Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Inartful - the new word

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
keopeli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 12:47 AM
Original message
Inartful - the new word
"I have explained all such comments - even those inartfully made and taken out of context - on numerous occasions, including with representatives of your network."

I keep running the spell check and it keeps telling me that "inartfully" is not a word in the English language.

So, I've taken the liberty of authoring the definition:

in·art·ful (ĭn-ärt'fəl) pronunciation
adj.

1. Not lawful; illegal.
2. Contrary to accepted morality or convention; illicit.
3. Of, relating to, or being a child or children born to unmarried parents.

I base this on the origin of the word, as it was invented to describe the following comment by Delay:

After the passing of Terry Schiavo in spite of the unprecedented intervention of Congress and the Administration into a local controversy over marriage rights, Delay released the following statement:

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=45102

"Mrs. Schiavo's death is a moral poverty and a legal tragedy. This loss happened because our legal system did not protect the people who need protection most, and that will change. The time will come for the men responsible for this to answer for their behavior, but not today. Today we grieve, we pray, and we hope to God this fate never befalls another. Our thoughts and prayers are with the Schindlers and with Terri Schiavo's friends in this time of deep sorrow."

And, of course, the law that was allegedly broken:

Federal criminal statute, 18 U.S.C. §115 (a)(1)(B).

“Whoever threatens to assault…. or murder, a United States judge… with intent to retaliate against such… judge…. on account of the performance of official duties, shall be punished

This possible violation was addressed by Senator Lautenberg:

http://rawstory.com/exclusives/byrne/lautenberg_letter_delay_schiavo_401.htm

Delay's belated apology referred to his "inartful" remarks.

At a news conference yesterday, DeLay said those comments were made in an "inartful way," adding, "I shouldn't have said it that way, and I apologize for saying it that way." DeLay also expressed regret for failing to "explain it or clarify my remarks." He tried to explain ... his remarks by noting he was "passionate, particularly the moment and the day that Terri Schiavo was starved to death."

Notice that Delay never denies he means to take retribution against the persons responsible.

http://www.americanprogressaction.org/site/pp.asp?c=klLWJcP7H&b=508533

Before apologizing, Delay spent two weeks saying things like:

DeLay's spokesman, Dan Allen, said that "bjective observers know that Majority Leader DeLay was once again expressing his disappointment in how the courts clearly ignored the intent of the legislation that was passed. To suggest otherwise is simply obscene."

and

...six days after his initial remarks, DeLay responded to Lautenberg and refused to back down, instead taking the opportunity to attack Lautenberg. DeLay said that any criticism of his remarks "reveals either ignorance or contempt for the framework of checks and balances that make our constitutional republic possible." DeLay added that "nothing in my statement was threatening, irresponsible, dangerous, inappropriate, intimidating, or reckless.… No sincere interpretation of my statement could lead a reader to any other conclusion."

Now, according to my Constitutional knowledge, the House of Representatives has no oversight over the judicial branch. That means that a comment such as "The time will come for the men responsible for this to answer for their behavior" can not refer to lawful proceedings that Mr. Delay may direct. Therefore, "Whoever threatens to assault…" is a plausible argument for an indictment. Denials are after the fact.

--

As for the unwed parents meaning, here's a sample sentence:

As the adopted daughter of Rachel, who's father abondonded her before birth, the inartful child Ann had no hope of salvation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting....
How this use of language is so completely weaved into messages.

Thanks for the heads-up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 04:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It is interesting how road kill would try and convince us they are
street smart with lingo..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC