Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush administration developing governmentwide personnel reform bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 12:10 AM
Original message
Bush administration developing governmentwide personnel reform bill
Bush administration developing governmentwide personnel reform bill

By David McGlinchey
dmcglinchey@govexec.com

The Bush administration has drafted a civil service reform bill that proposes governmentwide implementation of a new system based on reforms that are being implemented at the Defense and Homeland Security departments.

The legislation is known as the 2005 Civil Service Modernization Act and a draft letter addressed to House and Senate leaders that accompanies the bill is signed by Dan G. Blair, acting director of the Office of Personnel Management. OPM officials said Tuesday that the bill is still being refined and has not yet been sent to Congress.

In the draft letter, which was obtained by Government Executive, Blair called the General Schedule pay framework a "failure" and proposed its complete removal by 2010.

According to a draft of the legislation, OPM proposes to implement a new civil service system with occupational pay groups, pay bands within those groups and pay for performance across the federal government. Agencies would be required to have a plan developed by 2008 for the implementation of an OPM-certified performance pay system. If agencies cannot meet that deadline, they would be required to adopt a standard OPM system.

Under the proposal, the General Schedule system that has governed the federal civil service since the late 1940s would be eliminated by 2010.

http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0605/060705d1.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Looks like another nail in the Labor Movement's coffin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastLiberal in PalmSprings Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. Patronage, here we come!
Competence is not an requirement for advancement, loyalty is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. My first thought, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spectral Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. It's worse than that. Please read my post below if you get a chance
Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. jebbie did this in florida
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spectral Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. I recommended this because it is extremely important to average Americans
Most of the work of the Federal Government is done by civil service employees. Over the past 30 years they have been losing protections and benefits. 1985 was a big year in which the retirement system changed, putting lot sof federal employees' money in the stock market. This is the same sort of ideology behind the Social Security "reform." Going back further, during the Carter era, heads of agencies (Bureau Chiefs and the like) became political appointees instead of careerists.

As the Federal employment system becomes gutted, and protections for workers taken away, the American people will be left at the mercy an overly politicized bureaucracy.

For example, consider your average cost analyst--GS 12, 13 or 14--at a federal or military (civilian employee) agency like NavSea or DISA. A secure employee without political pressure can do an honest analysis of a cost--like the cost of a jet--and bring it to his or her boss without the risk of being fired. This cost estimate is the basis of the bidding process that is supposed to occur. Even if the higher up political appointees give the contract to someone they play golf with, the cost analyst's job is still protected. And that cost analyst is there to save TAXPAYERS money.

But what happens in a highly politicized environment? An honest cost-analyst could be fired for the wrong figures. Talk about leaving behind the "reality based community"!

Think of how certain agencies have already been forced to change their true statistics into ones more acceptable to the people in power: GAO, EPA, and there is a thread now on DU about changing figures to hide the effects of global warming.

We have to fight this. We need to write to as money congress people as we can and say we are against this. We will no longer be able to trust ANYONE, even careerist government employees if this happens. The corporations will be able to do exactly what they want.


This, by the way, was the goal of the neocons: to gut the Federal Government and its watchdog function. To put the American people completely at the mercy of corporations.

That is what this change in the Federal employment system will do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC