Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dobson: Agreement is betrayal and "a great victory for united Democrats"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:17 PM
Original message
Dobson: Agreement is betrayal and "a great victory for united Democrats"
snip>
"This Senate agreement represents a complete bailout and betrayal by a cabal of Republicans and a great victory for united Democrats. Only three of President Bush’s nominees will be given the courtesy of an up-or-down vote, and it's business as usual for all the rest. The rules that blocked conservative nominees remain in effect, and nothing of significance has changed. Justice Clarence Thomas, Justice Antonin Scalia, and Chief Justice William Rehnquist would never have served on the U. S. Supreme Court if this agreement had been in place during their confirmations. The unconstitutional filibuster survives in the arsenal of Senate liberals.

"We are grateful to Majority Leader Frist for courageously fighting to defend the vital principle of basic fairness. That principle has now gone down to defeat. We share the disappointment, outrage and sense of abandonment felt by millions of conservative Americans who helped put Republicans in power last November. I am certain that these voters will remember both Democrats and Republicans who betrayed their trust."

press release via Americablog
http://americablog.blogspot.com/2005/05/dobson-has-been-betrayedthe-other-side.html

Uh, wasn't the Senate operating under these very rules when the judges he mentions *were* confirmed? Isn't that what happened with Fortes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd hate to be Dobson's dog when he gets home..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Especially if he brings Santorum!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. ROFLMAO!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Dobson admits that he's been abusive with his dog.
James Dobson: Dog Abuser
By Chris Dugan
April 2000
http://www.geocities.com/cddugan/DobsonsDog.html

In his best-selling book, "The Strong-Willed Child," child-rearing author James Dobson describes how he abused his family's pet dachshund, Siggie:


"Please don't misunderstand me. Siggie is a member of our family and we love him dearly. And despite his anarchistic nature, I have finally taught him to obey a few simple commands. However, we had some classic battles before he reluctantly yielded to my authority.

"The greatest confrontation occurred a few years ago when I had been in Miami for a three-day conference. I returned to observe that Siggie had become boss of the house while I was gone. But I didn't realize until later that evening just how strongly he felt about his new position as Captain.

"At eleven o'clock that night, I told Siggie to go get into his bed, which is a permanent enclosure in the family room. For six years I had given him that order at the end of each day, and for six years Siggie had obeyed.

"On this occasion, however, he refused to budge. You see, he was in the bathroom, seated comfortably on the furry lid of the toilet seat. That is his favorite spot in the house, because it allows him to bask in the warmth of a nearby electric heater..."


: One of the greatest "secrets" of nonpunitive parenting (or pet-keeping) is "don't sweat the small stuff." If the dog is comfortable sitting on the toilet seat by the heater, why not let him sit there (so long as no one has to use the toilet at that particular moment)? Of course, for the neurotically-rigid James Dobson, sweating each and every little trivial, easily-avoidable non-issue and turning it into a battle of wills is the pure essense of what child discipline is all about. He writes:


"When I told Sigmund to leave his warm seat and go to bed, he flattened his ears and slowly turned his head toward me. He deliberately braced himself by placing one paw on the edge of the furry lid, then hunched his shoulders, raised his lips to reveal the molars on both sides, and uttered his most threatening growl. That was Siggie's way of saying. "Get lost!"

"I had seen this defiant mood before, and knew there was only one way to deal with it. The ONLY way to make Siggie obey is to threaten him with destruction. Nothing else works. I turned and went to my closet and got a small belt to help me "reason" with Mr. Freud."


: What Dobson never explains to his readers is WHY it was so essential that the dog sleep where Dobson wanted him to sleep instead of where the dog wanted to sleep. Dobson is behaving like a toddler who throws a violent tantrum if his "bedtime ritual" isn't adhered to down to the slightest detail. Making Siggie go to sleep on command where and when Dobson wants him to has been part of this overgrown toddler's bedtime ritual for six years. Now, Siggie is interfering with a small detail of this bedtime ritual of Dobson's by wanting to sleep somewhere else which is warmer and more comfortable. So Dobson, true to his infantile level of emotional maturity, throws a violent tantrum:

...

Entire article here:
http://www.geocities.com/cddugan/DobsonsDog.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. He took a belt to a dachshund?
It must be awful to be him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Oooooh, that gave me the creeps. Thank God he doesn't have
small children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. HELL YEAH. I knew he would be pissed off. This makes me even
more happy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. United? Well, then he hasn't been to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hey Dobson....
The American people just told you to go fuck yourself!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Well, or he could go do that to Horsley's mule... his choice, really. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. I knew it!
I knew old Dobsey would be mad! Haha, serves you right, you old villan. hahahahaha

(I have a personal grudge against this man--can you tell? I listened to him long ago on the subject of raising children, and now view his advice as wrong.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. He is just as big of a liar as the rest of this administration If he said
we are the winner then you can believe we are the losers..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. Him and Uncle Karl laughed while they wrote this!
I don't believe for a moment that he believes this was a win for the Dems....

I agree...if he said that we won, we lost...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #25
33. uncle karl fiddled about, fiddled about, while dobson steno graphed
great words and talking points from our leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #25
40. Agreed!
...He would NEVER say 'united' Dems...even it were true. The comment smelled the minute I read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. Dobson's had a bad day. This, and Trent Lott calling him "unchristian".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. if Salazar
helped in broking the deal as some are reporting,shit is hitting the fan in the rockies..salazar just made some really choice statements about doobie and the crazied bunch that support him. i love it when the fundies implode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. I would love to be fly on the wall watching him throwing shit around...
Edited on Mon May-23-05 09:33 PM by Rainscents
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. OH MY GOD, I AGREE WITH DOBSON
Sorry sorry, washing my mouth out with soap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Califooyah Operative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. hehehe. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. Dobson should try sucking my dick.
They say it relieves stress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. What unmitigated GALL!
What makes him think that his bullying threats scare anybody anymore? He is an ugly little man and most of the country knows it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. That made me smile. Thanks
Dobson sad. Me glad.

He's trying to spin it away from Frist I see though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DawnneOBTS Donating Member (374 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. ROFL! HAHAHAHAHA N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
18. Oh, Dobson, up your ass with a piece of broken glass.
I'm gonna have fun watching the fundies and the Repukes tear each other up overe the next several months.

Stand back and pass the popcorn.

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Might be fun to lurk at the RNC boards for a while.
That other place is just beyond my abilities to cope...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
21. So Dobson & SpongeBill are gonna cry in their beers together...
A horrible republican dilemma: One can not live without the other - so which one is in charge of the feeding tube now?:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
23. He's probably doubly pissed because Salazar was in on it!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fatpuppy Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
26. What is he talking about?
There was also a Democratic majority in the Senate when Thomas, Scalia, and Rehnquist were confirmed.

What a moron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
28. Am I the only one here.............
who thinks Dobson is quietly smiling to himself this morning? Sure, in public he HAS to exhibit outrage. However, in private, he got everything he really wanted. Three extremist Judges with the promise of many, many more. They're going to have a Supreme Court loaded with rabid, activist Judges.........Dobson's playing us like a fiddle. And we're dancing to the tune like the bunch of idiots we are. We're actually buying this........ :eyes: Sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mugsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
29. If it is "Unconstitutional", sent it to the Supreme Court
According to Dobson, the filibuster is "unconstitutional". If that is indeed the case, he needs to file charges and take it to the Supreme Court.

When Democrats return to power (and short of any further electronic vote tampering, should be soon), I certainly pray a Democrat re-introduces the "nuclear option" just to see how many Republicans suddenly "see the light" and oppose it. Even if you don't support your own bill, force the Republicans to vote against it (or *for* it even). Too sweet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dec1549 Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #29
44. Don't go to the SC
Randi Rhodes brought this up this afternoon. The filibuster is an "internal" Senate rule. It is not a law to be adjudicated. The Supreme Court has absolutely no authority over it. To bring the Supreme Court into an internal legislative matter would open up a can of worms we don't even want to go to. Even this Supreme Court would recognize that and not get into it. The filibuster isn't unconstitutional. It is a rule the Senate made over 200 years ago. The only thing that has changed is the number of Senators required for cloture. It used to be 67, it's now 60. That's why the Senate has been boondoggled over this for months. That's why Frist brought up the nuclear option. Even he realized this isn't a matter for any institution other than the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
30. Who the hell does Dobson think he is anyway?? *HE* doesn't run the Senate!
Fucking little POS fake Christian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Callboy Donating Member (167 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
31. how does this represent my interests
you just opened the floodgates of compromised principals.....

and the moderates try to rise above the fray saying the walked the higher ground of getting along with themselves,a victory for the people,

how is that a victory for the people when laws will be passed against their interests?

how pathetic....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amb123 Donating Member (764 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
32. What an idiot!
What an idiot! He's getting what he wanted! He'll have three judges that will vote against Church/State Separation, every time. They'll vote against a women's right to choose, every time. They'll vote against civil rights for Gays and Lesbians, every time. They'll vote to destroy our civil liberties, every time. They'll vote for Big-Brother Government, Big-Brother Corporations and Big-Brother Religion, every time. What is Dobson's problem?!

:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocracyInaction Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
34. Why do I smell political ambitions with some of this preachermen
right wing vermin?? They are all pitching a fit today. Perhaps they would like to lead a good Christian third party???------come on, come on, do it....make my day.......please.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
35. wah wah wah! wah!
wah wah!

republican piteous whining. Music to my ears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
36. If Dobson is upset with the recent compromise....
...The I'm thrilled with it.

I don't know that it's a democratic victory, but if it's seen as a loss by the wing-nuts, then I feel better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cestpaspossible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
37. Dobson: poster boy for hypocrisy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turn CO Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
38. Dobson will be on Fox News tonight, Hannity and Colmes
I can't stand to watch, but maybe somebody can bear up and provide us with the highlights of any Repub bashing by the good doctor...

<http://www.family.org/webextras/A0036642.cfm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anakin Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
39. Nothing Is Ever Good Enough
for rightwing fundamentalist nuts like Doo Doo Head Dobson!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmileMaker Donating Member (346 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
41. Dobson's Spanking Mad Jesus Posse
just made this up to describe his followers :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sickem Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Something is wrong here
Why would these wing nut Republicrites agree to compromise on anything right now? Someone must have thrown them a HUGE bone. I wonder what it was? Maybe a promise not to pursue impeachment of Bush over his Iraq WMD lies no matter how much evidence they get? Maybe a promise not to charge John McCain and the other phonies on the original commission that investigated Iraqi weapons claims with a Congressional cover up?

Something smells fishy here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dec1549 Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
43. Frist tries to back down
There is nothing "unconstitutional" about the filibuster. In fact, it is the one thing that makes this country a Democracy. It allows the minority to have a voice, it calms down "troubled waters," and it lets Senators stand back and take a deep breath. The Senate was envisioned by the Founding Fathers as a brake on the more rancorous and rambunctious House. The Senate was meant to serve as the "cooling off" branch of government. And it is also is the "upper" house in the National Legislature. The upper house of the third and equal branch of the government. There are reasons the founding fathers gave the two houses of Congress different responsibilities. The House is to have control of the purse strings because the House is supposed to be "closer to the people." That is also why the House is the only branch of government that can declare war Those are two very immediate events. The Senate, however, is supposed to be more deliberative. That's why it ratifies treaties, and advises and consents to judicial appointments. It isn't the president's right to have every judicial nominee he puts forth to be approved. In fact, the Founding Fathers envisioned the executive branch to be the weakest branch of the government simply because that branch consists of one man and they had all lived under the tyranny of a king. The tragedy of this country discounting history has just been proved. For people who know how the Founding Fathers really meant for this country to be governed, the compromise was a relief. However, I think it was a very flawed compromise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chomskysright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
45. no problem: they are backing into their corner nicely...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
46. They do not even have the common decency to say thank you
to acknowledge a gift. What ungrateful bastards they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC