Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How bad a screwing was the DLC compromise?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:36 PM
Original message
Poll question: How bad a screwing was the DLC compromise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. You left off "We screwed the Republicans pretty good."
C'mon, don't rig the poll. That's what Republicans do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. "Fristians" == "republicans"
Sorry. But you could always vote for "screw you and your stupid poll" :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. yeah, well
I was in the mood for a smart-ass post more than a vote. :-) Happens sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Don't know. Let's see what happens after these eight judges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. uh-oh what does it mean if "screw you ..." wins?
I knew I should have left that off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't understand spinning this as a DLC deal
Of course several of them are DLC. DLC is centrist. It was the centrists in both parties who wanted a deal the most.

To spin this as a DLC deal is not constructive.

The Fristians feel like the party just stabbed them in the back. Rejoice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Perhaps two of them were not DLC'ers
and I object to the description of the DLC as 'centrist'. The DLC is the right wing of the democratic party and represents corporatism free trade and neocon interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. oh and I worded the poll to be light-hearted
so lighten up already. If you object to the poll pick "screw you". If you think it was a fair compromise try "equally screwed".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. To be on the right side of the left but the left side of the right
make one centrist. Your analysis cuts off the entire right side of the spectrum. To be the right wing of the Dem Party still puts you to the left of the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. The DLC is not centrist.
They are rightwing. They may not be as far to the right as the extreme right of the republican party, but they are pretty far right. Actually right/left are insufficient here for this discussion. The DLC is in cahoots with one of the three major factions of the fascist cabal that is running this country. That would be the corporatist faction. The other factions are the american taliban and the neocon imperialists. The corporatists and the neocons overlap so separating them into two distinct groups is an exercise in futility. But I digress.

The DLC is part of the problem. Their leadership is typified by this latest compromised blunder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Two questions: Does Clinton typify the DLC?
Do you consider Clinton to be right wing?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #23
33. lets see
big on welfare reform 'ending welfare as we know it': check.
neocon supporter: check
big on frying criminals: check
big on the War on Some Drugs: check
healthcare reform rather than universal healthcare: check
free trade rather than fair trade: check
big on No Child's Behind Left train 'em to test bullshit: check

Now there are issue where the DLC is not rightwing, at least nominally:

environmental issues: centrist
women's rights: centrist
affirmative action: centrist

And other issues where they prefer to not take a stand:
gay rights

Yes Clinton and the DLC are the rightwing of the Democratic Party and are not, in general, moderates or centrists. As the radical republican party keeps moving the bar ever further towards overt fascism indeed the DLC can appear *relatively* moderate, but they aren't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. For the Dems,
it's pretending to win when you lost. The repubs still claim they will use the "nuclear" option if the Dems "abuse" the filibuster. Pure bullying to get your way, nothing less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. The ones spinning this as a win the most
are the freepers. We're not pretending anything. Frist just let down his base in a big way. Woo hoo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FubarFly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's too soon to tell.
But if history is any indicator, I'd advise investing in a quality lube.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. DLC? WTF?
I didn't see Al Frum up there at the lectern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Joementum EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. Talk About Your Push-Polls /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. Political analysts at week's end are going to tab this one as a win for us
Dems win. They stop Frist, which means they slow Dobson, and McCain draws first blood in the GOP race instead of THE CAT BUTCHER, who was Dobson's pawn.

We're in this position in the first place because we lost the Senate. Now let's work to get it back.

I heard reports that Elizabeth Dole went out to Nebraska to smear Ben Nelson. Does anyone have a confirmation on that? I don't like that woman in the first place, and as pathetic as Nelson can be sometimes, he's at least nominally a Democrat and we get his vote about 50% of the time. As Kos pointed out, "50 % of Nelson is better than a 100% of" whatever nutcase Republican they run against him.

If perfection is your inflexible standard, tonight's deal will frustrate you. If you consider that Dobson is soiling his drawers right now, and Frist is weakened, the climate looks better for Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I consider the appointment of three shitheads with more to follow
a bit of a victory. Now lete me see which side won here. Hmmmm......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. What appointment?
Not a done deal. They have NOT been voted on yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. oh ok right sorry
the vote hasn't happened yet and some of the three might DIE before then, what with all the threats against activist judges etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. Do you seriously expect Rep. senators not to vote for them?
and even a few Democrats.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I'm waiting to see
I'm just pointing out that it hasn't come to pass yet. Some are talking as if it has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pgh_dem Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. There isn't a single instance of compassion, fairness or
rationality on the part of the Republicans.

"It" came to pass the moment they agreed to that stupid deal. The only thing that can stop it is Reid and/or Frist telling them to shove it.

Unfortunately, the deal doesn't hurt Frist at all. It preserves the nutcases' ability to nuke the senate again later on, and places an impossibly vague burden of proof on Senate Dems to prove 'extraordinary' circumstances for future use of the filibuster. None of them on either side cared all that much about Owens, Brown et al. They wanted an easy Supreme Court approval for an asshole like Scalia, and they just got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. They were shitheads prior to tonight's deal and we didn't have the votes -
-- in the Senate to stop them, SAVE for the filibuster. Those were the limits going into this evening that Reid had to work with.

You and I didn't impose those limits, but Reid has to work with what he has, not with what I personally WANT for the Senate as a legislative body.

I also think it's a very good guess that Frist proceeded on this parliamentarian effort at the behest of James Dobson. Dobson IMMEIDATELY issued a press statement calling the 7 Republican "moderates" "betrayers."

Specifically, Dobson said this:

This Senate agreement represents a complete bailout and betrayal by a cabal of Republicans and a great victory for united Democrats. Only three of President Bush’s nominees will be given the courtesy of an up-or-down vote, and it's business as usual for all the rest. The rules that blocked conservative nominees remain in effect, and nothing of significance has changed. Justice Clarence Thomas, Justice Antonin Scalia, and Chief Justice William Rehnquist would never have served on the U. S. Supreme Court if this agreement had been in place during their confirmations. The unconstitutional filibuster survives in the arsenal of Senate liberals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Theocratic poseur leaders like to tell their flock they are oppressed
Dobson is not going to say anything like this was progress or a reasonable compromise. Creeps like him want to stoke an ember of persecution and loss within the psyche of each of their followers. shameful!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. It is shameful, and you're right about that strategy. If I hear the --
-- phrase "persecution of Christians" from the right one more time, I'm going to set up my own Christian-Lion fights in the back yard, starting next weekend.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davepc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #15
39. What was going to keep them from getting confirmed ANYWAYS?
If the republicans blew up the Senate they STILL were getting confirmed.

We did not EVER have the votes to stop them from getting confirmed.

Moderate Republicans sold out their leadership to keep the filibuster and throw their weight around (meaning have some actual SAY) during the next SCOTUS appointments.

The moderate Republicans were sick of getting steamrolled by Frist and Bush and backed into positions they didn't agree with.

The moderate wing of the GOP has drawn a line in the sand AGAINST the far right wing of their party.

People who want all or nothing usually wind up with the later.

Frist got outmaneuvered by people in his own party.

Get him some Viagra, he's impotent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. So explain to me what happens next time.
Edited on Tue May-24-05 06:33 AM by Zhade
You know, when the Dems exercise the "extraordinary circumstances" clause for the first time, and the Republicans threaten the nuclear option once more.

Will "centrists" again have to cut a deal to prevent the loss of the filibuster?

How many times can they cut deals before b*s* gets everything he wants?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 06:21 AM
Response to Reply #39
43. Sorry but I don't see it that way.
Either way the republicans get all of their nominations. This way they look like reasonable people working together with the 'opposition party'. The other way they looked like intolerant immature radical asshats who, when they couldn't win by the rules, changed the rules, and had to break the rules to change them.

So we lose on the nominations and we lose on the preception of what just happened. Quite a deal.

There is no moderate wing of the rethuglican party. We were just out-maneuvered once again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davepc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. The republicans are not some monolithic bloc
They are just as much a coalition of different interests as we are, and the non religious fundamentalists/4th and 5th amendment supporters just told the white house and frist to FUCK OFF.

We open a crack in the party, yet somehow they got the better of us. yeah. right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
22. At best, we got Frist to take a step back
and get Rove further on board.
At worst, we gave them time to kill a few moderate republicans metaphorically or literally.

Watch it happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
25. Sorry but Byrd signed on that.
Edited on Mon May-23-05 10:17 PM by Mass
and he is not DLC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. Here's the list:
Joe Lieberman--DLC

Ben Nelson---DLC

Mary Landrieu---DLC

Mark Pryor---DLC

Ken Salazar---no DLC listing, PHenry rating -(minus)100

Kent Conrad---No DLC listing, PHenry rating -(minus)97.5

Robert Byrd---No DLC listing, PHenry rating -(minus) 60

These are the MOST conservative PRO-CORPORATE anti LABOR Democratic Senators in Washington DC.
Did they serve YOU, or their Corporate Masters?


I love Robert Byrd and he is NOT DLC, but he commonly votes in favor of Corporate Interests, like the Bankruptcy Bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #32
41. I do not disagree with you
I am mad at the deal. I am just contesting the DLC lable the OP gave to the deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chicago Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
28. Extremists on both sides (note: that includes myself and you)
are screwed.

It would have best for extreme liberals if the nuke option was used for the 2006 elections. I don't see how this is bad for Frist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. so if it ain't bad for frist
then how did "Extremists on both sides " get screwed? I see how we got screwed. I fail to see how they got screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
30. The Working Americans and poor got the royal screwing...
...AGAIN!!

The RICH Corporate Owners got everything they wanted today...
...AGAIN!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
31. we were sold out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #31
36. We need to dump Reid.
I realize that Mormon's are nice people but they believe that blacks and the disabled were bad angels and that their punishment is being black or disabled. It's part of the religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuPeRcALiO Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. if we had public opinion on our side we could have done better
Edited on Tue May-24-05 12:50 AM by LuPeRcALiO

than this. It looks like they just postponed the showdown.

Not good, because it might not be on our side next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cynot Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. Who would replace Reid?
Edited on Tue May-24-05 02:30 AM by Cynot
??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foo_bar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. he'd be replaced by conventional wisdom on the internet
That's where all the brilliant electoral strategies come from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
44. The usual screwing by the usual suspects.
Same as it ever was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cynot Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
46. I'm not entirely sure what to think yet.
The Freepers are screaming about it. I heard that Limbaugh went ballistic about it, and Dobson says he has been betrayed. But then I read comments from my hero Senator Feingold who said that this was not a good compromise and I put that together with seeing the likes of Janice Brown being put on the federal bench and I'm just not sure what to think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
47. When you can't know how bad you've been screwed, shouldn't ask!
What is that phrase, "Don't ask, don't tell."

This is NOT a "compromise" except in double-speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC