Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Texas Size Lies and Ideologues

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-05 11:21 PM
Original message
Texas Size Lies and Ideologues
The lies seem to be so numerous and so large that the media cannot grasp the size and extent of the deception. No one would be so daring, they assume. Or are they willing accomplices?
==============================================================

(from our friends at Buzzflash.com)

http://www.buzzflash.com/contributors/05/05/con05192.html

<snip>
In their zeal for the ever-greater fib, they are taking the "Big Lie" concept to a whole other level. Not simply happy with telling the same lie so often that those listening eventually accept it as fact; they appear to have signed on to the vile theory that if you lie all the time, the lies will metastasize, multiply, and spread, like a cancer eating at the truth, engulfing and consuming all reason until the lies become a new reality out of sheer force of gravity. In Bushworld, lies are the new truth.

<snip>
Taking a country to war is one of the most solemn responsibilities we bestow on our President, on our Commander-in-Chief. It would be hard to imagine a greater act of deceit than that which takes a country to war on a lie. Sounds treasonous. No doubt criminal. Which of course makes it very difficult to understand why the President is still free to walk the halls of our White House and act the part of sanctimonious purveyor of democracy, freedom and moral clarity.

If you haven’t heard, and you may not have because the mainstream media outlets in our country have largely ignored the story, The London Times obtained a classified memo confirming that the U.S. and Great Britain had made a secret agreement in the summer of 2002 to attack Iraq. Also discussed was the need to create conditions to justify war and to “fix” the intelligence and the facts around the policy. Yes, the fix was in well before the President sought Congressional authority to go to war “as a last resort”.

The leaked document, now known as the ‘Downing Street Memo’, created little stir among major news organizations in the U.S. when its contents came to light in early May. In their defense, this was right around the time the “runaway bride” had captured our collective imagination. It would be foolish to think that we would preempt a story as newsworthy as that to report on a clandestine agreement between two allied Western powers to invade an oil-rich country in the Middle East.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC