I Have decided who our next nominee for President will be.

[Nimble_Idea]

OK, so Kerry didn't quite make the cut last time. He picked the wrong VP and kept saying the word subsidy and it cost us. This time we will make sure that the head of the show picks the right VP and can communicate with the sheep.
(Make no mistake, Kerry was our best shot last time)


Now our goal is to throw off the Pugs because we all know they like to destroy the candidate. So let us throw out all the false options and pump them up so rove can destroy our decoys.

The decoys are as follows: Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, John Kerry, Wes Clark, Mark Warner, Evan Bayh, Joe....NO ,NOT HOLY JOE!, Joe Biden.

So we know they are gonna throw Hagel or McCain at us in 08. If Rudy Tudy can make it through the fundie primary it's gonna be shyt city for alot of folks. But how much more can they possibly milk the seven eleven issue?

Well there ya go folks, Get to work. Make sure you get plenty of mud for them but only use it after their primary. Little jabs before hand and getting the public to think their pug candidate is a girlie man will be just what Arnald would do.

Good Luck!

[Bucky]

1. you forgot to name the nominee

bait and switch is bad form, Nimble_Tease

[mikehiggins]

2. Of course he did name the nominee...Wes Clark. eom

[Nimble_Idea]

4. I never said I was going to name the nominee

I said I have decided who it was going to be. The name will not be given out because then Rove can start his attack. Heck the nominee just might be in that group. Maybe putting out decoys and having Rove look elsewhere is the decoy.

Real dems know who the nominee is going to be. We told everyone it would be Kerry long ago, and now we know who it is with even more time ahead.

Last time I spent too much time trying to convince others here of it, This time it will all be about taking their pug candidate to task.

[rhett o rick]

5. Not naming the nominee was the point. Don't let Rove know until the last

minute. Maybe at the convention. I agree with throwing Decoys at them lik Hillary. Let Rove destroy the decoys. Don't name the canidate until last minute.

[G2099]

3. Suppose the next nominee was more like Galloway?

Would that make the candidate better or worse?

Would that give the candidate a better chance of winning or a worst chance of winning?

Should the next candidate be totally opposite to the puke candidate?

[rhett o rick]

6. The candidate should be honest. Was Kerry for the War or not?

i would rather lose with a strongly convicted candidate than lose with a wishee washee candidate like Kerry. Kerry said he was for everything Bush was but could do it better. yuck. no wonder he lost.
No conviction. Always on the defense. Give me a strong candidate.

[gizmo1979]

7. How about super atty general Spritzer.

The whole corp structure would be pissing their pants.He doesn't come with the Senate baggage I think he's viable.

[Imagine My Surprise]

8. I do not believe that Kerry WAS the best candidate...

I think he was perhaps the worst. He voted FOR everything Bush asked for. So the distinction would be?

[Nimble_Idea]

11. apparently you weren't awake during the election

I voted for the 87 Billion before I voted against it.

So EVERYTHING must be defined differently in your world.

Use your passion and convert it to energy on how to think as opposed to frothing at the mouth.

[watercolors]

9. Sorry, I hope its Hillary

We will get to have Bill back and I feel many would welcome that chance!!

[Nimble_Idea]

12. It won't be

Even Hillary can understand this one. I don't think she will do anything that would bring down the party and that includes her running.

[patricia92243]

14. Me too! The fact that the Republicans are scared to death of her is good

enough for me.

[McCamy Taylor]

10. They are gonna throw Cheney at us.

[Nimble_Idea]

13. Great, then we will give then Kucinich

or Dean, that would be priceless.

[patricia92243]

15. My sister, the Republican, did not know that Cheney had 5 heart attacks.

She would never vote for him for that reason, and that goes for a LOT of people. He is, afterall, eight years older than he was - plus the tricky ticker.

[saltpoint]

16. THE CAT BUTCHER's political future will depend some or a lot on --

-- how things go on Tuesday of this coming week.

Hagel, McCain, THE CAT BUTCHER, Allen, Brownback, and a few others have some shot at the GOP nomination. Pataki wants it, too, but he's been tied to the clothesline in the backyard and won't be let in to the house from this point on.

Rudy is damaged goods. The Religious Right is not going to vote for a guy who lived with two gay men after his divorce and who favors reproductive choice for women. He's toxic to the nutcases.

I'd vote for a Bob Herbert-Robert Redford ticket, or George Mitchell-Tom Harkin. Julian Bond-E.J. Dionne. First choice: Bill Moyers-Alexis Herman.

As clueless as the electorate often is, I don't think they like Social Security gutted, or sky-high gas prices, or dead women used as props for the hyper-conservative Republican majority.

I think 2006 will give us an encouraging uptick in our Congressional numbers and I think we clean their clocks in 2008 for the White House.

[election_2004]

17. I know who it's going to be too....

But I'm not saying, either. ;-)