I getting worried, if Bush feels his initiative slipping as has happened

[hangloose]

with the Nuclear Option and the difficulties with Bolton as well as the slipping poll numbers and SS he will find something to focus attention on his most successful ploy, that being a strong military leader. So its a toss up North Korea, Syria or Iran. Whatever, as the momentum shifts away from him and his initiatives he and his neocon Neanderthals will take some action to refocus the country back again on him, why won't it work twice. Don't assault me I not saying anyone who blogs here falls for this but there million out there who will.

[AlinPA]

1. Many millions. Many, many millions in 'murca fall for it.

What ever he says, put boots on the ground, Operation Something- its the flag and "Good 'ole W", love it or leave it, support God and "W"- if you don't love "W", you don't love Jesus and you don't support the troops.......

[marmar]

2. It's never beyond...

the realm of possibility with him. He is the "war president."

:scared:

[kaygore]

3. We have to be attacked first

So what I fear is what type of attack the Bushies have planned next for us. Given that they are supposedly all antsy about some of these countries having nuclear weapons, I bet the attack is nuclear!

[Kipling]

4. Nah.

If Bush did an attack now it would look like it was his fault. But if the Dems win in '06 and he can blame them... better hope it was all just tin-hatting or else.

[kaygore]

5. They'd claim that if Kerry had won

the size of the bomb would have been bigger.

Seriously, they can't just attack for no reason again. Their focus groups have to be telling them that because the only people left who would buy are are the Kool-Aid drinking religious zombies and die hard repugs. My other Republican friends say that Iraq was poor intelligence and that it won't happen again.

[Imagine My Surprise]

6. Does dumbass still not have the option to do Executive Order on SS?

[ArkDem]

7. Interesting use of 'I'.