in the Atlantic off New Jersey ran perilously low on fuel last Friday because of a freak storm that prevented them from returning to their ship, they figured, no problem. They weren't too far from the U.S. mainland, and so they could just land at McGuire AF Base in southern New Jersey.

No dice, the Francophobe U.S. military told them. According to a State Department source, quoted in the Philadelphia Inquirer, they were denied landing rights at the facility.

Faced with the choice of ditching their planes or finding an alternative landing site, the French pilots, with the help of frantic State Department and Federal Aviation Administration officers, managed to arrange landing permission at the commercial airfield in Atlantic City, though this necessitated delaying and rerouting several commercial flights because of the number of planes that were coming in at once.

No national American media mentioned this stunning--and potentially life-threatening--breach of basic air etiquette by the U.S. military. And not for lack of knowing about it: many news organizations covered the whole thing as a humor item, focusing on the French pilots spending a night in the debauchery of America's East Coast Vegas.
-snip-
---------------------------


the article ends by saying:

One wonders what the American reaction would be if a French military airport turned away American pilots in similar circumstances-or what the French reaction would have been if the planes hadn't made it safely to Atlantic City.


this is outrageous

I apoligize to the French for the life threatening acts of the criminals in charge of america.

and our puke media should be thrown in prison along with the bushgang.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Another fine example of the MORAL VALUES shown by
our leaders.
They could care less about a human life other than their own and the unborn embryo they want to save.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. and the persistent vegetative state
with which so many of them closely identify.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spectral Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
32. ::Shaking head::
Oh my...

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is insane!
Edited on Thu Jun-09-05 11:06 AM by Ravenseye
I'm flabergasted.

I'm sure some freep would try and defend this somehow, but I just can't see it.

If american fighter planes low on fuel were denied landing rights at a french airfield...wow. I can't even begin to imagine the backlash here.

Do unto others folks. It's a matter of respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm sure it will not go un-noticed in Europe. Guess, go-it-alone Bush
and company really don't want any of our traditional allies except the poodle!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. France - I AM SO SORRY - we are trying to get rid of them
I SWEAR! Please don't hate us for our idiot leaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Actually, their opinion of us lowered a little after the 2004 elections
They're less likely to trust our collective judgment now than before. At least, this is what I was getting from news reports coming from Europe after Nov. 2nd. I mean, one headline in the British press said how could 59,000,000 people be "so stupid."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. France We are sorry WE ARE Getting rid of him as fast as we can
You have to understand we never elected him and we are fighting the Corporate Controlled Media at the same time. But WE SHALL OVERCOME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. Ask Rummy about this at his next press conf.
Any reporter got the balls? Didn't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. At last! Sweet revenge!
That'll teach those French fighter pilots for not bombing Saddam! Woot! Woot! Yay America! USA! USA!

Now excuse me while I enjoy some all-American freedom fries, having already breakfasted on freedom toast.

Hey, think we can change the name of France itself to, like, Freedomland or something?

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
8. French response to american inhospitality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Fetchez la vache.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Mooooooooooooooo......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spectral Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. LOL!!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 04:41 AM
Response to Reply #18
34. *splat*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bixente Donating Member (464 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. A disgusting act.
Despicable. So, these French pilots get punished because the U.S. Military disagree with decisions made by the French government?

This is so...juvenile. I thought the U.S. was a good, decent country?

And the fact this story is treated as a piece of humour...They could of lost their lives!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuaneBidoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Was this posted in the news section? If not it seems to qualify to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dyedinthewoolliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think it was Mark Twain
that said when asked about his newspaper reporting days, "people ask me if I make up my material, I don't have to. I'm a newspaper reporter" or words to that effect. In other words, this is so outrageous as to make me think it's a prank or April Fools day joke, But it's not!!!!!!!!
This is yet another low point, when I'd of thought we hit bottom long ago. What must the reast of the world be thinking of the Unted States now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. ah burnign even more bridges I see
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spectral Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. Rumsfeld believes that France is not an ally
He actually said this. But this is really awful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
14. good lord.
we're gonna wind up in a World War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spectral Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. I always wondered if the war in the middle east was really about the EU
and the euro. France kind of sees itself as the head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pooka Fey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. I have no more words to express my outrage.
We live under a barbaric government-military-corporate junta. Every single day, when I think the U.S. government has finally reached the low point of inhumanity and hatred; I wake up, read DU and find that I was mistaken.

:cry::cry::cry:

How can France still believe that the U.S. is an ally? With friends like the U.S.A., who needs enemies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
name not needed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
21. These asshats sure can hold a grudge.
"hey now, if it werent fer us murkans you cheez eatin surrendah monkeys wooda been eatin hitlars dick rite now!!!1"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
22. International aviation law, like maritime law, provides for safe-harbor.
A few years back, when the US military was in the process of stealing the island of Diego Garcia from its inhabitants, a yacht - a thirty-foot Australian-registered steel schooner with determined journalist Simon Winchester on board - sought anchorage in the lagoon at Diego Garcia. Journalists and native inhabitants were banned on Diego Garcia and the outer archipelagos by the British and American authorities. The US military tried hard to keep Winchester from getting close to Diego Garcia, including buzzing the yacht every day with a Lockheed C-130.

Winchester's skipper, a no-nonsense Australian woman, sailed (well, sneaked) into the lagoon at Diego Garcia and anchored among the warships and atomic submarines. When officials found them out, they were furious and attempted to expel the yacht and crew from Diego Garcia. The skipper, however, stood her ground and claimed the lagoon as a 'port of refuge', as was her mariner's rights. They ended up staying in the lagoon for two weeks; the authorities couldn't do a damn thing because international maritime law prevailed even in the US military controlled island of Diego Garcia. (See Winchester's excellent essay on this experience in Granta 73, Spring 2001).

International aviation law is pretty much the same. A declaration of emergency (which the French flight may or may not have declared) should open up the closest suitable airports for use by the aircraft experiencing the emergency. If a low-fuel state is not an emergency, it soon will be. It is absolutely unconscionable that these French military pilots were jacked around by US military authorities. I am ashamed that this jingoistic regime as stooped to fucking with aviators in distress.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spectral Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Wow. This was really interesting
Thanks for the post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #22
30. Shocks the hell out of me!
Edited on Fri Jun-10-05 12:27 AM by burrowowl
My Father was in FAA ATC for 36 years and with ICAO setting up ATC procedures in Mexico and Central America.
Mexico has always observed proper protocol with respect to the U$, it has not been reciprocal.
Also White Sands Proving Grounds sent some V2s to a Juarez cemetary after WWII, the Mexicans just sucked it up.
The U$ would stir up a shit storm if its pilots had been denied landing rights when in distress, they would have dropped their stores on the airport inert or not.
Don't get me started!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pooka Fey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
24. Kicking. This post is "Greatest Page" worthy. Nominated. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
26. I'm with DemoTex on this.
Edited on Thu Jun-09-05 07:02 PM by bvar22
Weather closing in...low on fuel.....Denied landing permission.
If there was ANY doubt about ALL elements safely reaching an alternate..

Declare an emergency and land anyway.
What are they gonna do??
Imprison the pilots?
Confiscate the aircraft?
Block the runway during a declared emergency?


Let the asshole politicians fight it out. I'll stay alive and keep my pilots alive and my planes intact.

This just STINKS!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
27. I aplogize on my country's behalf as well, we are not worthy
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
28. Utter assholes - this violates all the rules of coming to the aid of
fellow travellers. I hope this is not true, even the US military could not be this stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davepc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
29. Link to the article in the Philadelphia Inquirer about the incident
http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/local/states/new_jersey/11811596.htm

The warplanes - nine carrier-based attack aircraft and a radar plane - had to find dry land in a hurry late Thursday. A sudden storm south of the Delmarva peninsula kept them from returning to the carrier de Gaulle while taking part in joint exercises with the U.S. Navy.

"Initially, we thought one of the jets was having mechanical problems, but their forced landing here was strictly weather-related," said Holly Baker, spokeswoman for the Federal Aviation Administration. "There was also some concern about fuel."

The pilots first asked permission to land at the nearest military air base.

U.S. officials denied that, according to Noel Clay, a spokesman for the State Department. But they did give the French permission to land on American soil, and the planes were then diverted to Atlantic City International in Pomona, Clay said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spectral Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Thanks for the link
The eaters of "freedom fries" won't care. You know there is a stand in Philly international airport that sells "Freedom fries".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngGale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
33. I'm humiliated and apologize to the French for...
our leaders who act like spoiled rotten brats. :blush:
Pease remember, we didn't vote for any of them - I swear we didn't.
That's the DU truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashbridges Donating Member (349 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
35. *Sigh* That's not an article
That's a blog at best. The Philly article he references explains everything that happened, and it doesn't sound like we fucked the French.

Here are some choice quotes from the original story:

Initially, we thought one of the jets was having mechanical problems, but their forced landing here was strictly weather-related," said Holly Baker, spokeswoman for the Federal Aviation Administration. "There was also some concern about fuel."

The pilots first asked permission to land at the nearest military air base.

U.S. officials denied that, according to Noel Clay, a spokesman for the State Department. But they did give the French permission to land on American soil, and the planes were then diverted to Atlantic City International in Pomona, Clay said.


And:

"We had to scramble to get the necessary diplomatic clearances to allow them to land, but they were obtained," Clay said.

And, of course, a quote to directly contradict your "article" above:

"Winter said their arrival did not interfere with other traffic at the airport, more accustomed to high rollers on private planes and the budget carrier Spirit Airlines."



Considering it is difficult even for an American plane to get permission to land at a military base if there are other alternatives, it sounds like we took care of the pilots the best we could. Two of the pilots stayed with the planes to watch them while they were at the airport, and the other eight got a night at a hotel.

And the most important part of the story? No pilot died.

No apologies are necessary here. They were on a joint exercise with the US Navy. They couldn't get back to the carrier, they landed on dry ground.

If you are going to bother to post, could you at least do some fact checking first?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. they were doing joint exercises with CANADA


I will continue to bother to post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC